<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>If You've Been Having Risky Sex, You'd Better Tell Your Partner (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486</link>
<description>Steven Stills once commented, "if you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with." &#160;But, according to the California Supreme Court, if you've had risky sex with someone, &lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-aids5jul05,0,4206892.story?coll=la-home-headlines">you'd better inform the one you're with&lt;/a>.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:13:06 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:04:17 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Iunebrave: Re: If You've Been Having Risky Sex, You'd Better</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#38</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://proscarpc.drug526.us">proscar comprar&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://adhd-adderallaa.drug03.us">adhd adderall&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://seroquelsi.drug476.us">seroquel indication&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://busparba.drug5.us">buspar appetite&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://ser</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:04:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Nekiihrac: Re: If You've Been Having Risky Sex, You'd Better</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#37</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://schweizerischesh.pampapleasures.com.ar">schweizerische handelszeitung&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://mietenmhs.nova-audiovisual.com.ar">mieten halle saale&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://schengensva.mphunter.com.ar">schengen visa application&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://h</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Feb 2007 03:51:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Nekiihrac: Re: If You've Been Having Risky Sex, You'd Better</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#36</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://cimiterocvr.avald.com.ar">cimitero verano roma&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://gba-romgrp.ingat.com.ar">gba rom pokemon&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://orologioof.aviv.com.es">orologio fossil&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://bonecasbpa.mc-eg.com.ar">bonecas porto alegre&lt;/a> &lt;a</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:10:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>sersaleelepe: Re: If You've Been Having Risky Sex, You'd Better</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#35</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://thyroid-disease-precorsor.pills69.us">thyroid disease precorsor&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://what-are-the-side-effects-of-naproxen.medicine7.us">what are the side effects of naproxen&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://flonase-nasal-spray-http-www-vrd.drug15.us">fl</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Dec 2006 05:20:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Trick Answer</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#34</link>
<description>My uncle, but I'm not about to throw that info on the Net just to win an argument with you.&lt;br>&#10;&#160; &#160;The story: he was diagnosed with colon cancer at an early age (38, IIRC), and in the process the blood tests revealed he was HIV positive. This was</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:43:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: I tip my hat to the (pending) revolution</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#33</link>
<description>Given that heterosexual African-American women are the highest new rate of infection of any group, I'm not seeing your argument. &#160;Or are you saying that it's only hetero women who are it risk, rather than hetero men makes it a non-issue?&lt;p>&#10;Thalia</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 00:02:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Who Wins?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#32</link>
<description>After spending a day or more musing about this, it occurred to me that a whole lot of people benefit from spreading the notion that heterosexual transmission of AIDS presents a significant risk. Sadly for Urkel, none of these require a minority conspiracy </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:59:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: Telling your partner your sexual history</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#31</link>
<description>First of all, the ruling didn't say anything about you having to out your entire sexual history -- only that history going back no further than six months that's pertinent to the question of whether you should have known that you might have HIV or an STD. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:32:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>koos: A reply to the entire argument</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#30</link>
<description>zyx::&lt;p>&#10;My understanding of your argument is as follows (and please let me know if I am wrong): (i) the government has overestimated the risk of harm certain populations have when it comes to HIV/AIDS infection, (ii) in order to prevent the citizenry from</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:06:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Milo: Re: Telling your partner your sexual history</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#29</link>
<description>&lt;i>What if you don't remember your sexual history?  What if you were raped or something you are quite ashamed of?  What if your previous sexual history is something your spouse would not approve of?  What if your fiancee, you thought she was a virgin, but </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:22:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Telling your partner your sexual history</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#28</link>
<description>This is controversial. &#160;What if you don't remember your sexual history? &#160;What if you were raped or something you are quite ashamed of? &#160;What if your previous sexual history is something your spouse would not approve of? &#160;What if your fi</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:40:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Not sure about that Steve</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#27</link>
<description>Steve, I knew a woman who contracted AIDS back in teh 1980's from a blood transfusion when she was giving birth to her daughter. &#160;The birth went bad, she lost a lot of blood and at the time, blood was not screened for HIV/AIDS. &#160;She died in 1990,</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:29:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Open letter</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#26</link>
<description>Blacks are homosexualists at higher rates than whites, but even taking that into account it is obvious that AIDS in Africa is different than AIDS here. Why not try and figure this out, instead of continuing to propagate the nonsense that "We are all equall</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:58:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Open letter</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#25</link>
<description>Fela Kuti spent 20 months in prison. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:50:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Fair enough</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#24</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>So it makes sense to suggest...they should take precautions.&lt;p>&#10;I don't understand any objection to such counsel&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I never said I objected to that. I objected to the idea that we should "overstate the risk of infection" in orde</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:38:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: Fair enough</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#23</link>
<description>Advising sensible prevention does not equal prevarication. You yourself said that having sex with extremely promiscuous people is risky. When one has sex with "random" people, that risk factor comes into play. So it makes sense to suggest to people that wh</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:19:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Fair enough</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#22</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...why not allow for koos's suggestion regarding sensible prevention?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I already explained why: honesty is the best policy. Encouraging government officials to lie in an attempt to further a social cause is especially bad. &amp;nb</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:06:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: Fair enough</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#21</link>
<description>&lt;i>I think it is better to tell people the full truth: that unless you have promiscuous gay sex, &lt;b>or have unprotected sex with extremely promiscuous people&lt;/b>, or (for a woman) have sex with a bisexual man, or use illicit IV drugs, you are almost certai</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:51:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Fair enough</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#20</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...I'd rather we overstate the risk...Since no one dies my way, and the costs are reasonable to me, I think it trumps yours&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Your way is similar to the strategy used by the government in the war on drugs and, by some, in attac</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:34:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>koos: Fair enough</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#19</link>
<description>Maybe I'm too paternalistic, or too into prevention instead of cure. I was raised to understand that it's "better to be safe than sorry". That's why I'd rather we overstate the risk of infection of a deadly disease than understate it. The worse thing I see</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:41:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>koos: Re: Open letter</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#18</link>
<description>Please see: Africa, AIDS Epidemic.&lt;p>&#10;Unless you also think all those foreign black men are gay? or reckless drug users?&lt;p>&#10;{ k }</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:37:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Maybe it's more what he says than how he says</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#17</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Why would you ever argue against educating people about potential harms?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I am arguing for the exact opposite. &#160;If someone says that the general population is at risk for contracting HIV because it's "no longer a gay dise</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:14:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>cutta: Re: Open letter</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#16</link>
<description>Fela Kuti.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:11:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>koos: Maybe it's more what he says than how he says it</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#15</link>
<description>zyx,&lt;p>&#10;QUOTE FROM CLUELESS: &lt;i>"That's only because of homo-sexualist propaganda claiming everyone is at equal risk for AIDS."&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Isn't &lt;i>risk&lt;/i> of AIDS based entirely upon safe-sex-having and non-needle-sharing... it's about FLUID TRANSMISSION, ri</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:02:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>socky: Re: Hmmmm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#14</link>
<description>This is well off the topic I think you are trying to steer the thread onto, but assuming that the strongest version of your suspicion were true, what would a sensible response be from any individual?&lt;p>&#10;Let's see, no man can catch a deadly disease from hav</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:40:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Toby Flip: Everyone's an Expert</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#13</link>
<description>There is (and will be forever, no doubt, as we are always going to be awkward when talking about sex) a lot of confusion, apocrypha and misinformation about HIV transmission and spread. &#160;This synthesis &lt;a href="http://www.sfaf.org/treatment/beta/b41/b</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:27:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Umn, Yeah</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#12</link>
<description>Except that heterosexual sex usually involves getting the consent of a woman. I don't know for sure- I wasn't there- but the whole "sexual revolution" involved women suddenly dropping their sexual inhibitions, more than the men, at least if the statistics </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:20:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: I tip my hat to the (pending) revolution</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#11</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...even the link I offered that you said proves Steve's point doesn't say that heterosexual spread of AIDS is almost an impossibility&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>No, it says the same thing I wrote above: transmission of HIV from a woman to a man, in the</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:09:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Hmmmm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#10</link>
<description>It's possible that, unlike all the other highly promiscuous men in the NBA (including non of Magics teamates, who theoretically would be banging at least some of the same chicks he did), NFL, MLB, NHL, unlike all the promiscuous actors and rock musicians, </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:03:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: I tip my hat to the (pending) revolution</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#9</link>
<description>And Steve's trolling goes a bit beyond just alleging that HIV transmission among heterosexuals is unusual; unless I'm missing a huge point, he's saying that that method of transmission is near impossible or so unlikely we should really have no concern abou</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:22:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>David Flores: Re: Open letter</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#8</link>
<description>Magic Johnson</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:02:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: I tip my hat to the (pending) revolution</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#7</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Nothing I like to read better than a fact-based analysis of AIDS written over a decade ago by an author who seems to have some "ethical questions" about his honesty and balance&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>For all Urkel's trolling, MayorBob, he's not wro</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:51:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: I tip my hat to the (pending) revolution</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#6</link>
<description>"a fact-based analysis of AIDS written over a decade ago"&lt;p>&#10;Yes, we've had ten years to see if heterosexual AIDS was a myth or if we really were going to swamped by an epidemic of heterosexual AIDS cases. So what happened? You tell me.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:13:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: I tip my hat to the (pending) revolution</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#5</link>
<description>Nothing I like to read better than a fact-based analysis of AIDS written over a decade ago by an author who seems to &lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jan2006/nf20060113_2851_db035.htm">have some "ethical questions"&lt;/a> about his honesty</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:49:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Open letter</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#4</link>
<description>To whomever moderated the above obnoxious, feel free to provide the name of a man who got AIDS from having sex with a woman. &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:29:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: I tip my hat to the (pending) revolution</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#3</link>
<description>"but "the H.I.V." likely remains a scary monster to many people who would otherwise be sexually active"&lt;p>&#10;That's only because of &lt;br>&#10;&lt;a href="http://www.fumento.com/mythexc.html">homosexualist propaganda&lt;/a> claiming everyone is at equal risk for AIDS. T</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:19:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: I tip my hat to the (pending) revolution</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#2</link>
<description>I remember hearing that the availability of "free love" and whatnot seemed to correlate with the availability of The Pill and the associated changes in the attitudes of society.&lt;p>&#10;Since the advent of HIV/AIDS in the '80s it appears that things may have sh</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:34:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>David Flores: Embarrasing...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2006/7/14/135155/486#1</link>
<description>If I've got to reveal my sexual history to every potential partner in the future, things could really get embarrasing. I wonder if I could be sued for "embellishing" things the &lt;i>&lt;b>other way&lt;/b>&lt;/i>, that is, to make my sexual history seem more... er... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:57:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>