<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Obama Ready To Run - But Is The US Ready For Him? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073</link>
<description>U.S. Senator &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama">Barack Obama&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070117/ap_on_el_pr/obama2008_19">launched &lt;/a>his presidential campaign with a &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/17/us/politics/17obama.html">Tuesday announcement&lt;/a> that he would create an exploratory committee before starting serious activities next month.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:37:37 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:34:13 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#32</link>
<description>&lt;i>&lt;br>&#10;Are you also against minimum wage and OSHA? &#160;I'm just curious. &#160;I'm also an immigrant, but free flow of labor has serious problems, even if you assume that we provide no services beyond education, roads &amp; national defense. &#160;&lt;/i>&lt;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:34:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>3fingerspointback: Too Soon</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#31</link>
<description>My call: &#160;This is going to be Obama's first of multiple runs for the presidency, and it's going to fail because he's too inexperienced. &#160;Yeah, he gives good speeches, but what exactly has he done? &#160;Written a couple of books about being Barac</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 03:51:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#30</link>
<description>Are you also against minimum wage and OSHA? &#160;I'm just curious. &#160;I'm also an immigrant, but free flow of labor has serious problems, even if you assume that we provide no services beyond education, roads &amp; national defense. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;Thalia</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:57:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>coquito: Re: Kucinich or bust!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#29</link>
<description>&lt;i>What do you think of this, by the way?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I think it smacks of the same hysterical mud-slinging (for lack of a better term) as the QL I posted on Obama being a smoker. I mean, really, people worry about this stuff? &lt;p>&#10;I'm actually not sure though w</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:31:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Kucinich or bust!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#28</link>
<description>I have a hard beliving Clinton's operatives are leaking to Insight, but you never know. But they will have to stick the knife in all her opponents, and democrats overlook how unscrupulous the Clintionoids are when it comes to the researching/smearing of op</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:23:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Must be good stuff</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#27</link>
<description>&lt;i>I've got some good Kucinich smack&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;It must be good...I'm getting a contact high.&lt;p>&#10;Yeah man! &#160;Kucinich 2008: &lt;i>It could happen!&lt;/i></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:43:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Acefantastik: Kucinich or bust!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#26</link>
<description>I've got some good Kucinich smack, but I've got to address that move likely pushed ahead by the buzz surrounding Barry Obama-- Senator Hillary Rodhan Clinton's  &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2007/01/20/VI2007012000455.html">re</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:40:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#25</link>
<description>You know, my mistake. When I asked you whether you've been snoozing, it was really in reference to your "Isn't the Democratic Party platform essentially pro-progressive taxation, pro-welfare, and pro-social security?" rather than whether wetkarma would vot</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:19:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>coquito: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#24</link>
<description>Thanks again. Gonna take me some time re-read all those threads... Oy!</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:47:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#23</link>
<description>&lt;i>&lt;br>&#10;I'd like to hear more about your objections to welfare and social security&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Much of my &lt;a href="http://www.plastic.com/article.html;sid=02/05/24/01492482">thoughts&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://www.plastic.com/article.html?sid=03/10/17/19274201">on&lt;/a></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:29:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>coquito: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#22</link>
<description>Thanks for the in-depth reply, wetkarma. All very interesting. If and when you have time, and you can always just send me a message if you don't want to post, I'd like to hear more about your objections to welfare and social security, and how you think the</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:02:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#21</link>
<description>&lt;i>&lt;p>&#10;But seriously, does this mean you essentially wouldn't vote for any Democrat? &#160;Isn't the Democratic Party platform essentially pro-progressive taxation, pro-welfare, and pro-social security? (not to mention and pro-or at least note rabidly anti</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:29:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>permazorch: Re: Obama Ready To Run - But Is The US Ready For H</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#20</link>
<description>I don't know...&lt;br>&#10;So far as I know him (not much at all, yeah), I like him, &amp; I'd vote for him with &lt;b>far&lt;/b> more enthusiasm than the last 3 dem candidates for prez (Clinton, Gore and Kerry).&lt;br>&#10;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:12:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>coquito: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#19</link>
<description>I've been accused of worse :D&lt;br>&#10;Someone called me "obtuse" once. But I showed him. No one likes "the box."&lt;p>&#10;Anyway... my point was that, if you are essentially unable/unwilling to vote for any Democratic candidate, why not just say so? Why say I don't </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:11:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#18</link>
<description>&lt;i>But seriously, does this mean you essentially wouldn't vote for any Democrat? Isn't the Democratic Party platform essentially pro-progressive taxation, pro-welfare, and pro-social security?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Coquito, have you been snoozing all this time? :-)</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:03:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>coquito: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#17</link>
<description>OK. At least you didn't call him a "gun grabber." &#160;:D&lt;br>&#10;But seriously, does this mean you essentially wouldn't vote for any Democrat? Isn't the Democratic Party platform essentially pro-progressive taxation, pro-welfare, and pro-social security? (no</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:50:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#16</link>
<description>&lt;i>&lt;br>&#10;Could you elaborate on that?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Certainly:&lt;p>&#10;Where I'm opposed to welfare, Sen. Obama wishes to extend welfare benefits to immigrants.&lt;p>&#10;Where I want to see social security dismantled, he wants to extend benefits to immigrants AND &#160;give </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:28:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>BigDumbSpaceApe: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#15</link>
<description>Hey, thanks coquito... very helpful.&lt;br>&#10;&lt;p>&#10;It looks pretty good to me, though I like to see the Environmental and Foreign Policy area flushed out. &#160; The lack of any foreign policy experience might really hurt him in a general election, but he looks </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:12:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Sam Jackson</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#14</link>
<description>Of course, he'd be a great orator...&lt;p>&#10;(cheap joke)&lt;p>&#10;"I'm tired of all these muthafucking conservatives in the muthafucking House!"&lt;p>&#10;(/cheap joke)</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:11:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: A cheap way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#13</link>
<description>If we had betting on politics and I was the sort who bet on politcs (I'm not, and I never would, because it's boring) &#160;I'd take long odds on Vilsack (or Ballsack, as I call him (see, I do it to everyone?)) upsetting the field. &lt;p>&#10;&#160;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:49:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: Ready or not...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#12</link>
<description>Hmmm. &#160;Let's see. &#160;John F. Kennedy, scion of a powerful Boston political family. &#160;A decorated war hero. &#160;Served three terms as US Representative in the House and a full term and reelected to a second in the US Senate. &#160;Wrote a Puli</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:40:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Acefantastik: Re: Ready or not...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#11</link>
<description>&lt;i>he has as much on his resume as JFK did.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Really? &#160;What war did Senator Obama fight in? &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:36:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Ready or not...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#10</link>
<description>The US was ready for Obama's level of experience at least once in the not-to-distant past; he has as much on his resume as JFK did. (Or, to choose a more recent but less successful run, John Edwards.)</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:28:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>coquito: Re: A cheap way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#9</link>
<description>You're absolutely right, you've called me out. (Despite the fact that I'm not white, I'm an educated, middle class, liberal American and 99% of my friends are white, so I'm close enough). &lt;p>&#10;But seriously, I &lt;i>may&lt;/i> vote for Obama. Certainly if he were</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:23:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: A cheap way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#8</link>
<description>I'll be honest here and say I don't know if I'd vote for him, all things being equal among the candidates. &#160;But then, he shares that distinction with any number of other candidates, announced and otherwise, right now. &#160;Is anyone ready to vote for</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:08:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: A cheap way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#7</link>
<description>I won't be voting for Obama. Were Obama white, I wouldn't be voting for him either. Can you say the same thing? &#160;&lt;p>&#10;I doubt it, because if he were white, he would be percieved at most a sort of less qualified version of John Edwards. So why all the h</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:49:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>coquito: Re: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#6</link>
<description>&lt;i>I agree with him on virtually no policies that he has commented on. &#160;To me he is a socialist politician in the Democratic party.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Could you elaborate on that?&lt;p>&#10;I am not well versed on his position on specific policies, but I did find this&lt;a</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:29:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: The first coke snorting President.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#5</link>
<description>The first? &#160;I'm not so sure (RE: Bush). &#160;Say what you will about Bush, though. &#160;He may have tried coke...but he didn't &lt;i>inject&lt;/i>.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:50:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>1fastdog: Re: The first coke snorting President.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#4</link>
<description>&lt;i>Much is being made of Obama's relative inexperience in government as a detriment to his chances. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Aside from the glittering punditry, I doubt that most people could give a rat's ass. The current Weasel-in-Chief is a prime example, although in the</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:47:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: I like MLK, but I would have voted for Malcolm X</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#3</link>
<description>Barack Obama has a way with words and speech that reminds me very much of Martin Luther King. The cadence and rhythm of how he speaks and the issues he speaks on is very similar.&lt;p>&#10;That said -- I agree with him on virtually no policies that he has comment</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:12:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: The first coke snorting President.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#2</link>
<description>You just know his admission that he indulged in a bit of nose candy during his early years will end up being played up and played out by whomever he ends up facing. &#160;Perhaps it won't come down to Hillary or Joe Biden or John McCain getting in his face</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:00:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Don't know much about Obama</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/16/213750/073#1</link>
<description>But I doubt many do.&lt;p>&#10;Quite frankly, at this stage I doubt many Americans honestly even know much about the man besides the fact that he is A) African-American, B) Wrote a &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dreams-My-Father-Story-Inheritance/dp/1400082773/sr</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:51:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>