<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Turning The Corner In The War On Cancer? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/17/132648/628</link>
<description>According to the &lt;a href="http://www.cancer.org/docroot/home/index.asp">American Cancer Society's&lt;/a> annual review of death certificates, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cancer">Cancer&lt;/a> deaths in the United States have &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/conditions/01/17/cancer.deaths.ap/index.html">dropped&lt;/a> for the second straight year.  This year the ACS measured the change from 2003-2004 and found a drop of over 3000 deaths, an eight times larger drop than the 369 fewer deaths found in t</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:34:01 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:05:23 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: DCA</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/17/132648/628#10</link>
<description>I have no clue about the validity of the claims for the drug, but it's clearly worth a good look. &#160;Silly question: why aren't doctors prescribing DCA off-label for otherwise untreatable cases? &#160;DCA's already approved for use in humans to treat la</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:05:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Bah.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/17/132648/628#9</link>
<description>In a world where cancer is a treatable disease, some other health concern would take its place. People who smoke would be less likely to die of lung cancer, and more likely to die of heart debilitation and respiratory disorders. That trend will continue un</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:58:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: Wither Cancer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/17/132648/628#8</link>
<description>Thanks Logan. &#160;I think he is going to beat cancer. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;I was still hoping for a cure to cancer and then the big beach party, hand holding, rainbows, elves, lilac scented unicorns, chocolate and handjobs. &#160;But I'll settle for my brother bein</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:28:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: DCA</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/17/132648/628#7</link>
<description>From my layman's perspective, DCA looks rather believable to me given that a sizable number of people have beaten cancer by removing excess sugars and wheat from their diet and otherwise adhering to macrobiotic principles.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:08:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>logan: Re: Wither Cancer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/17/132648/628#6</link>
<description>&lt;i>Wow Logan, that is one of the most twisted things I have read in a while.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Thank you. You should check out my Christmas letters. I usually manage to work in the term "Hot Carl". &#160;&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>I am not going to believe that cancer brings so much goo</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:32:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: Wither Cancer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/17/132648/628#5</link>
<description>Wow Logan, that is one of the most twisted things I have read in a while. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;Cancer is not the reason we clean up toxic waste or fear nuclear weapons. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;Look people drive cars and honestly want to prevent the nasty emissions for many reasons</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:59:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>harzerkatze: Re: Wither Cancer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/17/132648/628#4</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>Consider the nuclear industry. It's not giant explosions that we fear, it's radiation and toxic waste. Why? They cause cancer. Imagine a world where a simple inoculation or a handful of pills wold make it entirely safe to live next door to a nu</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:35:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rEvolution inAction: Re: Pass the Salt</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/17/132648/628#3</link>
<description>I read about that last week. DCA? something acetate... whatever.. Apparently it works like most other chemotherapies but it doesn't harm healthy cells.. So far they've only seen that reaction in lab rats that had human cancers so the clinical trials (a req</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:42:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>logan: Wither Cancer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/17/132648/628#2</link>
<description>It's funny, Cancer is the ultimate disease. It's the trump card, the Big C, the one that ends all arguments. The cure for cancer has been the holy grail of medical science since treatment for warts and the Evil Eye stopped being Doctors' bread and butter. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:50:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Pass the Salt</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/17/132648/628#1</link>
<description>So very &lt;a href="http://www.healthwriting.com/mouse.htm">skeptical&lt;/a>.&lt;p>&#10;$2 a dose for a product already approved for human use and you say you need $400-600m for human trials? Skeptical.&lt;br>&#10;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:04:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>