Climate Change As Threatening As Nuclear War? Tick-Tock Goes The Doomsday Clock (Trees And Things)

nmiguy: I don't want to believe it

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:18:17 EST

The other day I was reading something Newt Gingrich had said publicly that was pure scare mongering. Curse me for even paying attention to that crap. But I cannot deny tha

thefadd: Re: a blinking 12:00, maybe?

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:38:15 EST

They seem to only consider these eventualities in the collective singular, not the plural.

thefadd: Re: Climate Change As Threatening As Nuclear War?

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:38:06 EST

Considering how aware the public is in regard to the sometimes conflicting information on climate change and global warming, will the inclusion of climate change as a further measuring device, dilute the effectiveness of the Bulletin's anti-nuclear war

gerrymander: a blinking 12:00, maybe?

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:06:19 EST
Most global climate warnings stem from the Earth becoming too hot. Many scientists have theorized that a nuclear weapon exchange will provoke a global freeze. So what happens to the combined nuclear/global warming Doomsday Clock if a nuclear attack foresta

MayorBob: I think I saw that movie.

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:38:41 EST
Didn't Michael Bay film it?

Steve Urkel: Two birds with one stone

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:27:37 EST
"take action now to render nuclear weapons obsolete and to prevent further climate change"
By using all our nuclear weapons to blow up the sun!

rombuu: Ah irony...

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:35:38 EST
..scientists making up someone completely subjective bullshit number for political reasons. I thought they were usually one ones who got upset about that sort of thing.