<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Eleventh Commandment - You Need At Least One Person To Play The Game (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474</link>
<description>At this point it should be recognized that the &lt;a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/">First Amendment&lt;/a> is going to be invoked in cases where states try to erect religious symbols in public places. &#160;Thus, you are not liable to see plaques or monuments with the Ten Commandments etched into them on the courthouse steps. &#160;Why, that business was settled a little over three years ago when then Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:29:30 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:31:14 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: rock beats scissors</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#43</link>
<description>But if you read Jesus' sayings that's exactly what he is complaining about. &#160;People who spend all their time proclaiming their faith &amp; devotion, instead of doing good works.&lt;p>&#10;Thalia</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:31:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: rock beats scissors</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#42</link>
<description>Proclaiming one's faith and devotion is a necessary, but not sufficient, component to doing good works. (Which makes sense, from a human perspective. Christians talk about a "love of Christ" and "a relationship with God." Well, what do people think of thos</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:58:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: old times there not forgotten LOOK AWAY!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#41</link>
<description>The Court was looking at intent. &#160;Guess what, you'd still lose if you "slap" some hide-that-religion crap around it. &#160;As I said, the Courts disagree with you regarding the applicability of the First Amendment to the states (which was your origina</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:37:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: rock beats scissors</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#40</link>
<description>Right. &#160;"They may see your GOOD WORKS," not "they may see the monuments you built to demonstrate your piety." &#160;If the Christians were showing their good works (and last I checked that does not include sending death threats to people who advocate </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:32:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Lay your hands upon the monitor</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#39</link>
<description>&lt;i>What He was couselled against was flashy displays of prayer intended for a human audience instead of prayer which properly revered God:&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I didn't know the devout had such a weak grip on showing off.&lt;p>&#10;Let me help...&lt;p>&#10;Living your life according </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:31:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: old times there not forgotten LOOK AWAY!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#38</link>
<description>Too bad this &lt;a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ANITA-BRYANT-SULTRY-PHOTO-2_W0QQitemZ320066788294QQcmdZViewItem">listing&lt;/a> ended.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:32:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: rock beats scissors</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#37</link>
<description>&lt;i>Showing off faith is not something Jesus believed in, or advocated.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;That's incorrect. Jesus was all for displaying faith, as per Matthew 5:14-16: "Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:57:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: old times there not forgotten LOOK AWAY!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#36</link>
<description>The Court very clearly said that the manner of display among "22 acres containing 17 monuments and 21 historical markers commemorating the "people, ideals, and events that compose Texan identity"&lt;p>&#10;So all they need to do is add some other monuments and ma</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:22:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: rock beats scissors</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#35</link>
<description>I find it appalling that Christians who claim to believe in Jesus can ignore the part about public demonstrations of belief being a bad idea. &#160;Showing off faith is not something Jesus believed in, or advocated. &#160;Then again, a group that can claim</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:19:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: old times there not forgotten LOOK AWAY!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#34</link>
<description>Read the case, and while you're at it, read its companion case McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky. &#160;The Court very clearly said that the manner of display among "22 acres containing 17 monuments and 21 historical markers commemorating the "people, id</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:16:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: What About School Prayer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#33</link>
<description>So you were. My apology. I had read your "new"post without connecting it to its parent post.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Jan 2007 15:40:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: old times there not forgotten LOOK AWAY!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#32</link>
<description>Courts disagree? Explain Van Orden v. Perry.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Jan 2007 15:37:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: old times there not forgotten LOOK AWAY!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#31</link>
<description>How is a display of the ten commandments an "establishment of religion"?&lt;p>&#10;Moses holding the Ten Commandments is depected on the exterior of the Supreme Court. As one former Chief Justice put it:&lt;p>&#10;"Representations of the Ten Commandments adorn the metal</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Jan 2007 15:33:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: rock beats scissors</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#30</link>
<description>&lt;i>I find it frightening that people here accept that the majority rules, and that an intimidated minority has no rights, unless it is willing to put up with the "shit storm."&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Well, I find it appalling that, after the long history of wars, marches a</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:25:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: What About School Prayer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#29</link>
<description>ms_ sue, I'm just keeping with the original question: "Could the good citizens of Dixie County establish a daily reading of the Lord's Prayer to kick off the school day in the public schools?"</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Jan 2007 11:51:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: What I Did On Summer Vacation.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#28</link>
<description>Yeah, I doubt that you'll find many people featuring pictures of Dixie County in the slideshows of their travels -- "Here's a picture of the Sistine Chapel and this is the Mona Lisa and this is the Eiffel Tower and this one is the main sty in Bubba Gump's </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Jan 2007 11:31:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: old times there not forgotten LOOK AWAY!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#27</link>
<description>The Florida constitution also contains this:&lt;blockquote>SECTION 3. &#160;Religious freedom.--There shall be no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting or penalizing the free exercise thereof. Religious freedom shall not justify practice</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Jan 2007 07:32:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Eleventh Commandment - You Need At Least One P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#26</link>
<description>Repeat after me: &#160;You do not have to be brave to be guaranteed your Constitutional rights. &#160;You do not have to be willing to put up with abuse. &#160;It helps if you are strong enough to deal with it, but it is not, nor should it be, a prerequisi</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Jan 2007 03:05:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Two birds...one stone</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#25</link>
<description>What the hell, Gordon...why not just drop that rock on gay athiests...that'll squeeze the gay bug right out of them.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:19:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>lovehate: Re: Eleventh Commandment - You Need At Least One P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#24</link>
<description>There are plenty of counties that have laws, rules, mores, etc. that are of questionable constitutional standing but that doesn't necessarily mean that they should all be immediately challenged in court. &#160;At such time that someone moves in who feels s</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 19:13:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: old times there not forgotten LOOK AWAY!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#23</link>
<description>Unsurprisingly the Courts disagree with you. &#160;But don't let reality interrupt your daydreams. &#160;See the 14th Amendment, and the legislative discussions around it, and of course Gitlow v. New York.&lt;p>&#10;Thalia</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:59:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: early on a frosty morning - LOOK AWAY!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#22</link>
<description>A tourist? Forget about people fearing ridicule and persecution if they come forward and admit being athiests, imagine the ridicule from admitting you went to Dixie County &lt;i>for a vacation&lt;/i>?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:57:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: old times there not forgotten LOOK AWAY!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#21</link>
<description>The 1st amendment was meant to apply to the federal government. The state Constituion of Flordia observes:&lt;p>&#10;"We, the people of the State of Florida, being grateful to Almighty God for our constitutional liberty, in order to secure its benefits, perfect o</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:53:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>stevetherobot: Re: rock beats scissors</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#20</link>
<description>It sounds as if there are at least a few who are too intimidated to complain:&lt;p>&#10;&lt;em>only local residents to come forward have either expressed outright approval for the monument or a &lt;strong>willingness to "support" the FFRF, but not join any official act</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:46:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: Eleventh Commandment - You Need At Least One P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#19</link>
<description>The summary was provided in the press release from the FFRF which stated they need a resident or someone who has business with the county. &#160;I would hazard a guess that if a person with standing is as loosely defined as a tourist or someone hitchhiking</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:38:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Eleventh Commandment - You Need At Least One P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#18</link>
<description>The statement to which I was replying strongly implied that constitutional guarantees do not apply in places where the citizenry does not object to their absence. &#160;I grant that the analogy wasn't the best, but it addressed where this type of argument </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:35:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Eleventh Commandment - You Need At Least One P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#17</link>
<description>Tell that to all the left-wing gun grabbers.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:34:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Eleventh Commandment - You Need At Least One P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#16</link>
<description>One more comment: &#160;The summary is incorrect regarding needing a resident of Dixie County for standing. &#160;They simply need someone who has encountered the monument and objects to it. &#160;It could be a visiting attorney who transacts business in t</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:33:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: I wish I was in Dixie AWAY AWAY</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#15</link>
<description>For the moment, but it's only a matter of time before they start using the six ton monument to crush nonbelievers, making that analogy quite prescient. I've actually sent them an email sugessting this.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:32:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Eleventh Commandment - You Need At Least One P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#14</link>
<description>From the subQ comments: &#160;&lt;i>If you feel the religious are persecuting you by having their values proclaimed, then take up the case. &#160;Make a stand. &#160;Thalia, your comment is without merit. &#160;It slams the religious people of Dixie county wh</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:32:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: Eleventh Commandment - You Need At Least One P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#13</link>
<description>There may be some distinctions between lynching and a display of the Ten Commandments that make your analogy not very persuasive here.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:28:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: rock beats scissors</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#12</link>
<description>That or the folks in Dixie County are just too efficient in intimidating those that oppose their view points.&lt;p>&#10;I find it frightening that people here accept that the majority rules, and that an intimidated minority has no rights, unless it is willing to </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:23:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: What About School Prayer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#11</link>
<description>The "good" citizens of Dixie County can do whatever the heck they want to. &#160;And if they manage to intimidate the opponents of their little excursion sufficiently, they get to keep it too. &#160;Standing is a pretty brightline rule. &#160;The only way </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:20:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Eleventh Commandment - You Need At Least One P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#10</link>
<description>Golly yes. &#160;I mean if all of the citizens in the county approve of the lynching then there isn't anything wrong with it, right? &#160;The Constitution only applies in counties where the citizens support it. &#160;If your county prefers not to have fre</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:17:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: What About School Prayer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#9</link>
<description>I'm not sure I understand what a school has to do with this issue.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:07:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: What About School Prayer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>If there's no resident of Dixie County who is willing to file a suit, would the FFRF be in a similar boat to the canoe they're in with this case?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;If the school's mandate was completely within Dixie County (subsidized only by local government auth</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:30:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: What About School Prayer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#7</link>
<description>God, I'd hope so. &#160;"Sorry guys, we know you all don't like it, but we all have to turn ourselves into the slaughterhouse just like that judge said".&lt;p>&#10;Heck, look at jury nullification for something similar.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:45:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: What About School Prayer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#6</link>
<description>I was thinking along that same line. Can court decisions be effectively ignored if it's the will of every person?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:41:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: What About School Prayer?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#5</link>
<description>Something I wondered about here. &#160;Could the good citizens of Dixie County establish a daily reading of the Lord's Prayer to kick off the school day in the public schools? &#160;I know that SCOTUS ruled that prayer in public school is a no no. &#160;Bu</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:28:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>lovehate: Re: Eleventh Commandment - You Need At Least One P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#4</link>
<description>Regardless of the legal standing of the monument, if no one cares -- to be simple-minded about it -- who cares?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:10:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Re: rock beats scissors</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#3</link>
<description>&lt;i>"If the FFRP is so gung-ho about this issue then one of their members should move to Dixie County, establish legal residency, file a suit and accept the inevitable shitstorm."&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;God knows what they'd find on their front lawn the next day.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:55:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: rock beats scissors</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#2</link>
<description>Contra the last line of the write-up, this is fairly clear-cut as a matter of law, per the Kentucky ruling; were a case to be filed, the Dixie County courthouse would have to remove the monument.&lt;p>&#10;But here's the thing: as a matter of law, "religious monu</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:08:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: Eleventh Commandment - You Need At Least One P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/3/141422/1474#1</link>
<description>Well, if it really bothers some of those people, I'm sure there are houses for sale in Dixie County.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:42:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>