<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Bright future for the compact fluorescent. (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772</link>
<description>A few weeks ago &lt;a href="http://sev.prnewswire.com/retail/20070118/DATH00218012007-1.html">Wal-Mart announced&lt;/a> that they would be turning up their marketing efforts to sell more compact fluorescent bulbs. Today, the state of California has announced that they will be doing something similar; they are discussing the possibility of &lt;a href="http://www.lightboard.com/index.cfm?page=main&amp;frm=article&amp;id=1225">banning the common incandescent light-bulb&lt;/a>. &#160;A 15 watt compact fluorescent bulb prod</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:55:06 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 21:14:35 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#19</link>
<description>Apparently I'm "blessed" with extraordinary hearing. &#160;Or something. &#160;I'll have to try the Home Depot bulbs. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;Thalia</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 21:14:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>snwodttam: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#18</link>
<description>Of all the bulbs in my apartment, these compact fluorescent ones make up the majority (3 of 4). &#160;The rest of my lighting fixtures are regular fluorescent lights in unconventional shapes (circular).&lt;p>&#10;Before using the c.f. bulbs I always hated turning</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 21:03:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#17</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I'm curious about which bulbs you found that don't buzz&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I checked the bulbs; they do make noise, but it's very quiet. So quiet, in fact, that I had to put my ear less than an inch from the bulb to hear it. You'd have to have </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:44:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>juepucta: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#16</link>
<description>Thing is almost all "green" technologies require some sort of investment that makes them seem more expensive at first. The saving comes with time. This applies to light bulbs as well as the way building are, well, built.&lt;p>&#10;So at first at least, when makin</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:20:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ozyman: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#15</link>
<description>Heating via electricity is not nearly as efficient as heating via gas (primarily due to transmission losses I think). &#160;If your house is heated via gas than even that waste heat given off by bulbs is not as efficient as your home furnace. &#160;Also mu</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 15:42:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ozyman: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#14</link>
<description>&lt;i>All said, its not so much that I care about conservation as much as I'm a cheap bastard.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I always say about my Dad, "He was an environmentalist back when it was just called being cheap."</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 15:31:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>socky: Re: n:vision</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#13</link>
<description>Other upside: they don't get hot, so if you have floor-standing lamps and cats on the back of sofas, they can make friends. One of our cats loves ours and says hello several times each evening.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Feb 2007 10:24:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>coquito: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#12</link>
<description>I have a bunch of these at home. My wife's not crazy about them, but she's getting used to it. I think they're great. I have ones that are different "shades" of white. I'm not sure of the technical term, but some are more blue, some are more yellow. In oth</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:59:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Better solutions</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#11</link>
<description>Yes, it is stupid for the state to micromanage all consumer decisions, down to the light bulbs we buy. &#160;If they want to do some social engineering to promote energy conservation, just make the energy more expensive, and let us (the consumers) figure o</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Feb 2007 08:17:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#10</link>
<description>I bought a bunch (bunch ==6) of CF bulbs. &#160;Where they say they are "instant on", well, yeah, if they are already on for a while, yes, they come on right away, but if you come home from a day at work they take a minute or so to come up to full brightne</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 23:22:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#9</link>
<description>I don't get the point of outlawing incandescent bulbs. &#160;That is just going to make it a pain in the ass for those of us who either have a legitimate need for the kind of light that an incandescent produces or who just like them and are willing to pay </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 19:29:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gameCoder: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>I'm curious about which bulbs you found that don't buzz. &#160;I have the Home Depot ones, the GE ones, and the FEIT ones, and all of them have a very low buzzing sound. &#160;I don't notice it immediately, but after about an hour in the same room, it g</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:59:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#7</link>
<description>I'm curious about which bulbs you found that don't buzz. &#160;I have the Home Depot ones, the GE ones, and the FEIT ones, and all of them have a very low buzzing sound. &#160;I don't notice it immediately, but after about an hour in the same room, it give</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:45:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#6</link>
<description>We have some ikea brand CFLs around the house - they're decent and there really isn't any big delay in them coming on (maybe half a second). &#160;They aren't quite as nice as old school bulbs, but they use so much less electricity that it's hard to justif</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:10:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: n:vision</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#5</link>
<description>So far, I've had moderate success with the n:vision bulbs from Home Depot. I've so far only used them in the bathroom and the always on hallways. Upsides: In the bathroom, the "minute to full brightness" is a feature, not a bug. They're quiet. &lt;p>&#10;Neutral:</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:27:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>shane: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#4</link>
<description>Before I found their 60 watt equivalant bulbs I emailed them and asked which ones were equivalant tothe lights that I am used to... they said "it's wastefull to try to light every corner of your house. Send us a layout of your house and we will design a sy</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:18:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rEvolution inAction: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#3</link>
<description>all I noticed was the price.. 50$ for a light bulb..</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 11:43:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#2</link>
<description>&lt;i>The truly energy conscious consumer will bypass the compact fluorescent and switch to LED lights, where you can get a 60 watt equivalent light from an 8 watt bulb! &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Yeah, but they suck at "white" light, or anything in the color spectrum you usual</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:36:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Bright future for the compact fluorescent.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/1/31/133440/772#1</link>
<description>I have, I think, at least three different types/brands of compact fluorescent bulbs in use at my house. There were comments in the submissions queue about buzzing bulbs, and bulbs that don't turn on immediately, but I've found that those problems are only </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:16:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>