<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>International Human Rights Norms and Regional International Organizations [Essay] (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299</link>
<description>International support for human rights has been in the news recently due to the crack-down of the Myanmar military junta on pro-democracy protests over the last week. &#160;It is often assumed that participation in international organizations, such as the United Nations, or regional groupings, such as the Organization of American States, will help socialize states into obeying human rights norms. &#160;In the following essay, I argue that, in fact, international organizations often serve as a cover for huma</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Oct 2007 23:37:42 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:59:08 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: International Human Rights Norms and Regional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#15</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Let's take Burma, for example. You argue that it hasn't complied with international pressure because ASEAN is weak...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I'm sorry if I was unclear above, but that's &lt;i>not&lt;/i> what I was arguing. I am arguing that &lt;i>internatio</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:59:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: International Human Rights Norms and Regional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#14</link>
<description>&lt;i>Will you at least allow that I cleared up the "puzzling" examples of Myanmar and Zimbabwe?&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;I don't agree - I think that your reasoning explains &lt;i>part&lt;/i> of how they got away with what they did, but not the entirety.  Let's take Burma, for e</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:24:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: International Human Rights Norms and Regional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#13</link>
<description>Will you at least allow that I cleared up the "puzzling" examples of Myanmar and Zimbabwe? And if so, can you come up with any other examples?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:44:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: International Human Rights Norms and Regional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#12</link>
<description>&lt;i>the decline of European colonial power over the past century almost certainly has far more to do with the improved human rights situation than any international organization.&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;I agree, but that's not to say that IOs didn't have some impact abov</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:46:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: International Human Rights Norms and Regional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#11</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I think the best argument comes out of the relative lack of willful human rights abuse compared to, say, a hundred years ago&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Oh, and another thing: the will abuse of human rights &lt;i>within&lt;/i> the United States (and many othe</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:55:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: International Human Rights Norms and Regional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#10</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I think the best argument comes out of the relative lack of willful human rights abuse compared to, say, a hundred years ago&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I don't know what metric you would use to make such a determination. But let's look at one major exa</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:37:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: International Human Rights Norms and Regional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#9</link>
<description>&lt;i>is similarly muddle-headed. Who, exactly, are the people who make this assumption? Have they ever been right? &lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;There is a significant body of literature out there supporting this assertion.  Some of it I find more convincing, some less.  I thi</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:15:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: International Human Rights Norms and Regional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#8</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I was trying to explain a puzzle (how weak states are able to avoid pressure by strong states to reform their human rights situations). I did that by arguing that regional IOs provide cover for these weak states, thus mediating criticism and</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:08:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: International Human Rights Norms and Regional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#7</link>
<description>&lt;i>You also wrote, "how can states develop if they faced the constant threat of interference from their neighbors?"  That, of course, is the form of the excuse, and to the extent it is accepted (or believed) by other nations, post-colonial states or otherw</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Oct 2007 22:53:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: International Human Rights Norms and Regional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#6</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I think you missed the context of that line...these regimes cover their actions by appealing to (seemingly) reasonable excuses, a tactic that makes it easier for them to get the blessing of sympathetic regional IOs&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I noticed </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Oct 2007 20:10:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: International Human Rights Norms and Regional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#5</link>
<description>I think you missed the context of that line, or perhaps I didn't make it clear enough.  In any case, that's exactly what my point was - that these regimes cover their actions by appealing to (seemingly) reasonable excuses, a tactic that makes it easier for</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Oct 2007 19:30:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: International Human Rights Norms and Regional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#4</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Does it make sense to go to great extremes to protect the rights of a few when the masses can barely make enough money to survive? &#160;These norms of non-interference allow developing governments to operate with wide latitude, even when th</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Oct 2007 19:07:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: a heartbreakign work of staggering genius</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#3</link>
<description>If I was walking down the street and I some thugs attacking one guy in a wheelchair I would put myself at risk to defend him. But I'm not volunteering to fight to defend the countless number of people being persecuted in [insert name of favorite hellhole].</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:52:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: a heartbreakign work of staggering genius</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#2</link>
<description>&lt;i>1. Human rights is based on the principle that human life has inherent value. While the moorings of such a principle are based in many philosophies/religion, the reality is a bit more nuanced: not all human lives have equivalent value.&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;But "Hu</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:19:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: a heartbreakign work of staggering genius</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/10/2/82942/9299#1</link>
<description>It would be improbable that in the course of a few minutes, I might comprehensively address the ideas raised in this essay. As I am a lazy person, I hope I'll be forgiven to making an attempt to cut to the heart of things.&lt;p>&#10;1. Human rights is based on th</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:40:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>