Global Warming Activists Have A Beef With Meat Eaters (Trees And Things)

thefadd: Re: Rabbits and balls (C-OT)

Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:04:39 EST

I hope the bunny doesn't also own stock in the company that makes the chain because that wouldn't be very smart threat distribution. Of course, I suppose it might as well go whole hog and put all its money there since if the chain breaks, it's done for any

MayorBob: Re: Rabbits and balls (C-OT)

Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:30:17 EST

That bunny must be part cat.

Lou: Rabbits and balls (C-OT)

Thu, 1 Nov 2007 07:59:12 EST

These comments about sucking balls and eating rabbits inspires me to write about my neighbor's pet rabbit. His name is Foo Foo (yes, that Foo Foo). But I call him Free Range Bunny.

gerrymander: Re: Greenpeace can suck my balls

Thu, 1 Nov 2007 00:38:02 EST

I flip back and forth on whether I consider myself an environmentlist depending on whether I've heard someone from Greenpeace and their allies or a Republican speaking about the environment last.

Let me guess: each one sends you screaming in the

Shy Elf: Re: Greenpeace can suck my balls

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:46:45 EST

I really think Greepeace wants us all to live as vegetarian Amish. I flip back and forth on whether I consider myself an environmentlist depending on whether I've heard someone from Greenpeace and their allies or a Republican speaking about the envir

pO157: Re: Greenpeace can suck my balls

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:49:45 EST

Almost everyone recycles here (Chicago suburbs). The chief incentive appears to be that when you put out your trash to be picked up, everyone can see whether you've been recycling or not. It's really the lack of disincentives which make thi

Shy Elf: Re: Greenpeace can suck my balls

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:21:15 EST
Almost everyone recycles here (Chicago suburbs). The chief incentive appears to be that when you put out your trash to be picked up, everyone can see whether you've been recycling or not. It's really the lack of disincentives which make this wo

gerrymander: Re: Greenpeace can suck my balls

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:34:56 EST
It's not so much taking orders from, so much as a rejoinder to. Environmental advocates appear thrilled to make their concerns an ethical issue. Well, I've got my own ethics, which now includes a Green version of "lead by example."

thefadd: Re: It'll never happen

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:33:00 EST
Maybe they can suck a vegetarian's balls instead. All they eat are vegetables. Therefore, they are vegetable...just descriptive of how little sense it makes to base your diet on political appeal in such broad strokes. Wasn't this buying things far away as

thefadd: Re: Greenpeace can suck my balls

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:25:40 EST
You're an idiot for allowing Greenpeace to dictate your personal choices.

Lou: It'll never happen

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:06:30 EST
Greenpeace can suck my balls
Hello? Greenpeace...vegetarians? Duh!
(And you're welcome, btw)

pO157: Re: Greenpeace can suck my balls

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:00:05 EST
Guess how many people recycle?
Six.

port1080: Re: Greenpeace can suck my balls

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:03:17 EST
Recycling is almost as silly in Delaware. There's absolutely no incentive - you pay a flat rate for trash pickup, so if you recycle there's no cost savings. There's actually an extra charge for curbside pickup (the unincorporated parts of DE do

pO157: Re: Greenpeace can suck my balls

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:46:52 EST
I've enacted a personal rule about personal behavior changes in the face of environmental concerns: I will make no change unless a) I get a immediate cost benefit without degrading my lifestyle, or b) I can point to a significant lifestyle change which

gerrymander: Greenpeace can suck my balls

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:21:33 EST
I've enacted a personal rule about personal behavior changes in the face of environmental concerns: I will make no change unless a) I get a immediate cost benefit without degrading my lifestyle, or b) I can point to a significant lifestyle change which aff