<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Is Dexter Too Dark? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70</link>
<description>Sure you kids, a serial killer as hero sounds like fun, until someone ends up in pieces in garbage sacks.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:16:39 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 10:55:01 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Nameless Cynic: Re: Can't get into it</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#21</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>I'm curious what you consider creative enough to warrant your attention.&lt;/blockquote>Don't get him started. He's still torn up because they cancelled "Full House."</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 10:55:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Is Dexter Too Dark?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#20</link>
<description>This is subject to interpretation, but I always thought of Patrick Bateman as basically a guy stuck in an empty world, and all the killing he did was his imagination at work. &#160;In my view, Dexter and Patrick are two very different people. &#160;Bateman</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:29:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ozyman: Re: Clarifications</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#19</link>
<description>&lt;i>Harry Morgan. If the guy was so moral, so talented at getting away with crime, and so confident Dexter was beyond redemption...&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;The do address this in the second season and part of the answer is that Harry Morgan wasn't a paragon of morality. &amp;nb</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:23:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Clarifications</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#18</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; As should be very clear from the write up, I haven't seen a single episode of the show, just some of the snippets that are on Youtube. Whether or not I ever will is up in the air; gruesome images, especially in film or TV, have a bad tendency</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:22:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Spoliers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#17</link>
<description>We should have a spoiler tag. &#160;I prefer white on white text (shows up on highlight), but text which appears only on click is also OK.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:33:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>logan: Re: Is Dexter Too Dark?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#16</link>
<description>Mmmm....no. Patrick Bateman is an amoral monster who wants to fit in with his yuppie friends and enjoy the fruits of an upper-class urban lifestyle: exotic sex, gourmet food, luxurious surroundings, a life of comfort. His station in life affords him the me</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:33:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Pulp Vs Noir</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#15</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; You could add a whole lot of names to your list, if you poked around books for a while. The Executioner series, by "Don Pendleton" has not only run to over 300 books on its own, but created two other franchises (Stony Man, and Mack Bolan Adve</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:32:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: FYI</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#14</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; If you check the Wikipedia entry, Dexter uses two pseudonyms from Brett Easton Ellis books as aliases: Dr. Patrick Bateman (from &lt;i>American Psycho&lt;/i>, in order to order the tranquilizers that are his "magic" weapon*, as well as Sean Ellis o</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:03:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ozyman: Re: Is Dexter Too Dark?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#13</link>
<description>&lt;i>A TV-MA version would be so cleaned-up and dumbed-down that it would be unwatchable.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I wonder about that. &#160;It seems like violence is completely acceptable on network television. &#160;I have not seen them, but co-workers tell me that the Sop</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:10:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>logan: Re: Is Dexter Too Dark?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#12</link>
<description>Meta, I originally posted this in the subq, not realizing what you have to do to viewsubq comments.&lt;p>&#10;NO SPOILERS! NO SPOILERS!&lt;p>&#10;I'm putting off reading the book until the series has run its course.&lt;p>&#10;Look, if we can root for Tony Soprano what's so dif</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:32:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ozyman: Re: We Don't Get ShowTime</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#11</link>
<description>After my posting frenzy, I went and checked out the wikipedia article on the show. &#160;The critical reception section was interesting:&lt;br>&#10;&lt;blockquote>The initial response to Dexter was positive. The website Metacritic calculated a score of 77 from a pos</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:50:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ozyman: Re: We Don't Get ShowTime</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#10</link>
<description>I would certainly think it's worth the $28 it is currently going for on Amazon (free shipping). &#160;I've already seen the first season, and I might buy it just to see the extras. &#160;If it sounds like something you'd like, then my guess is you probably</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:44:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ozyman: Re: Can't get into it</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#9</link>
<description>&lt;i>It is not creative enough to warrant my attention. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I'm curious what you consider creative enough to warrant your attention. &#160;There is some decent television out there, but very rarely do I see anything that I'd consider 'creative'. &#160;&lt;p</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:39:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: We Don't Get ShowTime</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#8</link>
<description>Would you say it is worth buying a boxed set of DVDs to catch it? I have only heard good things about it so far.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:35:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ozyman: The best show on television</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#7</link>
<description>Not much to add, but my wife and I think it's the best show on television right now. &#160;We watched initially because we were six feet under fans. &#160; Between the two shows, I think this really shows Micheal C. Hall's talents. &#160;The characters he </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:28:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Can't get into it</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#6</link>
<description>The cable company called a few years ago and offered Showtime for $5/month, forever, and like an idiot I said yes. &#160;At the time I was interested in watching Queer as Folk; I didn't realize that show had jumped the shark years earlier. &#160;Now, all S</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:09:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Is Dexter Too Dark?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#5</link>
<description>The character you describes sounds an awful lot like the main character from American Psycho, albeit possibly more likable to the audience. Having not seen Dexter myself, are there any other similarities you could draw out between the two? (Supposing of co</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:08:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>3fingerspointback: Re: loved Season 1</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#4</link>
<description>&lt;i>The only thing which strikes me as a bit weak is that (at least in season 1) all he kills are serial killers.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I haven't seen any &lt;i>Dexter&lt;/i>, but I do read the &lt;i>Punisher&lt;/i> comics, which suffers from the same problem. &#160;Just how many cri</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:28:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: loved Season 1</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#3</link>
<description>I saw Season 1 when it first came out and although the supporting actors skills are a bit weak in parts, the great, wonderful thing about Dexter is that it had a coherent story line. Unlike say "Lost" or "Heroes" or even (blasphemy) "Battlestar Galactica" </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:44:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Is Dexter Too Dark?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#2</link>
<description>The actually killings are only a minor part of the show, so I doubt a PG version would detract all that much. &#160;It's not the blood and gore of the killings, it's the fact that we know he is a serial killer and nobody else seems to notice, that gives th</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:38:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gameCoder: Re: Is Dexter Too Dark?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/12/12/212319/70#1</link>
<description>Having just finished season 1 two days ago (I'm of the mind that Netflix is more worth the money than any channels outside of basic cable), I can easily say that Dexter rules! &#160;Honestly, in general I don't think there is too much gore for network tv (</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:57:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>