<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Virginia Is For Lovers ... And Suicidal Undergraduates. (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://suicideandmentalhealthassociationinternational.org/suiandcollstud.html">Suicide is the second leading cause of deaths of college students&lt;/a> and is &lt;a href="http://www.afsp.org/files/Misc_/CollegeSuicides060802.pdf">nearing "epidemic proportions."&lt;/a> (pdf doc) &#160;In light of the increasing body counts, many schools are slowly coming to grips with the problem and beginning to set up programs aimed at identifying potential suicides in order to get them help before they make an attempt on </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:43:54 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:22:23 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>MizDarwin: Re: Virginia Is For Lovers ... And Suicidal Underg</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#16</link>
<description>I'd hate to be the dean charged with fighting both student suicide AND grade inflation. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:22:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>dzetetes: Re: Let's go to the numbers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#15</link>
<description>&lt;i>Now, what is an acceptable level of suicide on college campuses? &#160;1? 200? &#160;1200? &#160;2000?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;However many it takes for me to be able to consistently find a good parking spot.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:00:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: It's more than one death, isn't it?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#14</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...it isn't an epidemic; it was hyperbole, on my part, for wording that first sentence the way I did&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>On the contrary, I think you accurately captured the tone of the SMHAI article that breathlessly proclaimed a "alarming suic</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:31:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: The envelope please</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#13</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>"Dodging a question with sarcasm after digging himself into a hole"&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Oh, were you posing a serious question when you asked "At what point does this become a problem worthy of attention?"&lt;p>&#10;Here's my serious answer: when the r</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:26:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: The envelope please</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#12</link>
<description>And the winner in the catagory of "Dodging a question with sarcasm after digging himself into a hole" is...&lt;p>&#10;rip rip&lt;p>&#10;zyxwvutsr!</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:15:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: It's more than one death, isn't it?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#11</link>
<description>But, you're absolutely right, it isn't an &lt;i>epidemic&lt;/i>; it was hyperbole, on my part, for wording that first sentence the way I did. &#160;But, really, am I not allowed one hyperbolic, irrelevant word in a write up? &#160;I ask you this in all fairness </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:13:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Let's go to the numbers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#10</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>what is an acceptable level of suicide on college campuses...At what point does this become a problem worthy of attention?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I cannot believe you are dismissing deaths by unintentional injuries in such a cavalier manner. Have y</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 06:16:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Virginia is for losers, do the math</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#9</link>
<description>The life of a kid in college is worth at least 3 times as much as the life of a loser who isn't in college, which means it is indeed an epidemic.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:26:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Let's go to the numbers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>How many "kids" are there at Virginia's public colleges and universities?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I don't know about you, but anyone who is 20 years or more younger than me qualifies as "kid". &#160;Are you opening the suicide can 'o worms?&lt;p>&#10;At least you're not wound </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:42:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jxg: Re: Let's go to the numbers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#7</link>
<description>&lt;i>Personally, I think we as a society should do whatever we can to help prevent kids from committing suicide&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;How many "kids" are there at Virginia's public colleges and universities? Or any colleges and universities, for that matter?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:37:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Let's go to the numbers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#6</link>
<description>&lt;i>I see your point, and you're right: even a single suicide is an epidemic.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Is it just the word "epidemic" that has your panties in a bunch? &#160;Ok...forget the word. &#160;Now, what is an acceptable level of suicide on college campuses? &#160;1?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:20:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Let's go to the numbers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#5</link>
<description>Well, since the story is about college kids who kill themselves, I thought that's where we were focusing. &#160;If the bridges and cliffs of upstate New York are attractive sites for kids (college and non-college, I would assume) to commit suicide, then pe</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:09:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Let's go to the numbers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#4</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>how many deaths does it take to get to the compassion center of your tootsie roll?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I see your point, and you're right: even a &lt;i>single&lt;/i> suicide is an epidemic.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:05:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Let's go to the numbers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#3</link>
<description>Compassion is relative. Shitloads of kids have been killing themselves for years at all those schools in upstate New York with the beautifully scenic cliffs and natural bridges.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:06:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Let's go to the numbers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#2</link>
<description>Hey Rombuu and Z...how many deaths does it take to get to the compassion center of your tootsie roll?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:26:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: Virginia Is For Lovers ... And Suicidal Underg</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/23/183333/104#1</link>
<description>"The suicide rate on campus, estimated to be about 7.5 per 100000 students, is about half that in non students the same ages." &#160; That's from the PDF on the 2nd link...&lt;p>&#10;...that's funny ol' definition of "epidemic" isn't it? &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:26:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>