<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Colts Beat Bears, 29-17 (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413</link>
<description>Most of you probably watched &lt;a href="http://www.superbowl.com/">Super Bowl XLI&lt;/a>. If not for the game, then for &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/browse?s=sb">the ads&lt;/a>, or to watch Prince do the halftime show, or just to have an excuse for a party.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:53:01 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:22:36 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Colts Beat Bears, 29-17</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413#12</link>
<description>Yeah, the Bears were totally in that game. Both INTs weren't just regular pick offs, they were Rex Grossman super special crappiness. Even the fumbles would have been forgiven if he could have put either one of those passes somewhere other than the absolut</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:22:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: Colts Beat Bears, 29-17</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413#11</link>
<description>Two words. &lt;p>&#10;Devin Hester. &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 13:36:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: Colts Beat Bears, 29-17</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413#10</link>
<description>Oh I disagree. &#160;The Bears defense did show up. &#160;They caused many turnovers in the first half and kept the game close. &#160;But they were on the field the whole game because of Rex Grossmans crappiness. &#160;Any defense would have been spent aga</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 13:35:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Colts Beat Bears, 29-17</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413#9</link>
<description>None of the commercials deserved a "best of" this year. Nobody seriously tried except maybe the car commercial about the assembly line robot committing suicide. Kinda like the game. With all those awful turnovers on both sides, aside from maybe Joseph Adda</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 13:02:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>1fastdog: Re: Colts Beat Bears, 29-17</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>Best commercial? Nationwide's K-fed spot.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Personally, I liked the Blockbuster ad with the animals dragging and clicking the the "mouse" and I also like the winning amateur video for Doritos dubbed &#160;&lt;a href="http://promotions.yahoo.com/dorito</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:35:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Colts Beat Bears, 29-17</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413#7</link>
<description>Yes, Grossman was terrible, but the Bear's defense didn't show up either. &#160;We've had several games this season that were won on defense alone. &#160;Not to say that would have been the case against the Colts if the defense had shown up, but at least w</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:31:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: If The Bears Only Had A QB.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413#6</link>
<description>Unfortunately, they had to settle for Rex "I Know I Can Fit This Pass To My Receiver Covered By Three Defensive Backs" Grossman. &#160;Therein lies the tale of this game. &#160;When the Colts had the ball, they played sharp and smart. &#160;In the odd circ</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:14:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: Colts Beat Bears, 29-17</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413#5</link>
<description>You know I didn't even think of that, I just thought it was a cool silhouette of Prince with his symbol guitar. &#160;I thought Prince's performance was fantastic. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;Rex Grossman was pathetic. &#160;He did not belong in the game. &#160;Lovie Smith </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 11:16:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Colts Beat Bears, 29-17</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413#4</link>
<description>We had 14 people crammed into my living room, and we were all glued to the set. &#160;But then again, as Chicagoans, we had a horse in this race. &#160;At most other Superbowl parties I've been to nobody much cared about the game, but then again, neither d</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:55:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: I'm glad I live in a country...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413#3</link>
<description>The press here in Chicago are surprised Grossman didn't win the MVP - for the Colts.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:45:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Colts Beat Bears, 29-17</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413#2</link>
<description>Best commercial?  Nationwide's &lt;a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=r0sAC24oHuY">K-fed spot&lt;/a>.&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;Worst commercial?  That hair color one.  Too long, didn't make sense, and who the fuck advertises hair color products (for women!) during the Super Bowl?&#13;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:37:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: I'm glad I live in a country...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/5/21633/01413#1</link>
<description>...where a black head coach can lose the Super Bowl because his white QB sucks.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:24:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>