<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>What Comes After Afterthekiss.com? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/6/145634/7463</link>
<description>It was a simple and seemingly clever idea from the marketing folks at Masterfoods USA, maker of the Snicker's candy bar.  Premier a &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHkoZ7ngAM0">new commercial&lt;/a> during the Super Bowl showing two manly men working on a car, have them accidentally "kiss" while eating a Snicker's bar, and then direct viewers to a website (the astutely named afterthekiss.com) to see alternate endings of what happened "after the kiss."</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:51:34 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:29:05 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: What went on Afterthekiss.com?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/6/145634/7463#11</link>
<description>&lt;i>Are you giving strategic advice for the gay rights movement here, or are you expressing support for Snickers?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Eh, neither. &#160;I am just expressing my opinion, or rather defending my opinion of "big deal". &#160;I figure I've said too much on a</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:29:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: What went on Afterthekiss.com?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/6/145634/7463#10</link>
<description>Where are the bunched panties of which you speak? &#160;It's not like I launched a March on Washington over this. &#160;Snickers emitted a crass and objectionable advertisement into the culture, and that gives everyone the right to complain.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>You see,</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:47:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: What went on Afterthekiss.com?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/6/145634/7463#9</link>
<description>Okay so it was an advertisement targeted at bigoted people. &#160;So? &#160;Do you think that some non-bigoted person will see this and suddenly be like "yeah, y'know snickers is right, gay people are just plain icky"? &#160; &lt;p>&#10;My point is, what's the bi</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:12:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>logan: Re: What Comes After Afterthekiss.com?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/6/145634/7463#8</link>
<description>What I find interesting is that our heros' first reaction after kissing another man was to wax their chests. OK, technically they ripped out some chest hair, but it works out the same. The Steve Martin/John Candy buddy comedy &lt;a href="http://imdb.com/title</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 01:05:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Back in the days of yore</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/6/145634/7463#7</link>
<description>From the subq...&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>Remember when gays had a sense of humour? (I'll take Paul Lynde in the center square to block.)&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I can't speak for the rest of the tnt folks, but I remember the &lt;a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=aA20dKc3kK8">good old days&lt;/a></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:59:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: What went on Afterthekiss.com?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/6/145634/7463#6</link>
<description>First of all, I like this place and everything, but a rant on TNT does not yet equal "publicity."&lt;p>&#10;Second of all, I have an even more paranoid suspicion about their motive than you have. &#160;This wasn't a publicity ploy. &#160;This was advertising targ</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:26:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>dzetetes: Re: What went on Afterthekiss.com?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/6/145634/7463#5</link>
<description>I'm not sure that the conventional wisdom that any publicity is good publicity applies when you're trying to sell a product that people don't need and to which there are many tasty alternatives. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;I suppose we'll see what happens to sales of Snicke</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:54:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: What went on Afterthekiss.com?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/6/145634/7463#4</link>
<description>&lt;i>So, wtf? &#160;Is Snickers hiring skinheads to write its ad scripts? &#160;I don't care if it never aired; they've got a long-haired predatory homosexual on screen, and they don't realize that's problematic until a gay guy calls them up? &#160;And, excu</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:38:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: What went on Afterthekiss.com?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/6/145634/7463#3</link>
<description>The Afterthekiss.com web site featured video of NFL players watching and commenting on the ad. &#160;Among &lt;a href="http://www.afterelton.com/TV/2007/2/superbowl.html">their comments:&lt;/a>&lt;blockquote>As Desmond Clark watches the ads he reacts with "Whoa! Wh</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:21:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: missed opportunity</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/6/145634/7463#2</link>
<description>Yeah but just look at the whole advertising campaign they had going on before that. A 20-30 something black guy sitting at a desk with a middle aged white guy asking can I help you enjoy that snickers then he serenades him. Before that it was the whole fir</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:37:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: missed opportunity</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/2/6/145634/7463#1</link>
<description>I discussed this ad with my friends, and we all agreed that this was a missed advertizing opportunity. You could have done the same ad in a corporate boardroom with a guy and a girl engaging in "the kiss" , while one snicker bar is left on the table to be </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:33:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>