<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Note to Woody Allen:  Avoid Ohio (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/1/175820/6260</link>
<description>It's been described (with more than a dollop of black humor) as "the activity the entire family can enjoy." &#160;But, &lt;a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/incest">incest&lt;/a> is, in fact, one of mankind's &lt;a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanId=sa003&amp;articleId=C7C87ECC-E7F2-99DF-39AEFF3D7D1A8CFB">strongest  genetic social taboos&lt;/a>. &#160;The law varies from one place to the next when it involves cousins. &#160;But, when it comes to the closest relationships, it's a crime. &#160;It's that way in </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:23:12 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:14:59 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>tomc: Why?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/1/175820/6260#10</link>
<description>Why can't guys just learn to control themselves?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:14:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Note to Woody Allen:  Avoid Ohio</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/1/175820/6260#9</link>
<description>&lt;i>Woody Allen is a dick for marrying his step daughter.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I was kind of surprised a few years back that &lt;i>The Onion&lt;/i> didn't do one of his "headline-only" bits for him, along the lines of, "Woody and Soon-Yi Adopt Future Third Mrs. Allen". </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:48:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>coquito: Re: Note to Woody Allen:  Avoid Ohio</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/1/175820/6260#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>You mention incest laws are meant to protect "children against a broader class of persons who can exert a parental role." &#160;Soon-Yi is not a child.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I don't think the issue is so much whether or not Soon-Yo is a child, but whether or not there</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:38:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: Note to Woody Allen:  Avoid Ohio</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/1/175820/6260#7</link>
<description>I agree, and I think I was trying clumsily to get across that it isn't so cut n dried. &#160;Liek Woody and Soon Yi Previn. &#160;This is his step daughter, Mia Farrow adopted her, there is no blood tie. &#160;Woody and Soon Yi get hitched. &#160;In Ohio t</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:26:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>shatov: Re: Note to Woody Allen:  Avoid Ohio</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/1/175820/6260#6</link>
<description>The telling qualification of the step-father-daughter relationship, in the opinion, is this:&lt;br>&#10;&lt;blockquote>The opinion read that, had Lowe divorced his wife, the family bond would have been broken, but because he was still married to his stepdaughter's m</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 04:45:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>charlies: Re: Please forgive me</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/1/175820/6260#5</link>
<description>Your sister doesn't happen to be Anne Coulter, does she?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 01:34:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Please forgive me</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/1/175820/6260#4</link>
<description>It's interesting really. I experience the described total revulsion when even try to think about sex with sister. Think is almost too strong a word. I can't let it linger in my head that long. But when I hear other people talk about doing it with their sib</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 20:35:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>coquito: Re: Note to Woody Allen:  Avoid Ohio</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/1/175820/6260#3</link>
<description>There's a little more to it though. As even the dissenting opinion noted, there is a need (at least as expressed by the law) to protect "children against a broader class of persons who can exert a parental role." In other words, we have other laws that pro</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:51:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: Note to Woody Allen:  Avoid Ohio</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/1/175820/6260#2</link>
<description>Incest is just plain icky. &#160;But a step dad and step daughter don't have a genetic tie. &#160;They have a familial tie, but "families" really vary in nature from unit to unit. &#160;The risk to the family unit really can only be judged on a case by cas</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:16:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Please forgive me</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/1/175820/6260#1</link>
<description>I don't know what strange flaw exists in me that I feel compelled to tell this joke...but compelled I am so here goes...&lt;p>&#10;A young man steps out of the bathroom with just a towel around his waist. &#160;His sister, clad only in a robe playfully snatches t</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:06:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>