<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Your Freedom or Your Life (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720</link>
<description>You may recall the case of &lt;a href="http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2004/11/23/raichVAshcroftAGuideToTheS.html">Raich v. Ashcroft&lt;/a>, the case decided by the Supreme Court 6-3, in which a woman having multiple severe medical problems was denied the right to grow and use marijuana. &#160;The case was remanded by the Supreme Court to the Ninth Circuit.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:39:12 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 08:27:07 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>davidcomass: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#44</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://blog.ifrance.com/photosexe3/post/320058-chansons-gratuit">chansons gratuit&lt;/a>&lt;br>&#10;&lt;a href="http://blog.ifrance.com/photosexe3/post/320057-chanson-gratuit">chanson gratuit&lt;/a>&lt;br>&#10;&lt;a href="http://blog.ifrance.com/photosexe3/post/320056-chal</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 08:27:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>davidcomass: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#43</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://blog.ifrance.com/photosexe3/post/320058-chansons-gratuit">chansons gratuit&lt;/a>&lt;br>&#10;&lt;a href="http://blog.ifrance.com/photosexe3/post/320057-chanson-gratuit">chanson gratuit&lt;/a>&lt;br>&#10;&lt;a href="http://blog.ifrance.com/photosexe3/post/320056-chal</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 08:21:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>davidcomass: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#42</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://blog.ifrance.com/sexegratuit2/post/320036-bondage">bondage&lt;/a>&lt;br>&#10;&lt;a href="http://blog.ifrance.com/sexegratuit2/post/320035-blowjob">blowjob&lt;/a>&lt;br>&#10;&lt;a href="http://blog.ifrance.com/sexegratuit2/post/320034-blonde">blonde&lt;/a>&lt;br>&#10;&lt;a href="</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 08:14:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>picsou: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#41</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://www.moralvaluesmyass.com/absolutDVDSEXE/">u1&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://www.moralvaluesmyass.com/adulteDVDSEXE/">u2&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://www.moralvaluesmyass.com/adultesDVDSEXE/">u3&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://www.moralvaluesmyass.com/aimeDVDSEXE/">u4&lt;/a> </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 May 2007 04:10:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Ah-HA!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#40</link>
<description>&lt;i>(After I corrected it at the courthouse, the next summons was still misspelled. I didn't respond.)&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;So now the truth comes out, Mr. Incuv&#233;e Blick!</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:24:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: My Experience</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#39</link>
<description>&#160; &#160;I got called once, and served, even though they misspelled my last name. (After I corrected it at the courthouse, the next summons was still misspelled. I didn't respond.) Masters degree in English, and I've never had a license or owned a car </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:53:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: jury nullification?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#38</link>
<description>Well I've reported for jury duty four times. &#160;Three times I was not selected for any jury after answering only basic questions about my identity, education, and occupation. &#160;The fourth time I got thrown out for pamphleteering.&lt;p>&#10;Funny thing. &amp;nb</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:47:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: jury nullification?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#37</link>
<description>I doubt it very highly that it was because you were an engineer. &#160;And I say this as someone with not only an engineering degree, but also a law degree. &#160;Around here, every jury has an engineer on it, unless the engineer deliberately gets off the </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:00:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: jury nullification?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#36</link>
<description>The handbill I like to pass around talks about the history of juror abuse, racism, and so forth. &#160;It's pretty balanced and historically accurate as far as I have determined. &#160;The basic point of the literature is that our system is built so that t</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:56:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: jury nullification?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#35</link>
<description>That and jury nullification has been successfully used to acquit people accused of lynching blacks in the South. &#160;Be realistic about the power of jury nullification. &#160;It's not about protecting turf.&lt;p>&#10;I consider people who deliberately try to ge</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:41:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: jury nullification?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#34</link>
<description>I've found that a quite reliable method of avoiding jury duty is to start passing out jury nullification literature in the anteroom. &#160;I have a nice 1-page folded pamphlet that works perfectly. &#160;And since I happen to believe in juries as a sort of</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:53:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>shatov: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#33</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>Much like the communists, they assume that people will, as my toddler was taught "get what they get, and not throw a fit." &#160;People are naturally selfish and materialistic.&lt;/blockquote>&lt;br>&#10;Generally people are not selfish, but jealous -- t</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:13:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#32</link>
<description>Libertarians are crazy not because they don't have enough followers, but because most Libertarians seem to not have the faintest idea about how human motivation works. &#160;Much like the communists, they assume that people will, as my toddler was taught "</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:26:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#31</link>
<description>&lt;cite> But then almost everywhere here also has a patio where you can smoke. &lt;/cite>&lt;p>&#10;That would be an acceptable compromise IMHO. Of course, that might not work as well on the east coast in the winter, especially in windy areas, but many bars around her</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:29:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#30</link>
<description>&lt;cite> There are no "conservatives" anymore. &#160;The people who now control the Republican party believe in "less government help for them" and "more government handouts for us." &#160;They believe in "smaller government for the purposes of doing social </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:14:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Not Just East</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#29</link>
<description>&#160; &#160;If you drive more than two miles off of I-5, it used to be that you could step back into the '50s rather easily. Democrats who want to thrive in this setting tend to be more conservative than those from &#160;the Seattle area, which is why I'm</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:55:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: jury nullification?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#28</link>
<description>&#10;&lt;ol>&#10;&lt;li value="1">&#160;Jury nullification is something that is hard to get in front of the jury. &#160;Yes, in the abstract, the jury can nullify a law, i.e. vote based not on whether the law was violated, but whether the law was acceptable. &#160;Howev</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:25:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Look A Little South</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#27</link>
<description>"I would have to quibble over the notion that Washington is "liberal". "&lt;p>&#10;I know Eastern WA is righty, but the WA as a whole is liberal enough that if liberals wanted a marijauna initive to pass it would. I agree with your take on the views of younger de</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:03:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>shane: Re: jury nullification?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#26</link>
<description>Is anyone familiar with jury nullification of laws? &#160;Couldn't she have won this case with a jury instead of a judge? &#160;Jury's I believe can find that the law should be struck down even when a judge can't.... I think... &lt;p>&#10;Another questions... whe</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:47:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#25</link>
<description>&lt;i>This does provide an out for a mom &amp; pop type bar, but how many of those are left in NYC?&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;In Los Angeles, I know of 3. But then almost everywhere here also has a patio where you can smoke.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:49:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#24</link>
<description>Because it's actually a labor regulation, I agree with it. It's not a ban on smoking and it isn't enforced as such. It's designed to ensure that all laborers are as free from work place toxins as possible. Just because the public goes somewhere doesn't mak</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:33:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#23</link>
<description>&lt;cite> The law against smoking in California bars and restaurants is actually a labor regulation, specifically California Labor Code Section 6404.5(b). If the only people who work the bar are the bars owners and they have no employees, then neither they no</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:30:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#22</link>
<description>The law against smoking in California bars and restaurants is actually a labor regulation, specifically California Labor Code Section 6404.5(b). If the only people who work the bar are the bars owners and they have no employees, then neither they nor their</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:27:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Look A Little South</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#21</link>
<description>&#160; &#160;Washington may have never tried decriminalization*, but the Oregon Marijuana Initiative was always in the news when I was growing up in the 80s, and even made the ballot a few times. If you want to hang an argument about the popularity of lega</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:47:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: How popular is it really?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#20</link>
<description>I wasn't thinking the random signers so much as the person who starts the initiative going... but if nobody firebombed the house of the guy who started the gay marriage initiative, it's probably a moot point. &#160;Thanks.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:33:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: How popular is it really?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#19</link>
<description>I've never heard of anything like that happening to anyone in WA, even after controversial inititives like repealing 'affirmative action', homosexual marriage, and medical marijana. I assume the signatures are public record, I imagine in order to get them </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:18:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: How popular is it really?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#18</link>
<description>I suspect no one in a good position to do so wants to put their name on such an initiative. &#160;A little smoking among friends is one thing, but does anyone with a professional career want a reputation as "that nutjob who wants to legalize pot"? &#160;I </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:45:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#17</link>
<description>&lt;i>My question is thus: What the &lt;bleep&gt; happened since then, or was the lovable Mrs. Griscoll smoking a thick doobie herself before class?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;The paleocon dinosaurs pretty much all died in the CELE (Conservative Extinction-Level Event) known as </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:31:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: How popular is it really?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#16</link>
<description>Given that marijuana has been illegal for quite a lot of years, it's a schedule I drug (stating it has no medical uses whatsoever) having 11 states pass laws legalizing the use of medical marijuana over the last 10 years is pretty broadly indeed. &#160;Esp</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:31:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#15</link>
<description>Corporate? &lt;p>&#10;Like a corporate owned Ruby Tuesday's franchise bar/grill. Which I will never drink in again.... they know what they did.&lt;br>&#10;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:23:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: How popular is it really?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#14</link>
<description>26% is "quite broadly"? I know the topic is primarily about medical marijauna, I find it interesting how so many people who have used the MJ themselves, and are tolerant of others using it, remain reluctant to legalize it. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:50:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: How popular is it really?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#13</link>
<description>11 states have &lt;a href="http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/pop/StatePrograms.htm">legalized medical marijuana&lt;/a>, and two more have removed prosecution for it. &#160;This is a medical marijuana case, not a "should drugs be freely available" case. &amp;nbsp</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:42:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Here Come da Judge</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#12</link>
<description>I don't know if he's a Republican or a Democrat, and Bog knows how he'd rule on the issue in his courtroom, but one robed rogue really likes his &lt;a href="http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/broward/sfl-319judgekorda,0,6079116.story?coll=sfla-news-browar</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:36:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: How popular is it really?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#11</link>
<description>I spoke of politicians above, I forgot to mention that in many states, like Washington, there is also an inititve process, that voters could use to bypass politicians and legalize marijuana. This hasn't happened, even though Washington is solidly Democrati</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:20:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#10</link>
<description>What is a non owner-operated bar? &#160;Some sort of sentient bar? &#160;Advanced AI? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:15:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#9</link>
<description>&lt;cite> That's more reasonable. What bothers me more (OK almost as much) as the inconvience and ruining of my bar experience is how accepting people are of the government bossing them around in an area where it's none of the governments business. &lt;/cite>&lt;p></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:49:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#8</link>
<description>That's more reasonable. What bothers me more (OK almost as much) as the inconvience and ruining of my bar experience is how accepting people are of the government bossing them around in an area where it's none of the governments business.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:11:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#7</link>
<description>In my town, if the bar is owner-operated, they can decide to allow smoking indoors. This is actually quite a successful avenue, I think.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:07:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#6</link>
<description>A bar is a private space. But because of the ban in my town smokers have to leave the bar to stand on the sidewalk exhaling on innocent passers-by. Then we throw or cigarette butts on the ground. Enjoy.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:58:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#5</link>
<description>There are no "conservatives" anymore. &#160;The people who now control the Republican party believe in "less government help for them" and "more government handouts for us." &#160;They believe in "smaller government for the purposes of doing social works" </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:57:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#4</link>
<description>I'm all for prohibiting marijuana smoking in public spaces. &#160;I'm actually allergic to smoke, and yes that includes smokes from bonfires, fire places, cigarettes, and pot. &#160;But what you do in your own private spaces, is a different matter. &#160;&lt;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:54:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Misinformation, and the Fear Factor</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#3</link>
<description>These two forms of manipulation are what keeps marijuana from being dealt with in a rational manner in the USA.&lt;p>&#10;Upon reflection, these two forms of manipulation are what keeps a LOT of things from being dealt with in a rational manner in the USA.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:48:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#2</link>
<description>While there is only one Republican in national office I can think of (Ron Paul) who wants to repeal drug laws, there are more conservatives than you think who would like to see them reformed. See The Feb, 1996 issue of &lt;a href="http://www.nationalreview.co</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:32:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Your Freedom or Your Life</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/17/4819/61720#1</link>
<description>I have a question.&lt;p>&#10;I was informed in high school history and political science class that in general, conservatives in this country were for "smaller government" and less interference in personal affairs.&lt;p>&#10;My question is thus: What the &lt;bleep&gt; h</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:11:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>