<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Guns are fun (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495</link>
<description>There are two kinds of people in this world. Those with guns, and those who do the digging.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:22:51 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:43:12 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#47</link>
<description>&lt;i>Have you ever shot any non-Glock .40's? I sometimes think because Glocks have a steep grip-angle for some people lots of recoil gets transfered into the soft part of the hand.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I haven't shot any other .40s, no. &#160;I fired a .45 enough to "know</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:43:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#46</link>
<description>9mm is for sissies. Have you ever shot any non-Glock .40's? I sometimes think because Glocks have a steep grip-angle for some people lots of recoil gets transfered into the soft part of the hand. I knew a guy who shoots .357 revolvers all the time and he f</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:50:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ozyman: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#45</link>
<description>There is a law that dangerous cleaners and medicines have child safety tops (or I assume there is a law - since every product comes like this). </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:49:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#44</link>
<description>&lt;i>Because of pressure from the Feds lots of small gun dealers got their supplies cut off, that seems to have affected prices too.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Exactly. &#160;Exacerbated by being out in the boonies, where if you can't shoot a "bar" with it, most places don't ca</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:08:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: Gun Storage</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#43</link>
<description>&lt;i>Perhaps it could be bolted to the wall? &#160;I have lived in drywalled apartments where I needed to put shelves up...when I moved it just spackled the holes, threw on some "landlord off-white" paint, and went on my merry way.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;That could work... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 07:30:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#42</link>
<description>I'd forgotten how expensive things got during the ban. Because of pressure from the Feds lots of small gun dealers got their supplies cut off, that seems to have affected prices too. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;All I own now days is a little SIG P228. It's a fun piece, that</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:46:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Gun Storage</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#41</link>
<description>Hey HC, I hope this does work for you. &#160;Perhaps it could be bolted to the wall? &#160;I have lived in drywalled apartments where I needed to put shelves up...when I moved it just spackled the holes, threw on some "landlord off-white" paint, and went o</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:11:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#40</link>
<description>&lt;i>Just curious, what's your $800 gun? Target pistol?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;A Glock 22 with a sight upgrade, 2 15 round magazines and all the miscellaneous junk a first time gun owner needs, back during the ban when the 15 round mags were expensive as hell. &#160;(Now yo</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:07:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: Gun Storage</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#39</link>
<description>&lt;i>What's wrong with one of these?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;It's a wee bit light at 64 lbs... I'm a renter, I can't floor-mount the thing (otherwise I'd buy one of &lt;a href="http://www.stack-on.com/securityplus/pistol_ammo/gc-900-5.html">these&lt;/a>) and I'm loath to trust a g</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:05:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#38</link>
<description>Why is there no law requiring household cleaners or medicines be kept in safes? Children cand and do get into those and die from it.&lt;p>&#10;"1 $800 gun"&lt;p>&#10;Just curious, what's your $800 gun? Target pistol?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:34:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Gun Storage</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#37</link>
<description>&lt;i> I'm not in a position to spend thousands on a proper 500+ pound gun safe (nor am I inclined to do so to store 1 $800 gun),&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;What's wrong with one of &lt;a href="http://www.llbean.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?storeId=1&amp;catalogId=</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:57:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#36</link>
<description>&lt;i>I'd like testing for sanity, ability to safely use a weapon, and ability to safely store the weapon.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I certainly fail your first test and pass your 2nd, but what in your mind qualifies as safe storage? &#160;My gun is stored unloaded in a reasona</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 06:29:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#35</link>
<description>I am going to have to go ahead and say that would be a jurisdictional issue and the aliens would have to take up the gunpowder supply legality of your operation with you and not the Feds. In fact, I'd be moderately sure the feds wouldn't care about your op</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 08:12:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#34</link>
<description>Given that there are many thousands of crimes committed with guns every year, it's a shame the gun owners can't secure their weapons so that they're not easily available to the burglar.&lt;p>&#10;Thalia</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 05:34:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rEvolution inAction: Re: Guns are ghun</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#33</link>
<description>I wasn't talking about the AWB.. I was under the impression that there was a law regarding AK and AK look-alike weapons.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:50:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#32</link>
<description>I do think there is an individual right to own weapons, BUT I think that we do have the right to "well regulate" that ownership. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;I do worry about the insane guy, maybe because I know one of the lawyers who were killed by a crazy ex-client with a </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 01:35:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Kicking Lizard Ass</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#31</link>
<description>I was around 8 when I saw this. &#160;8 year olds don't have to suspend reality when they watch tv because there is no reality. &#160;I was relieved to see Kirk kick the lizard guy's ass...but NOT kill him. &#160;How cool was that?&lt;p>&#10;But I still don't kno</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:02:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>dzetetes: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#30</link>
<description>It looks like you have to have a type of &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Firearms_License">Federal Firearms License&lt;/a> to manufacture firearms and ammunition. &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:33:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Re: related quirk</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#29</link>
<description>&lt;i>Could you carry a stick of dynamite with a lit fuse?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Yes, but only for short periods of time.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:27:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: related quirk</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#28</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...you could legally carry, among other things, large fixed blade knives&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Could you carry a stick of dynamite with a lit fuse? That's a hell of a weapon.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:23:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: WTF?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#27</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...bonus points for referencing one of my favorite Star Trek episodes...but why?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Why is it one of your favorite episodes? I have no idea. (Maybe you like guns?)</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:08:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: related quirk</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#26</link>
<description>You used to be able to get a "Concealed &lt;b>Weapons&lt;/b> Permit", which meant you could legally carry, among other things, large fixed blade knives. At some point they restricted it to just handguns. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:07:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: WTF?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#25</link>
<description>Ok, bonus points for referencing one of my favorite Star Trek episodes...but why?</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:00:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#24</link>
<description>That's funny (and in a sense, aren't we all in a life or death battle with our own metaphysical lizardman?), but it makes me wonder. While it's legal to buy guns and ammo from neighbor, I'm not sure if it's legal for me to manufacture a gun and gun powder </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:00:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#23</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Obviously this doesn't apply if you buy a used handgun from an indvidual, or to the purchase of shotguns and rifles&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>What if you were kidnapped by a pacifist alien race with far superior technology, and were purposely stranded</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:53:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#22</link>
<description>If you purchase a handgun from a licensed dealer you only have to pass the Federal background check and wait five days. Obviously this doesn't apply if you buy a used handgun from an indvidual, or to the purchase of shotguns and rifles. &lt;p>&#10;Unlike more res</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:45:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#21</link>
<description>&lt;i>Something like 50% of guns used in crime were obtained through burglary or theft.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I find it shameful that in This Great Country, criminals cannot afford to buy guns, and must therefore resort to theft.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:54:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>coquito: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#20</link>
<description>I don't mean this to be snarky, though it may sound like it, but are you required (in your state or any) to pass any written or practical (physical?) tests to show you understand gun safety and can actually use one safely? Is there any kind of insurance ne</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:36:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#19</link>
<description>So you do think there is an individual right to own guns?&lt;p>&#10;"I'm worry about the insane guy"&lt;p>&#10;In my state you don't have to prove you are sane to buy a gun, or get a CPP, and it seems to work OK. You don't have to prove you are sane to get a drivers lic</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:23:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Guns are ghun</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#18</link>
<description>Owning "assault weapons" was never illegal.&lt;p>&#10;The AWB defined certain guns as "assault weapons", then banned banned the manufacture and sale of new guns that met this definion, as well as all magazines with a capacity of more than 10 rounds. As I mentione</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:15:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#17</link>
<description>My big problem isn't guns per se, it is the lack of regulations on who can own a gun and how that person stores that gun. &#160;I'm not worried about a sane individual owning one or more guns which he or she stores sufficiently safely that neither children</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:40:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rEvolution inAction: Re: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#16</link>
<description>We don't agree very often, but you've got an amazing point regarding armed bodyguards. It's no real surprise, the rich control everything.. so why not the firepower?</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:11:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rEvolution inAction: Re: Guns are ghun</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#15</link>
<description>I was under the impression that they were banned specifically in the mid-late 80's but I cannot find any source for this. I'm going to conclude that I was misinformed.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:05:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rEvolution inAction: Re: Guns are fun</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#14</link>
<description>Machine guns aren't really man-portable in a non-squad sense.. but yes, we need access to those as well. I'm serious about what I meant here. I believe that we need access to all the weaponry needed to fight a modern military.. but am opposed to handguns (</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:02:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: guns for hire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#13</link>
<description>I think many, if not most, of those who argue the 2nd Amendment is a collective right did not conclude this after examing the historical record. They want to impose a ban guns, and seized upon and twisted the "well regulated" phrase as a way to do this. &lt;p</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:20:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Guns are ghun</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#12</link>
<description>"The second amendment states that the reason people need to bear arms is in order to have a militia"&lt;p>&#10;As this ruling points out, that isn't the case.&lt;p>&#10;"now its only AK's that are illegal"&lt;p>&#10;The assault weapons ban expired. And ownership of AK's was ne</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:18:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Guns are fun</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#11</link>
<description>That aside, do you think the judges in this case did properly decide the scope of the 2nd Amendment?</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:06:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Go For the Hat Trick Gordo...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#10</link>
<description>I may do that. It's difficult for me not rant about injustice when the subject of smokes comes up though.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:03:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>arromdee: Re: Guns are fun</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#9</link>
<description>It's hard to tell when people are being snarky because they're making a joke but don't care about the facts, or whether they're being snarky as a way of making a point.&lt;p>&#10;There is no such thing as an "assault weapon" in any meaningful sense. &#160;The inf</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:17:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: It had to be said:</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>I don't own a gun; my ancestors were Quakers!&lt;/i>&lt;br>&#10;</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 10:06:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: Guns are fun</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#7</link>
<description>The SUB is easier to park.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 05:19:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rEvolution inAction: Re: Guns are fun</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#6</link>
<description>Why a SUB? Why not an SUV?</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:47:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Guns are fun</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#5</link>
<description>The dissent gives the Supreme Court, which has been ducking this issue for 70-some years a nice little out:&lt;p>&#10;Although "the Constitution is in effect . . . in the District,"&lt;br>&#10;O'Donoghue v. United States, 289 U.S. 516, 541 (1933) , as it&lt;br>&#10;is in the S</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:21:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Re: Guns are fun</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#4</link>
<description>I tend to think more strategically. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;I believe we have the right to bear nuclear attack submarines.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:10:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rEvolution inAction: Re: Guns are fun</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#3</link>
<description>I was all for the ban on handguns but against the ban on assault weapons. The second amendment states that the reason people need to bear arms is in order to have a militia. An assault weapon would be helpful in cases where the militia would be needed (now</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:34:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Re: Go For the Hat Trick Gordo...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#2</link>
<description>Given we're talking about liquor, guns and smokes, maybe calling it a trifecta would be more appropriate.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Mar 2007 22:22:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Go For the Hat Trick Gordo...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/3/9/142445/3495#1</link>
<description>Liquor, check.&lt;br>&#10;Guns, check.&lt;p>&#10;I look forward to your upcoming story on smokes.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:51:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>