<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Baby Hatches: Recycling the Children in Real-Time (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315</link>
<description>Even the most jaded "think of the children" snarks among us will have to admit that baby abandonment is a ghastly and horrible thing...for both the mother and the baby. &#160;Is there another way?&lt;br>
</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:56:11 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 08:21:23 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: Hatches?  We don't need no steenking Hatches!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#21</link>
<description>&lt;i>Does this ENCOURAGE mothers and fathers to abandon their kids? &#160;Maybe.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I'll go half a step further (and likely off the ledge). &#160;Any would-be parents that really want to drop off their baby in a nice safe baby hatch probably should.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 08:21:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>permazorch: Re: This Man Has Really Hit On Something</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#20</link>
<description>"You're not too big that I can't squeeze you into that hatch!"</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 04:15:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: tomato tomahto</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#19</link>
<description>We use the term "player" in our contracts, although the agreements are called "Agreement for Test with Pilot and Series Options -- SAG Actors," "Actors" being the plural used to refer to a group of male and female "players." That pic is still of a dude, th</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 13:24:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Hatches?  We don't need no steenking Hatches!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#18</link>
<description>No serious;y folks, much ado, but overall not a bad idea. &#160;I mean, IDEALLY every mother and father would want to keep their baby and be able to care for and raise their baby. &#160;But in REALITY it is much different. &#160;We hear shocking stories of</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 11:58:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>humorlesscretin: Re: Good Idea</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#17</link>
<description>That's because it &lt;strong>is&lt;/strong> a microwave oven. &#160;Hospital baby food... for babies, from babies.&lt;p>&#10;[It's official, I'm going to Hell for that joke.]</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 10:10:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: tomato tomahto</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#16</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>It seems that the word actor is used for either men or women&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Not on rferl.org. They use the standard dictionary definition, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor#The_words_actor_and_actress">as explained on Wikipedia&lt;/a</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 08:42:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: This Man Has Really Hit On Something</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#15</link>
<description>don't forget to install a toilet in his/her room...right in front of the screen.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 22:10:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>dzetetes: Re: This Man Has Really Hit On Something</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#14</link>
<description>Warcraft &lt;i>is&lt;/i> the baby drop. &#160;Give a kid a game card and a couple boxes of ramen, and you'll never hear from him again.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 21:27:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: tomato tomahto</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#13</link>
<description>It seems that the word &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor">actor&lt;/a> is used for either men or women.&lt;p>&#10;Checkmate</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 19:43:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: This Man Has Really Hit On Something</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#12</link>
<description>They need to build one big enough for teenagers. That'll keep 'em in check. Stop playing warcraft or it's off to the baby drop!</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:59:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: tomato tomahto</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#11</link>
<description>If that's a woman, the only thing more depressing is hearing that &lt;a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20070515_A_kindergarten_legend.html">your kindergarten teacher retired&lt;/a>.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:50:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: tomato tomahto</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#10</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I see an ugly woman...you see a guy in a dress&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>The caption clearly says "actor." If you see a woman, then he's quite a good actor, I'd say.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 17:41:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: tomato tomahto</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#9</link>
<description>&lt;i>I wasn't talking about the ugly photographer in the background. I meant the man wearing a dress and string of pearls, pretending to be a woman.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I see an ugly woman...you see a guy in a dress. &#160;To each his own...you'll get no judgment from me</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 16:09:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Anonymously throwing out a child is unacceptable.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#8</link>
<description>On the first day of its operation in Japan a father used it to drop off his 3 year old pre-schooler son. "&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/05/16/baby.drop.ap/index.html">Anonymously throwing out a child is unacceptable,&lt;/a>" according to the </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:52:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Cultural Attitudes</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#7</link>
<description>I fucking hate Bruce Springsteen for espousing exactly those types of morals in all his putrid, worthless music.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:43:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Cultural Attitudes</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#6</link>
<description>&#160; &#160;I don't know that it's so much that women have all the rights- though the courts often rule that way in custody cases- but that there's a long cultural acceptance for men leaving their families, one that's gone on for centuries. For a lighter </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:36:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Good Idea</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#5</link>
<description>But it looks like a microwave oven.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:04:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: The insanity of balanced perspective and bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#4</link>
<description>In most cases in which babies are abandoned or given away, the mother is unwed and the father may not even know that he has a baby, and typically doesn't care even if he does know. &#160;If he did care, he would probably have married the baby's mother, or </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 09:43:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Baby Hatches: Recycling the Children in Real-T</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#3</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Yeah z...ugly chicks are a riot. &#160;How could I have missed that?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I wasn't talking about the ugly photographer in the background. I meant the man wearing a dress and string of pearls, pretending to be a woman.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 09:32:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: The insanity of balanced perspective and bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#2</link>
<description>Take any particular topic/story and there are bound to be critics. Homes for puppies? We're spending too litle money on humans. Free lottery tickets for voting? We're encouraging the vice of gambling.&lt;p>&#10;Nevertheless it seems that the moral and religious o</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 06:07:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Akashi Kaikyo Bridge</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/13/115739/315#1</link>
<description>They need to make things like this for drunk people to climb into. &lt;p>&#10;Seriously though, this is yet another example of how the Japanese do us one better by actually putting some thought into things. Kind of like the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 01:08:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>