Another evolution controversy (Trees And Things)

thefadd: Re: Another evolution controversy

Sat, 26 May 2007 18:19:32 EST

I don't know why I confused that. Maybe the pantheses confused me when I was googling specific names of examples. Substitute It's Only Rock 'n' Roll (But I Like It) or (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction.

skeptic: Re: Another evolution controversy

Sat, 26 May 2007 08:18:49 EST

I hadn't thought of that, but now that you mention it, my plastic surgeon does have an oddly gray skin color.

Of course, if extraterrestrials are harvesting human noses in plastic surgery clinics, then it is still true that the reports of UFO abductions

thefadd: Re: Another evolution controversy

Fri, 25 May 2007 14:58:27 EST

Unless they just wanted to farm us for our noses, in which case they'd simply open plastic surgery chains

shane: Re: Another evolution controversy

Thu, 24 May 2007 00:34:45 EST

(although one could argue that despite all the abuses and tragedy of the European conquest of North America, today's native American population is better off having the advantages of modern civilization rather than living in a neolithic culture)

Admit The Woods: Re: Another evolution controversy

Tue, 22 May 2007 16:36:37 EST

Jeez, I really hope nobody thinks I actually believed my theories? That would be embarrassing.

In reality, and on a more serious note, there are numerous slightly more tenable theories surrounding the alien abduction phenomenon, some that posit childhoo

skeptic: Re: Another evolution controversy

Tue, 22 May 2007 08:57:54 EST

Any hypothetical non-human species could accomplish more through direct and open contact with us, than they could by stealthy and secret abductions or other sneaky activity designed to avoid a free flow of information, commerce, or other interactions. &nbs

3fingerspointback: Answer is obvious:

Tue, 22 May 2007 02:50:14 EST

3. There's no need to use all that expensive Stealth technology when the creatures you're studying have no radar to detect it. That would be like bringing in a duck blind to study E. Coli. As for the changes in interior technology,

Some Guy: Re: Another evolution controversy

Mon, 21 May 2007 00:18:55 EST

Well, sure, that's one possibility is that they are post-human visitors from the future warning us to stop fucking up our environment. The explanation that I find most convincing is There have been numerous reported encounters with "extraterrestrials" which strongly resemble traditional sightings of leprechauns, pixies, fairies, and dwarves. The maj

Admit The Woods: Re: Another evolution controversy

Sun, 20 May 2007 13:54:26 EST

Two alternative theories:

A. All those little folk, what we alternately call leprechauns, pixies, fairies, etc., have evolved just as we have. Instead of hanging around large dodgy mushrooms smoking interesting foliage, they developed technology just li