<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Granite State Method For Stopping Office Gossip - Fire The Gossiper (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358</link>
<description>How you react to this story will likely be determined by how you feel about office gossip. &#160;Is it a harmless pastime; just another innocent opportunity for friends to share interesting information and idle chitchat? &#160;Or is it a potentially corrosive, if not slanderous, activity which can negatively affect innocent people's lives? &#160;We'll let you be the judge of what it is in &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3199506&amp;GMA=true">the case of the Hooksett Four&lt;/a>. </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 08:43:36 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:18:07 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Depends on the Gossip</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#13</link>
<description>Employment in the US is never completely at will. True at will employment would me there was never an inappropriate reason to fire someone.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:18:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Depends on the Gossip</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#12</link>
<description>It's funny to me how often employers screw that up. Employment typically is at will and yet people manage to go out of their way to find innapropriate reasons to fire people all the time.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 14:04:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: Depends on the Gossip</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#11</link>
<description>So you think the gossipers deserved a chance to either right what was wronged by them or to change their behavior? &#160;That is not unreasonable, except that if it were a sexual harassment by a man, he would be out right quick. &#160;Should there be a dou</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 09:53:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Depends on the Gossip</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#10</link>
<description>But in this case the gossip was work related, they were talking about someone who had gotten a raise, and suggesting that it may have been for non-work-related activities with the boss. &#160;I think this is a big step towards the fired-if-you-say-somethin</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 07:56:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>permazorch: Re: Granite State Method For Stopping Office Gossi</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#9</link>
<description>I love to gossip, I'm ashamed to admit. &lt;br>&#10;I love our story polls, I'm not ashamed a bit.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 16:57:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Depends on the Gossip</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#8</link>
<description>I think it should fall under the general realm of any other negative office behavior like poor performance or basic sexual harrassment. A person has to be apprised of and given the opportunity to improve upon the things that their boss or coworkers do not </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 14:31:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: Editing Of Polls.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#7</link>
<description>Thanks for the answer and for adding the choice to the poll. &#160;You're, of course, absolutely right about restricting the ability to editors.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 21:38:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>3fingerspointback: You know, *I* heard it was just the tipping point</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#6</link>
<description>Reading between the lines (and one of the ABC reader comments), the fired women come across as unpleasant, stupid and incompetent people. &#160;Exactly the types who would see someone younger than them get promoted, then conclude that it could only have be</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 21:15:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>1fastdog: Re: Editing Of Polls.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#5</link>
<description>&#160;&lt;i>I'm wondering if there might be any way of allowing for some sort of community edit to a poll? &#160;Not to allow the ability to remove a question but rather giving everyone a single chance to add a question?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Polls may be edited at will by </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 20:59:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: I Hear Ya</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#4</link>
<description>&#160; &#160;I spent most of a day (here and there) dickering over the Squirrel Nut Zippers sub, finding links and pondering the flow. By the time it was all over, all the gaps in my writing were getting larger and not smaller ("papers are never finished, </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 18:46:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: In the real world</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#3</link>
<description>&lt;i>"Gossip, whispering, and an unfriendly environment are causing poor morale and interfering with the efficient performance of town business." &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I'm a fan of at-will employment. If you want someone to no longer work for you, then you fire them. No m</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 14:30:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Depends on the Gossip</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#2</link>
<description>If the gossip in the office is related to work and working conditions, I think it is fair game. &#160;If there are rumors that someone will get a raise and be your new boss, or if there are rumors of lay offs or some organizational change, or massive chang</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 10:45:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Editing Of Polls.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/23/94313/3358#1</link>
<description>There was an excellent point made by uncarved block in the subqueue regarding the poll I threw together on this sub. &#160;He suggested adding another choice to the poll:&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>I think gossiping is wrong, but have done it because sometimes it's the only wa</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 09:02:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>