<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Sheehan Done (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679</link>
<description>After almost 3 years of peace activism and &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/31/sheehan.arrest/index.html">several arrests&lt;/a> since propelling herself to the center of the Iraq Debate, activist Cindy Sheehan has decided to remove herself from further protest activity.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 06:55:58 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:13:53 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#53</link>
<description>&lt;i>I'm not attacking her...&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>talk about someone with absolutely nothing to contribute to anything -- and the notion that what you have to say is worth a shit just because you lost a child is revolting in the extreme.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>I'd say her whole ca</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:13:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Vietnam ahead on points</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#52</link>
<description>We might be better off if the number were 19k. The enduring story of this war is going to be the amazingly high (already 15k+) number of seriously wounded veterans who are going to require million of dollars and lifetimes of medical attention. The reason A</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:11:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Potential worse than nothing</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#51</link>
<description>If Sheehan's son had been killed in Afganistan, it might be worse...not that we shouldn't be there, that's where we should be focusing our efforts. &#160;I believe that had we used the resources wasted on Bush's little adventure going after the real perps </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:25:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Out of curiosity...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#50</link>
<description>If Spc. Casey Sheehan had been killed on the front in Afghanistan do you think that would have changed the results of the poll? What about Ms. Sheehan's original jaunt into activism?&lt;br>&#10;</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:56:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Vietnam ahead on points</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#49</link>
<description>According to this &lt;a href="http://www.militaryfactory.com/vietnam/casualties.asp">site&lt;/a> the count of deaths at the 4 year mark was 19,365. &#160;Certainly much more bloodshed than we enjoy now in Iraq.&lt;p>&#10;It's hard to say about the publishing of said go</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:25:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Agreeing in spirit</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#48</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Were there more "embedded" journalists in 'nam, or were the ones on the front just more apt to publish gorey video than now?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>There was far more gore, by any measure, to talk about in the Vietnam War than in Iraq. About sixtee</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Jun 2007 12:56:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Agreeing in spirit</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#47</link>
<description>Were there more "embedded" journalists in 'nam, or were the ones on the front just more apt to publish gorey video than now? Or was it just that society was not "desensitized" to the violence as some claim we are now?</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Jun 2007 09:16:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Agreeing in spirit</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#46</link>
<description>Don't discount the effect that daily images of death in Vietnam and images of caskets being flown home had on people in coming out actively in revulsion to the violence perpetrated on others by their government. If we had such images pushed on us daily, th</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Jun 2007 02:59:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Agreeing in spirit</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#45</link>
<description>One would think that would have an effect...if Americans actually cared. &#160;Oh sure, we give Bush low marks for just about everything, but by and large, that's where it ends. &#160;The war isn't touching enough people directly...funny thing too what wit</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 19:04:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Jackkeefe: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#44</link>
<description>&lt;i>only served to strengthen Bush because it helped people to understand that so many of the hard-core antiwar folks are almost completely divorced from reality.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;There is something to that, at least as it relates to me, whose only recently come arou</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 18:43:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: I don't know Ken.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#43</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...what do you have to say about the architects of the war that cost Sheehan her son...?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Normally I would wait for a discussion that was about "the architects of the war" before going out of my way to write a comment about th</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:18:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: The debate won't be affected</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#42</link>
<description>If anyone really wanted to end the war, they'd be parading the armless, legless and faceless vets on television or at least youtube every day.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:17:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>3fingerspointback: The debate won't be affected</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#41</link>
<description>But hopefully the Anti-War movement will. &#160;It's important to read &lt;a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/28/12530/1525">Sheehan's statement&lt;/a> to understand that her frustration is not really with the Bush Administration or the American public</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:10:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: I don't know Ken.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#40</link>
<description>This is how you describe her: &lt;i>"batshit crazy and mean-spirited"&lt;/i> and her and her supporters are &lt;i>"lying and/or paranoid and naive."&lt;/i> &#160;Even if I grant you that, what do you have to say about the architects of the war that cost Sheehan her so</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:02:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#39</link>
<description>I'm not attacking her... someone said she never engaged in "the politics of personal destruction" and I was just providing a counter-example.&lt;p>&#10;This is America.. she can call people whatever she wants and believe whatever crazy shit she wants to.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:49:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#38</link>
<description>Rombuu, she may be hysterical, she may have a few loose screws, but cut the woman a break, she lost her son, who did Bush lose? &#160;Bush doesn't even go to any of the funerals. &#160;Won't even look at pictures of the caskets. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;As far as I'm con</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:20:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#37</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>When will the madness end?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>It will carry on irregardless of our pour powers to stop it with.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:13:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Hah!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#36</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Listening to neocons talk about sensitive and compassionate discussion is like listening to a David Duke lecture on race relations&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>If you say so. I personally do not pay much attention to either.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:11:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: I don't know Ken.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#35</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>But, to me, speculation (lies if you must) about the reasons for the war made by those who had no part in its coming to be is several orders of magnitude less damaging than the lies and bullshit fantasy than an administration hell bent on ge</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:10:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#34</link>
<description>This whole discussion is turning into a spectacle of poor English usage. &#160;Consider: &#160;in comment #7, WMK employs a run-on sentence, which rombuu then complains about. &#160;In comment #18, rombuu then tells us "her and W have a lot in common" whic</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 08:59:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: I don't know Ken.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#33</link>
<description>But, to me, speculation (lies if you must) about the reasons for the war made by those who had no part in its coming to be is several orders of magnitude less damaging than the lies and bullshit fantasy than an administration hell bent on getting rid of Sa</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 07:55:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Well shoot...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#32</link>
<description>&lt;i>You, sir, are a vulgar, uncouth lout&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Be that as it may...but I'm still right.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:14:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#31</link>
<description>Well dodged my friend...well dodged.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:13:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Well shoot...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#30</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Stop wrapping your criticism of Sheehan in a cloud of misplaced pity...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>It's not misplaced: the poor woman lost her son. That's a tragic event to any normal human.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...brand her a treasonous cunt and move on </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:07:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#29</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...Jim Hightower&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Oh, come on: I said intelligent &lt;i>and&lt;/i> coherent.&lt;br>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>And those lies are...?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Well, for example, the idea the the war in Iraq was started for the benefit of a small subset of </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:03:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#28</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>And what reality is that?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>The reality, for example, where, for instance, Donald Rumsfeld is so obviously not a murderous tyrant that no mature, sane person would compare him with Stalin or Hitler.&lt;br>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Careful w</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:58:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#27</link>
<description>&lt;i>Name two.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Molly Ivens...Jim Hightower.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>No, Sheehan became part of the cacophony of lies. Anti-Bush lies are still lies, you know.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;And those lies are...?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:51:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Hah!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#26</link>
<description>&lt;i>Instead we got Sheehan and her ilk: batshit crazy and mean-spirited.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Listening to neocons talk about sensitive and compassionate discussion is like listening to a David Duke lecture on race relations.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:47:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Well shoot...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#25</link>
<description>Pity is only condescension for the weak. &#160;Stop wrapping your criticism of Sheehan in a cloud of misplaced pity...brand her a treasonous cunt and move on or shut up. &#160;Z...there is no high road your folks can take in this war...best to just come ou</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:43:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#24</link>
<description>&lt;i>so many of the hard-core antiwar folks are almost completely divorced from reality.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;And what reality is that? &#160;The reality that Bush and Co. lied their fucking asses off to get us into the war...and once in the war miss handled on every leve</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:40:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Well shoot...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#23</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Does this include the rest of the neocon movement?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Do neocons deserve our pity? I dunno. I guess so. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:37:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#22</link>
<description>&lt;i>I'd say her whole campaign would have to be branded a failure.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;See, that's the big downfall for you Neocons...you can only think in the short term. &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:37:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Yeah?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#21</link>
<description>&lt;i>""The biggest terrorist in the world is George W. Bush," &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;You know what? &#160;She's right. &#160;Oh sure...we love to hate folks like Osama Bin Laden and any fucking Iranian...but Bush wraps himself in an aura of patriotism and downhome folksy w</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:35:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Well shoot...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#20</link>
<description>&lt;i>She's deserves no such thing. She is ignorant and spiteful and specious and probably not of sound mind. She deserves our pity, but not our respect.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Well hell, then. &#160;Does this include the rest of the neocon movement?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:31:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: It's true!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#19</link>
<description>&lt;i>served to strengthen Bush&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Lol! &#160;You really haven't met a fascist you did like, have you?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:29:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#18</link>
<description>Considering her whole platform was that the troops should leave Iraq, and considering there are more troops there than every before, I'd say her whole campaign would have to be branded a failure.&lt;p>&#10;In fact, her and W have a lot in common, as much as she'd</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 20:59:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#17</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>You don't believe in fighting fire with fire?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I do, actually, but that's because it's a proven method for forest fires. Fighting lies with more lies, however, is ineffective and will often have no other effect than to get one</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 18:33:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#16</link>
<description>&lt;i>Instead we got Sheehan and her ilk: batshit crazy and mean-spirited.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;You don't believe in fighting fire with fire?&lt;p>&#10;And for the record, there have been plenty of intelligent, coherent anti-war voices. &#160;Sheehan's was heard only because her </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 18:13:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#15</link>
<description>Perhaps it could have been that low before now if there had been any intelligent, coherent antiwar voices. Instead we got Sheehan and her ilk: batshit crazy and mean-spirited.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 17:53:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#14</link>
<description>Yeah, what's that "strengthened Bush" polling at these days? &#160;Something like 28%?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 17:39:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#13</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Yeah, plus she got part of her fame from criticizing Dear Leader&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I'm guessing you don't know what bathos is. Sheehan got famous for criticizing Bush, that's true. But the content of her criticism was inapt and illogical and o</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 17:27:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#12</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...it took the death of her soon for her to gain a certain level of political awareness. However, once she gained that awareness&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>How's this for "political awareness"? &lt;blockquote>&lt;tt>"We are waging a nuclear war in Iraq right</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 17:22:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#11</link>
<description>Yeah, becoming an outspoken focal point for those that consider the Iraq war effort to be nothing more than a neocon circle jerk contributed absolutely fucking nothing.&lt;p>&#10;I mean, most Americans &lt;i>still&lt;/i> believe being in Iraq is the right thing. &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 16:47:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Sayonara, &quot;Mother Sheehan&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#10</link>
<description>Remember, back when Sheehan became a going concern, how so many chose to wax rhapsodic about the "absolute moral authority" Sheehan had? Do you think any of them are going to follow her lead and stop their anti-war campaigning, the only intellectually hone</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 16:40:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Rombuu Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#9</link>
<description>Rombuu, have you no decency? &#160;Cindy Sheehan may have been a shrill and annoting outspoken activist, but she was sincere, she suffered great loss and she led herself to ruin over her political beliefs. &#160;The woman lost not only her son, but her mar</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 15:07:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#8</link>
<description>I suspect your 3rd paragraph contains a run-on sentence.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 14:59:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>WMK: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#7</link>
<description>Where does moral authority come from?&lt;p>&#10;I would think one obvious form of contribution would be to raise a healthy child encouraged to &#160;believe in their country enough to serve in its armed forces. &#160;How is that contribution 'nothing'? &#160;&lt;br></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 14:45:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#6</link>
<description>&lt;i>she was a vocal and tireless campaigner for her cause and did not engage in the politics of personal destruction.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;""The biggest terrorist in the world is George W. Bush," -- Cindy Sheehan&lt;p>&#10;Yeah, she's a doll.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 13:39:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#5</link>
<description>Everyone in America is free to express their opinion. It is a sad fact for her that it took the death of her soon for her to gain a certain level of political awareness. However, once she gained that awareness, she was a vocal and tireless campaigner for h</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 12:55:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#4</link>
<description>&lt;i>"and the notion that what you have to say is worth a shit just because you lost a child is revolting in the extreme."&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I agree. However the same tactic has been used by both sites. A quick Google search shows at least &lt;a href="http://www.moveameri</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 11:40:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#3</link>
<description>We all have political opinions to express. &#160;Some of us do so online, other do so by camping out in front of the Bush ranch and having press conferences. &#160;Whether anything that any of us have to say is (as you so delicately put it) worth shit, is </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 11:26:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: Sheehan Done</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#2</link>
<description>If there was any justice this story would have run years ago.... talk about someone with absolutely nothing to contribute to anything -- and the notion that what you have to say is worth a shit just because you lost a child is revolting in the extreme.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 09:38:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: From the subq</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/5/30/64321/1679#1</link>
<description>&lt;i>The Sheehan story is a nice combination of pathos and bathos. It's too bad that she got her 15 minutes of fame due to the death of her son. And it's too bad that she got her 15 minutes of fame at all.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Yeah, plus she got part of her fame from crit</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 07:32:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>