<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540</link>
<description>On July 24th, &lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/23/news/economy/minimum_wage/index.htm?cnn=yes">minimum wage earners&lt;/a> in the United States get a mandated raise to $5.85 an hour. This applies only in the 18 states where local governments have not &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._state_minimum_wages">already raised the rate&lt;/a> above the previous $5.15hr.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:22:27 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:49:12 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Blowback</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#40</link>
<description>Yeah, I never really asked her about it much after the initial incident. Nobody likes to pry. But apparently the county's response was "Well, you have an MS, that is all the education you need. Drop out of school, get a job and pay off that $20k+ hospital </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:49:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#39</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>But that's neither here nor there to the point&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Really? What was your point, then?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:45:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Good eye</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#38</link>
<description>&lt;i>This entire sideshow is just an ongoing display of Democratic incompetence. What a quagmire!&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Yeah, and if the neocons know anything, it's quagmires.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:52:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Thank God for the Democratic Party</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#37</link>
<description>&lt;i>Let's see, just today we got Rove subpoenaed and Gonzalez painted further into the perjury corner.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Rove will make the same play that Miers and Bolten did, professing executive privilege, and we've seen where that leads: a dead end. The Justice De</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:26:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#36</link>
<description>Why not?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:50:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Thank God for the Democratic Party</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#35</link>
<description>&lt;i>Or held three months of hearings on the firing of a few attorneys.&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;Yeah, because those have gone &lt;i>so&lt;/i> poorly. Let's see, just today we got Rove subpoenaed and Gonzalez painted further into the perjury corner. Alberto is gonna get nailed o</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:48:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#34</link>
<description>But that's neither here nor there to the point.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:42:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#33</link>
<description>I assume you're referring to being sued by your legal employees and implying that illegal employees are less likely to sue but maybe I'm just being cynical. It's beneficial to the employee and hugely beneficial to many business owners who get away with it </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:40:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Blowback</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#32</link>
<description>I would assume your tried to go on some sort of medical assistance which probably ran into insurance issues and who the hell knows what kind of bureaucracy kicked in. I've had numerous (well educated) friends go on unemployment assistance a la George on Se</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:35:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Re: Thank God for the Democratic Party</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#31</link>
<description>&lt;i>Or tried to pass half-assed attempts to pull out of Iraq over and over.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Geez gerry, you make the Iraq clusterfuck sound so...sexy.&lt;br>&#10;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:42:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Blowback</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#30</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>If I recall correctly, some welfare benefits are tied to a comparison of your income versus a defined "poverty level" based on the lowest wage earners in society&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I am unaware of any welfare program administered by that criter</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:12:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Blowback</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#29</link>
<description>If I recall correctly, some welfare benefits are tied to a comparison of your income versus a defined "poverty level" based on the lowest wage earners in society. I believe that is what I was told by a co-worker who had a massive medical accident and attem</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:14:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#28</link>
<description>Who are you and what have you done with Gerrymander?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:49:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#27</link>
<description>For the record, I'm totally OK with this. Yeah, I get all the economic arguments about how a minimum wage increase won't actually help the poor and will cause some distortion in the market. It's just that I think those arguments miss the point.&lt;p>&#10;The bigg</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:32:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Thank God for the Democratic Party</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#26</link>
<description>Or held three months of hearings on the firing of a few attorneys. Or tried to pass half-assed attempts to pull out of Iraq over and over.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:06:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#25</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Name one sector that typically employs minimum wage workers and can't pass additional costs off to the consumer. Wal-Mart? McDonalds? Orange Juice?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Yes, all of those. We're talking about a basic economic principle, not a flaw</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:09:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#24</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I don't see how a minimum wage increase would effect the velocity of money&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>It's fairly easy to see that minimum wage workers are generally not in the investment class. That is to say that an extra penny added to the wages of </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:03:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#23</link>
<description>Something that for some reason gets little mention in minimum wage debates is that undocumented workers who make more than the minimum wage can still cost less to employers than a legal employee making minimum wage, and that's without including potential c</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:38:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#22</link>
<description>I don't see how a minimum wage increase would effect the velocity of money.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:30:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#21</link>
<description>Artificially raising wages won't result in raised standards of living. &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:25:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#20</link>
<description>&lt;i>They already know that. That's why they're paying minimum wage. If the workers were able to produce more they wouldn't be making minimum wage.&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;Way to skirt the issue.&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;&lt;i>There is a certain amount of elasticity to demand, and that means p</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:48:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#19</link>
<description>One question I always like to hear politicians answer is, "How much is a quart of milk?"</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:20:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#18</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...you can't get more work out of your workers at this point&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>They already know that. That's why they're paying minimum wage. If the workers were able to produce more they wouldn't be making minimum wage.&lt;br>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>..</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:51:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#17</link>
<description>While in general terms you're right, this gives little thought to where the job market is currently. Usually, if you have to lay someone off, other people have to pick up the slack. However, worker productivity remains near all time highs and unemployment </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:28:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#16</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>An increase in the price of unskilled labor no more increases inflation or the money supply than an increase in the relative price of any other good&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I beg your pardon. I misspoke. I should have said "money velocity" rather th</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:18:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#15</link>
<description>&lt;i>So if the minimum wage is part of an overall package of regulations that seek to bring Mississippi's standard of living in line with the rest of the country so their citizens are not overly dependent on Federal programs, then yes.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I've never seen</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:54:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#14</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Most of the poor in America make less than minimum wage as undocumented workers&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Those folks aren't included in the poverty statistics. (And with good reason.) Most of the poor either do not work at all, or work only itinerant</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:40:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Thank God for the Democratic Party</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#13</link>
<description>They shouldn't have spent so much time trying to bail out Bush on his loser immigration reform.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:28:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#12</link>
<description>On the one hand, yes, on the other hand, no. Does it make sense for California to have a minimum wage almost double that of many other states? Considering its standard of living, yes. But does it make sense for the Federal government to allow Mississippi t</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:26:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#11</link>
<description>It's true. Most of the poor in America make less than minimum wage as undocumented workers.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:23:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#10</link>
<description>An increase in the price of unskilled labor no more increases inflation or the money supply than an increase in the relative price of any other good. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:18:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#9</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...perhaps an economist could explain what effect raising the wage for all the unskilled would have on inflation, if any?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>As with most economic questions, the answer is, "it depends." On the one hand, all else being equal, ra</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:11:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#8</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Given that the poverty rate is 13%, that's a 15% decline in poverty &lt;b>if it were true that a raise to the minimum wage&lt;/b> even lifted them out of poverty&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Yeah, well, I was kidding above. Since only a small fraction of those</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:06:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Thank God for the Democratic Party</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#7</link>
<description>And with such speed! Here it is, only six months after the bill was introduced, and it's already been passed. At this rate, Congress might be able to pass another bill pledged from their "first 100 hours" campaign by Christmas.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:03:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rombuu: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#6</link>
<description>Disclaimer: &#160;I think having a minimum wage is stupid anyway.&lt;p>&#10;But if you are going to have one, having a national one that is the same everywhere and ignores the cost of living in different parts of the country is even stupider.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:23:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#5</link>
<description>Also, I forgot to mention in the writeup about the "&lt;a href="http://www.dol.gov/dol/topic/wages/subminimumwage.htm">Subminimum wage&lt;/a>" as Dvandom pointed out. It is an interesting little quirk in the law.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:36:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#4</link>
<description>Out of curiosity, perhaps an economist could explain what effect raising the wage for all the unskilled would have on inflation, if any?&lt;p>&#10;My guess is, not much. Only a few states will actually be affected by this so it will be much more symbolic than act</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:35:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#3</link>
<description>Given that the poverty rate is &lt;a href="http://www.nccbuscc.org/cchd/povertyusa/povfacts.shtml">13%&lt;/a>, that's a 15% decline in poverty if it were true that a raise to the minimum wage even lifted them out of poverty.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:33:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#2</link>
<description>Yep, just goes to show you how woefully out of touch with its people the Federal government is.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:24:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Minimum wage workers get 70¢ raise</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/24/83541/4540#1</link>
<description>Thank God for the Democratic Party. The 2% of adult workers now receiving the minimum wage will be lifted out of poverty due to the new increase. &lt;p>&#10;It's a new day in America!</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:36:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>