<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Are Teachers Going To See The Merit Of Merit Pay? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158</link>
<description>In the US, teaching careers are traditionally based on seniority and levels of education. &#160;Yet, this being the era of &lt;i>&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Child_Left_Behind">No Child Left Behind&lt;/a>&lt;/i> (NCLB), funding for the public schools teachers teach at are increasingly becoming linked to how well students perform on standardized tests. &#160;The idea that teachers' pay and promotions should be linked to student test performance is not warmly received by most teachers' unions. &#160;Howeve</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:03:55 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:33:23 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Are Teachers Going To See The Merit Of Merit P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#13</link>
<description>Are you saying most people with money aren't opposed other people getting money at the expense of those who already have money?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:33:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Are Teachers Going To See The Merit Of Merit P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#12</link>
<description>&lt;i>Private schools are occupied by the children of people who already care enough about their children's education so much that they'll pay extra for education. If you think this is somehow a disincentive to exceed NCLB standards -- even before they were e</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:42:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Are Teachers Going To See The Merit Of Merit P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#11</link>
<description>&lt;i>as I have mentioned before, the results are already rigged against public schools (unreasonable standards) and for private institutions(not needing to meet NCLB guidelines).&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Private schools are occupied by the children of people who already care </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:58:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Are Teachers Going To See The Merit Of Merit P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#10</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>The simple fact is, rich people don't want poor people to get educated and take their jobs&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>You must be a liberal. Do you know how I can tell? It's the combination of the deeply flawed logic, seemingly complete lack of knowled</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:01:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Partially Agree</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#9</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; Yes, as long as pay is connected to both course hours and experience, there will be that issue of pay imbalance.&lt;br>&#10;&#160; &#160; What I had in mind, though, and should have been more precise in posting originally, is to reduce the requireme</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:58:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Are Teachers Going To See The Merit Of Merit P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>Yes. This is one of the reasons I don't pay much attention to critics of NCLB. Standardized tests had been used for decades prior to No Child Left Behind as ways to chart performance.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Perhaps you should pay closer attention to them. &#160;Part of</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:28:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: It's Money That Matters</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#7</link>
<description>&lt;i>The best way to get good people into teaching, especially at the elementary level, would be to reduce the academic requirements&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;But this is a pay scale problem as well. Union teaching jobs link teacher education (among other things) with salary. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:05:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Are Teachers Going To See The Merit Of Merit P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#6</link>
<description>&lt;i>What about those teachers in the hell-hole urban school districts? [...] What talented teachers the urban areas have attracted will get out and go somewhere else, causing those districts to need to hire from unqualified or less qualified staff outside t</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:58:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Are Teachers Going To See The Merit Of Merit P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#5</link>
<description>&lt;i> It doesn't look good on paper.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Let me clarify: It looks good on paper to disinterested and uninformed parties who give it a quick glance on some candidate's glossy flyer of campaign bullet points. They then vote for the person because they are "</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:57:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: It's Money That Matters</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#4</link>
<description>Just what I want -- the same people teaching my kids that scan me at the airport. I do agree with your point to an extent, though. If, instead of doubling teachers salaries they took the extra made up theoretical fairy money that might be spent on educatio</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:42:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: It's Money That Matters</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#3</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; Actually, I'm really torn on this issue, despite the chance to use a Randy Newman song as a comment title. While more money makes any job more palatable, some of the worst teachers I've ever had were in it for monetary reasons: either to make</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:28:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Are Teachers Going To See The Merit Of Merit P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#2</link>
<description>It doesn't look good on paper. All this made up bureaucratic BS -- vouchers, no child left behind, merit pay, magnet schools, administrators cheating test scores -- they're nothing but a cover for the fact that there's no money in education. Why would I wa</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:37:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Are Teachers Going To See The Merit Of Merit P</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/20/104359/158#1</link>
<description>It looks like a good idea on paper. However, it has some major flaws:&lt;p>&#10;-What about those teachers in the hell-hole urban school districts? Who would you get to teach there if pay was linked to test performance and the children basically were uncontrollab</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:35:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>