<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Con Vick (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233</link>
<description>The sporting world and society as a whole was &lt;a href="http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/7/30/133949/028">shocked&lt;/a> several weeks ago by the &lt;a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0717072vick1.html">indictment&lt;/a> of NFL superstar quarterback Michael Vick for conspiracy and participating in the bloodsport of dogfighting. Now that there appears no doubt that Mr. Vick will &lt;a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2983121">plead guilty to the crimes and likely do prison t</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:04:45 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:25:54 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Since When Do We Copy Our Headlines</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#19</link>
<description>&lt;i>I agree, but I think comparing Don Imus to Vick and Bin Laden is kind of extreme.&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;It is extreme. But I'm not the one who did it. To mix pop culture metaphors, each, like Vick, has had his own fifteen minutes of hate and then been forgotten ent</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:25:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: What The Hell?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#18</link>
<description>I don't think Vick's problem was dog fight at all. I think I've said so elsewhere in this thread.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:08:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: What The Hell?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#17</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; Sorry, I've been thinking about this post for a couple days, and I still don't know quite what you're getting at. Imus I could chalk up to some kind of media frenzy, even though he knew damn well that advertising was the name of the game-- li</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:56:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: It's All Over But The Singing For Vick.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#16</link>
<description>No, if the reports are true and I were Arthur Blank, the lawyer who produced the contract that Vick signed wouldn't be working for the Falcons beyond yesterday.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:22:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: It's All Over But The Singing For Vick.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#15</link>
<description>So what you are saying is that if you were in the Falcon's HR department you'd be on the phone begging the commissioner to drop a lifetime ban on Vick ASAP to increase the money they'd get back once they drop him from the roster?</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:48:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: It's All Over But The Singing For Vick.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#14</link>
<description>Actually, the signing bonus is money paid up front when they sign the contract. &#160;However, the impact on the pay cap in the NFL is to prorate the signing bonus over the life of the contract. &#160;Thus the Falcons can't go after that portion of the sig</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:14:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: It's All Over But The Singing For Vick.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#13</link>
<description>&lt;i> When no other money in the NFL is guaranteed, that seems like money the teams shouldn't be able to recoup, no matter the circumstance. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Does the NFL have a players union pension system and healthcare plan for retirees the same way baseball does?</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:30:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: It's All Over But The Singing For Vick.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#12</link>
<description>I know it's part of the CBA but it seems wrong to me that teams can go after signing bonuses. They were bonuses for signing with the team. When no other money in the NFL is guaranteed, that seems like money the teams shouldn't be able to recoup, no matter </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:53:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Since When Do We Copy Our Headlines</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#11</link>
<description>&lt;i> We've reached a very sad point in our society when these weekly morality obsessions cause us to make stark declarations that are invariably rolled back during more level-headed times...Don Imus, Michael Vick, Osama Bin Laden. String him up! Ban him for</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:39:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Marbury is an idiot</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#10</link>
<description>&lt;i> Personally, I think they should allow gambling of all kinds in professional sports. &#160;Just open the whole thing up to market forces. &#160;A official or player should not be made into a pariah if he's cheating...they should be ostracized for not gi</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:28:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: It's All Over But The Singing For Vick.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#9</link>
<description>No sooner does he scribble his signature on a statement of facts basically saying he did everything he said he didn't. &#160;NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell didn't lose any time and Vick has &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/25/sports/football/25vick.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:15:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Oh, By The Way.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#8</link>
<description>Eh, nothing major. Just registering the most mild form of discontent as an aside. I'd prefer to be original myself and I thought it was a little derivative even when the daily news ran it in the first place. Still better than plastic's tho ;)</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:31:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: You're not really surprised by Upshaw?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#7</link>
<description>No, my "surprise" at Upshaw is entirely disingenuous. I await the Troy Vincent administration with bated breath. I didn't think it was possible to outdo the three stooges of Bettman, Stern and Selig but apparently they've found their Shemp.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:28:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Oh, By The Way.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#6</link>
<description>What's your problem with copying the headline? &#160;I don't believe it appears in any of the links and I suggested it in the queue and gave full disclosure about where it came from. &#160;I thought it was a fairly succinct, witty statement.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:44:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: You're not really surprised by Upshaw?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#5</link>
<description>I mean, when was the last time the man ever had a contrary opinion to what the commissioner had to say about anything? &#160;Little wonder why contracts in the NFL are among the most worthless documents known to man. &#160;Here, you earn a gazillion dollar</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:41:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Since When Do We Copy Our Headlines</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#4</link>
<description>A good point was made the other day that the labor union has seriously capitulated in its defense of one of its members in this case. We've reached a very sad point in our society when these weekly morality obsessions cause us to make stark declarations th</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:16:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Marbury is an idiot</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#3</link>
<description>Marbury can have whatever opinion he wants. It got a little play because it happened to fly in the face of the current media group think. Honestly, we need more people to just say things outside of the media group think whenever those rabid dogs reach such</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:10:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: Marbury is an idiot</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#2</link>
<description>I'll see your coff - Pete Rose - coff and raise you one coff - Tim Donaghy - coff. &#160;As a master of logic, Marbury is a damned fine basketball player. &#160;That's about all you can say about it.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:08:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Marbury is an idiot</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2007/8/23/153740/233#1</link>
<description>Has he forgotten that a big part of dog fighting is &lt;i>gambling&lt;/i>? &#160;I understand that pro-sports takes a dim view of this (coff-Pete Rose- coff)&lt;p>&#10;Personally, I think they should allow gambling of all kinds in professional sports. &#160;Just open t</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:56:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>