<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Oil... but I don't mean Petroleum (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494</link>
<description>Lately I've been spending lots of time in the kitchen, and have been experimenting with various &lt;a href="http://www.healthcastle.com/cooking-oils.shtml">cooking oils&lt;/a>. &#160;Here's what I've learned:
</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:23:24 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:27:51 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Cast iron pan question</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#25</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>My cast iron skillet (seasoned as per instructions) has an overall flat black coating inside the pan itself. &#160;Is that how it should look or did I screw up somewhere?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>If you screwed up you would either have a sticky pan o</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:27:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: No love for butter; margarine?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#24</link>
<description>I am not concerned with salt for any health reasons, since no one in my house has hypertension. &#160;I prefer the 'pure' flavor of unsalted butter, and when I cook, I prefer to add salt to taste. &#160;It's a matter of preference. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;Use it or not </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:22:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeeter1: Re: Cast iron pan question</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#23</link>
<description>No, you're doing just fine. &#160;My cast-iron skillets are 50+ years old and black as coal, but they work just fine. &#160;Once in a while they need to be re-seasoned with a bit of oil, and I only hand-wash those pans. &#160;I just have this feeling (perh</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:59:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Cast iron pan question</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#22</link>
<description>My cast iron skillet (seasoned as per instructions) has an overall flat black coating inside the pan itself. &#160;Is that how it should look or did I screw up somewhere?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:45:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Oil... but I don't mean Petroleum</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#21</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/19/business/worldbusiness/19palmoil.html?pagewanted=1&amp;ei=5087&amp;em&amp;en=ebc7e555b890bc3d&amp;ex=1201064400">Non-petroleum oil is still oil&lt;/a>.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:50:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Since we're talking cooking oil</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#20</link>
<description>I'm impressed. &#160;60 years without getting distracted and letting them burn up. &#160;Well, actually I have one nearly that old, but in general they don't tend to last quite that long. &#160;I tend to go for cast iron. &#160;If you forget it it smokes o</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:21:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeeter1: Re: Since we're talking cooking oil</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#19</link>
<description>&lt;i>"I finally ditched my "non-stick" pans that routinely chipped in exchange for some stainless steel cookware that I got for christmas."&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I have to agree. &#160;I'm still using some copper-bottom stainless-steel pans and pots, &lt;a href="http://www.re</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:51:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeeter1: Re: No love for butter; margarine?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#18</link>
<description>&lt;i>"Basically, take some unsalted butter (always use unsalted for cooking)"&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;You know, I've heard the same thing about unsalted butter about a bazillion times on the PBS cooking shows, but then they always go and add salt to the recipe. &#160;Maybe t</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:26:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeeter1: Re: Since we're talking cooking oil</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#17</link>
<description>&lt;i>"a decent break down of pans. I finally ditched my "non-stick" pans that routinely chipped in exchange for some stainless steel cookware that I got for christmas."&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Great point. &#160;I've got all of them. &#160;Cast iron, enameled cast iron, stai</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:02:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rEvolution inAction: Re: Oil... but I don't mean Petroleum</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#16</link>
<description>Health? all I care about is taste.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:29:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: No love for butter &amp;amp;amp; margarine?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#15</link>
<description>You can make your own clarified butter, which is excellent for all kinds of sautee tasks. &#160;Removing the solids makes all the difference. &#160;Melt butter to a nice runny liquid, and render off the solids as they rise to the top.&lt;p>&#10;You can also make </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:22:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: No love for butter &amp;amp;amp; margarine?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#14</link>
<description>&lt;i> Lard (particularly bacon fat) makes the best fried eggs and fried potatoes&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&#13;&#10;&lt;i>*shrug*&lt;/i> - I've had those done in lard, and I prefer them done in margarine, personally.  I tend to fry things on relatively low heat, though, which is probably at </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:18:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Crisco Consumption</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#13</link>
<description>A &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VABSoHYQr6k"> short video &lt;/a> on the institution that uses more Crisco than anyone else, and what they use it for.&lt;p>&#10;Bad language alert, and most definitely not for the easily offended.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:12:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Since we're talking cooking oil</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#12</link>
<description>Despite the nonsense that webpage leads with (restaurants cook on high? pfft - he needs to spend some time in a restaurant kitchen) , every kitchen should have at least one nonstick pan. There is no better way to cook eggs and a number of other foods. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:49:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Since we're talking cooking oil</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#11</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://tashian.com/carl/archives/2006/02/">Here's&lt;/a> a decent break down of pans. I finally ditched my "non-stick" pans that routinely chipped in exchange for some stainless steel cookware that I got for christmas.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:17:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeeter1: Re: No love for butter &amp;amp; margarine?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#10</link>
<description>&lt;i>"Health reasons aside, is there a reason why you would use oil or lard instead of butter/margarine when making those items?"&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Cooking properties and taste come to mind. &#160;Lard (particularly bacon fat) makes the best fried eggs and fried potato</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:53:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: even olive oil</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#9</link>
<description>You lose the health benefits of the oils once you cook them. At that point, it just becomes a matter of which is less bad for you.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:05:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: No love for butter &amp; margarine?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#8</link>
<description>I use extra virgin olive oil and standard vegetable oil for various oil frying needs and for basting things I'm going to grill, but for pan frying I generally go with butter or margarine, depending on the flavor I'm going for.  For eggs I usually go with m</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:05:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Oil... but I don't mean Petroleum</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#7</link>
<description>If you have to cook in oil, coconut's the healthiest. I no longer use oil to cook, although I do still drink some of the organic extra virgin with a lemon.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:14:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>doom4rent: Coconut Oil</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#6</link>
<description>90% saturated, ridiculously high smoking point... and useful as a skin moisturizer or, in a pinch, sexual lubricant.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:07:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>rEvolution inAction: Re: Oil... but I don't mean Petroleum</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#5</link>
<description>Extra-Virgin olive oil for everything. It's the only oil.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:25:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Oil... but I don't mean Petroleum</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#4</link>
<description>Grape seed oil has become rather popular recently. It supposedly has some of the same health benefits as olive oil, yet it has a fairly high smoke point, 420 degrees fahrenheit, which is just a little lower than peanut oil so it's good for frying. It taste</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:45:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: tossed salads and scrambled eggs</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#3</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://www.samswine.com/l39olivier-walnut-p-154526.html">Walnut oil&lt;/a>, on a bed of arugula, with crumbled blue cheese and croutons. Enough said.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:37:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeeter1: Re: Singing the praises of lard</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#2</link>
<description>Yes, I too have a small tub of rendered bacon fat that I keep in my freezer. &#160;Nothing beats it for frying eggs or hash-browns. &#160;Besides, you get to eat the bacon! &#160;Heck, there are even &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Everything-Tastes-Better-</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:07:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Singing the praises of lard</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/17/17739/6494#1</link>
<description>I have to say, lard is the king of all fats. &#160;I've never rendered a slab of hog fat, but I jealously guard my store of filtered bacon grease, which is close enough. &#160;I happen to live a pretty low carb lifestyle, and don't believe that saturated f</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:32:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>