<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Picking the Low-hanging Fruits of Our Nation (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845</link>
<description>Only 70.7% of the incoming &lt;a href="http://www.goarmy.com/flindex.jsp?#?channel=&amp;video=">Army&lt;/a> recruits held a regular high school diploma in 2007, down 20 points from the 90% benchmark. The lack of qualified recruits is causing &lt;a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/local/rodricks/blog/2008/01/end_class_warfare_restore_the.html">some&lt;/a> to call for a return to a general draft system.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:48:26 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:47:00 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Maybe They Should Pay Them A Decent Wage</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#52</link>
<description>I would consider military service more dangerous than fishing, but it's because of the higher chance of disability and not because of the chance of death, which is a bit lower. &#160;If we were in a situation with a casualty rate more typical of a war, we </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:47:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Maybe They Should Pay Them A Decent Wage</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#51</link>
<description>Actually, since it didn't have military figures at all, I was using it only for the civilian figures and taking military casualties and dividing them by the size of the force to compare.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:43:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Maybe They Should Pay Them A Decent Wage</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#50</link>
<description>That's an excellent point. I think the armed forces must also realize then that the people recruited by those ads are going to need all the character building and life lessons that are offered at such physical cost.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:51:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Striking fear into the hearts of our enemies</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#49</link>
<description>There is an upside to the low hanging fruit idea. &#160;Imagine the mass surrender* by an enemy that is faced by a battalion of Lyndie Englunds.&lt;p>&#10;*Of course, there would also probably be mass slaughter after the surrender...but hey, this is war and war i</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:06:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: the draft</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#48</link>
<description>&lt;i>the military recruitment offices would be flooded with patriotic citizens wishing to defend their country.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;As they were after 9/11. &#160;Pity that those brave young men and women found themselves in a country other than the one responsible for t</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:02:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: the draft</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#47</link>
<description>I have a fundamental philosophical problem with the draft, which is that it is a form of involuntary servitude, also known as slavery, which is unconstitutional in the US as well as being highly immoral and unacceptable.&lt;p>&#10;I also believe that if the US is</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:29:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Maybe They Should Pay Them A Decent Wage</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#46</link>
<description>The chart you reference is derived from labor statistics from 2000. I assume the risks facing a soldier in peacetime are exponentially lower than those faced by the armed forces abroad right now.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:15:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: &quot;Doctor draft&quot;:  First...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#45</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>cuz doctors hardly ever catch teh gay&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>If you say so, Jimmy, but my conclusion came from the fact that for every doctor there are dozens of other medical specialists in the Army.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:33:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Maybe They Should Pay Them A Decent Wage</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#44</link>
<description>So what other jobs come with free room and board nowadays? &#160; What other jobs can you get so easily that pay so well? &#160;So long as you're young and single and don't need another house, the pay is really isn't that bad unless you're comparing it to </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:20:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Dvandom: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#43</link>
<description>Giant monster robots are either mechanized infantry (if they can't fly) or air cavalry (if they can). &#160;Either way, Army. &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:27:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: &quot;Doctor draft&quot;:  First...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#42</link>
<description>&lt;i>I doubt there were more than a couple.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;cuz doctors hardly ever catch teh gay.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:23:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#41</link>
<description>Made me laugh!</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:17:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Maybe They Should Pay Them A Decent Wage</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#40</link>
<description>What's interesting is that the Army realizes it can't pay troops a competitive wage (and has since the 1970s).  That's why military recruiting ads aren't like traditional recruiting ads for business positions.  Instead of talking about salary or benefits, </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:54:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Remember: Giant. Monster. Robots.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#39</link>
<description>I always thought "Zoltar" had a nice ring to it.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:22:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: In that case, are you changing your user name?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#38</link>
<description>&lt;i>&lt;blockquote>&lt;b>You know who should go off to war? &#160;The same folks that voted a war-mongering president into power.&lt;/b>&lt;p>&#10;Speaking as a person who voted for Bush twice, I'd be totally OK with that -- on one condition: we get to fight the way we wan</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:02:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: End Strength</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#37</link>
<description>I've been seeing claims that this is the longest war without a draft since the Revolutionary War, but of course it is more of a police action than a real war, and casualties are relatively low. &#160;This, combined with the 15 month on 12 month off rotatio</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:32:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#36</link>
<description>&lt;i>You know who should go off to war? &#160;The same folks that voted a war-mongering president into power.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Speaking as a person who voted for Bush twice, I'd be totally OK with that -- on one condition: we get to fight the way we want. None of this</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:52:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: &quot;Doctor draft&quot;:  First...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#35</link>
<description>I don't think there is any need to have a "doctor draft" even if all 50 of the 2005 discharges of medical personnel were physicians. But I doubt there were more than a couple.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:37:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: &quot;Doctor draft&quot;:  First...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#34</link>
<description>Linking gay discharges to the "doctor draft" idea would seem to indicate that there is a severe shortage of doctors because so many gay ones are being kicked out. I was just wondering how many of the 50 or so medical personnel given homo-discharges in 2005</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:35:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: &quot;Doctor draft&quot;:  First...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#33</link>
<description>What's the number that will get you to agree with me?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:29:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: &quot;Doctor draft&quot;:  First...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#32</link>
<description>And this matters why? &#160;It seems that the military can't afford to kick out anyone...much less those with critical skills just because they're teh gay.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:27:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: even for the Canadians.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#31</link>
<description>Yes, non-US citizen, documented permanent residents. I'm talking about Mexican-Mexicans and extending citizenship benefits to their families in exchange for service and/or making people citizens as soon as they sign up if they want, instead of simply reduc</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:22:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: &quot;Doctor draft&quot;:  First...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#30</link>
<description>How many of those 334 were doctors?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:01:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: &quot;Doctor draft&quot;:  First...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#29</link>
<description>Before beginning a "doctor draft," consider re-enlisting the &lt;a href="http://www.sldn.org/templates/press/record.html?record=3613">334 doctors, nurses and mental health specialists&lt;/a> who were discharged from military service because of their sexual orien</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:40:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#28</link>
<description>Maybe I can get leave from my post in Afghanistan long enough to get over to Iraq and ask all those Bush voters, "What the &lt;i>fuck&lt;/i> were you thinking?"</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:23:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#27</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Your idea is to send an avowed anti-war person to a war zone&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Only because your nation is at war and by being Canadian you are, to some extent, responsible for that.&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>My idea was to send those most wanting war to </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:13:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#26</link>
<description>&lt;i>What's so different about my idea that you should be compelled to join the Canadian Army and "go off to war" in Afghanistan?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Only the gist, z.&lt;br>&#10;Your idea is to send an avowed anti-war person to a war zone. &#160;My idea was to send those most </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:01:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: even for the Canadians.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#25</link>
<description>I knew that, but I think thefadd is proposing allowing illegal immigrants to enlist, or maybe just opening up some American Foreign Legion recruiting centers south of the border.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:38:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#24</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Now you're proposing that today we're going to Hong Kong, but first we're going to the zoo&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>No, you misunderstood what I wrote. I said that &lt;i>you&lt;/i> should go to Afghanistan and serve in the Canadian Army. &lt;i>I'm&lt;/i> not goi</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:37:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: even for the Canadians.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#23</link>
<description>You guys realize that &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/1005634">non-US-citizens are allowed to enlist&lt;/a> in the US military...right?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:32:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#22</link>
<description>Let's see. &lt;i>I&lt;/i> proposed that those who most scream for war should be the ones to wage it. &#160;Somehow, that idea got under your skin, but not nearly as much as the fact that I'm not even American, and how dare I have an opinion on who should serve i</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:22:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#21</link>
<description>Fine. I think you, I mean &lt;i>you,&lt;/i> personally, should be in Afghanistan right now, serving in the Canadian Army.&lt;p>&#10;Does that idea make any sense whatsoever?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:00:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: even for the Canadians.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#20</link>
<description>There's no need to start a draft, so the Mexican idea isn't worth discussing.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:58:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#19</link>
<description>Oh come on, z, that's horseshit and you know it. &#160;This is a discussion board, fer chrissakes, and we all throw out opinions about all sorts of things. &#160;By your above logic your opinion about &lt;i>anything&lt;/i> not American should be ignored. &#160;I</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:46:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: even for the Canadians.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#18</link>
<description>I think we should let the Mexicans in before starting a draft and I don't see where that wouldn't be a win-win.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:38:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#17</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...absolutely deaf to anyone living in the free world who doesn't carry your water&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Not at all. I just don't think any American should pay attention to a Canadian's opinion about whom should serve in the US armed forces. I wou</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:16:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: what a prankster</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#16</link>
<description>that's a good one.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:56:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#15</link>
<description>Er, yes. Why not?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:55:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#14</link>
<description>How utterly American. &#160;Self-proclaimed "leaders of the free world", but absolutely deaf to anyone living in the free world who doesn't carry your water.&lt;p>&#10;Thanks for the reminder.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:32:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#13</link>
<description>Ah, gotcha. Well, I guess we'd better disregard anything you have to say about who should fight for the US.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:20:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#12</link>
<description>No. &#160;Did you ever vote for Jean Chretien?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:16:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#11</link>
<description>Did you ever vote for Bill Clinton?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:12:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#10</link>
<description>Why not? &#160;After all, the Iraqis are going to welcome Americans as liberators! &#160;It'll all be over before the you know it! &#160;Two weeks - tops! &#160;And it'll only cost a buck ninety-nine!</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:07:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#9</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>You know who should go off to war? &#160;The same folks that voted a war-mongering president into power&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Even the women?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:57:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#8</link>
<description>You know who should go off to war? &#160;The same folks that voted a war-mongering president into power. &#160;I'm guessing Bush doesn't get re-elected in '04, what with his "base" off doing his busy work.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:55:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#7</link>
<description>&lt;i>To get an army that's more representative of the nation, you need a war that people are actually willing to fight.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Of course, that hurdle is so much easier to clear when the media is functioning as the propaganda arm of the US instead of the US' </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:21:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Dvandom: A draft isn't enough to remove classist bias</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#6</link>
<description>Consider the last time we had an active draft, in Vietnam. &#160;Anyone with money and social standing could find legal ways to avoid being drafted, and could afford the less legal means if it became necessary. &#160;As a result, the conscripted army was p</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:10:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MC Nally: Re: Picking the Low-hanging Fruits of Our Nation</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#5</link>
<description>Low hanging, yes, but they object to "fruits."</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:21:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Territan: Support Our Savings-- er, Troops!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#4</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;b>thefadd&lt;/b>: Maybe They Should Pay Them A Decent Wage ... For, you know, putting their lives on the line and such. Perhaps they could even do it consistently.&lt;/blockquote>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>Are you sure about that? I mean, that sounds an awfully lot like </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:26:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Maybe They Should Pay Them A Decent Wage</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#3</link>
<description>For, you know, putting their lives on the line and such. Perhaps they could even do it consistently.&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;Anyone who honestly believes that a draft ought to be put in place because it will discourage warfare is welcome to join me at the poker table at any</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:38:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Hypothetical</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#2</link>
<description>Lets say for a moment the current system of asking doctors and nurses to sign up for the military, guard or reserve after their residencies or education in exchange for loan repayment, or &lt;a href="http://academic.uofs.edu/organization/premed/army.htm">acce</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:28:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Picking the Low-hanging Fruits of Our Nation</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/24/144723/845#1</link>
<description>I am reading the second installment of &lt;a href="http://www.liberationtrilogy.com/">The Liberation Trilogy&lt;/a>. &#160;One constantly reads about draftees and volunteers in the U.S. forces who were classmates at Ivies and other great colleges, professionals </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:16:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>