<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Mum's The Word On Mum And Dad In British Classrooms (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930</link>
<description>Anti-gay bullying has been more than a bit of a problem in British schools.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:07:32 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:33:06 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>thefadd: this joke is gay but</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#16</link>
<description>Then there's:&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;"Jew eat?"&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;"No, jew?"</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:33:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>shane: Re: queer</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#15</link>
<description>That's interesting - my friends are all recently graduated from liberal arts colleges and know what all those post-modernist words actually mean. And they are activists too. &#160;So I could see the difference there... &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:15:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: queer</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#14</link>
<description>In my experience "queer" carries with it significant baggage that most modern gay professionals don't want to touch. &#160;It is used only by politically active (and liberal) gay people, generally those who have been in college or grad school within the la</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:42:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: gyp</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#13</link>
<description>Why do you hate gypsies?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:11:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>shane: Re: queer</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#12</link>
<description>The wikipedia introduction to queer is rather informative... &lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>The word &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer">queer&lt;/a> has traditionally meant "strange" or "unusual," but its use in reference to LGBT (gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, inter</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:38:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Degee: Re: jew</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#11</link>
<description>Where I'm from we said "gyp". &lt;a href="http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-gyp1.htm">http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-gyp1.htm&lt;/a></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:22:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: jew</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#10</link>
<description>And I've heard it used as a verb also (and not necessarily in the Deep South) to express the fact that someone got cheated in a deal. &#160;"He got jewed out of $10 on the processing fee."</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:32:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: jew</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#9</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I actually have a dictionary which states that "Jew" is considered derogatory&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I have heard "jew" used as a verb, though only in the south (even by educated people in Atlanta). It means "to negotiate a price in a shrewd manner</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:29:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: gay</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>"What the Brits seem concerned about is the use of "gay" as a derogatory adjective, as in, 'that shirt is so gay.'"&lt;/i> &#160;While that's an actionable use of the word, the news article seems to say the Brits are banning the use of the word altogether </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:28:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: queer</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#7</link>
<description>I know that many people prefer the term queer, and as I previously mentioned I have dropped my objection to it, but nonetheless, if homosexuals would like to gain acceptance as a normal part of the human race, it seems odd to deliberately take on a name me</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Feb 2008 09:30:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: gay</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#6</link>
<description>I know that there are those who try to treat "gay" as if it were a derogatory term, but then, the same thing has been done with "Jewish" by those who hate Jews. &#160;Nazis used to complain about such things as "Jewish science". &#160;(I actually have a di</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Feb 2008 09:22:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Re: homophobia</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#5</link>
<description>When I was a kid in school, we used to taunt those who didn't fit in by calling them "threats to traditional family values."</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:34:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>shane: Re: queer</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#4</link>
<description>&lt;i>I have tended to dislike the alternative term "queer" &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Around here queer is he preferred term - it is what my queer friends call themselves.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:53:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: gay</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#3</link>
<description>I know people who object to "gay" being used as a noun -- as in, "Lots of gays live in San Francisco" -- preferring that it instead be an adjective, as in "Lots of gay people live in San Francisco." &#160;This usage emphasizes that it's just one characteri</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:15:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Magic Bullets and Zero Tolerance</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#2</link>
<description>Virtually every meeting I attend which involves a marketing/non-security person discussing corporate risk strategy, there is always at least one person who insists on reviewing a solution based on 'a solving the problem entirely standard' by spending garga</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:16:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: homophobia</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/30/15120/9930#1</link>
<description>The one aspect of the new anti-homophobic guidelines that bothers me is the suppression of the term "gay" which is not &#160;a derogatory term, and which is a term that I think we genuinely need, since the only other non-derogatory term we could use would </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:47:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>