<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062</link>
<description>US blacks receive &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0430653420080107">inferior cancer treatment&lt;/a> compared to whites. Disparities in treatment first documented in 1992 have continued despite all efforts to erase them. Researchers studied treatments for cancer given to more than &lt;a href="http://health.usnews.com/usnews/health/healthday/080107/no-change-in-cancer-care-race-gap-since-1990s.htm">143,000 Americans over age 65&lt;/a> from 1992 to 2002 under Medicare, and their findings were</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:16:19 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:41:38 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#41</link>
<description>Fascinating final question ("As the people in the linked studies had similar health care benefits, how do you explain the differences in treatment?"). Rather than respond directly, I will quote "Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cance</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:41:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#40</link>
<description>Are you aware that a large percentage of men over the age of 80 who died of some cause other than prostate cancer, have prostate cancer? &#160;Prostate cancer is one of the least aggressive cancers. &#160;If you get it later in life, it's not likely you ar</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:37:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#39</link>
<description>Fallacious? He has no personal experience with American race relations. Growing up in Minsk I doubt it was in the papers much, either.&lt;p>&#10;"How much do you, a white American male born in the 20th century, know about the "plight of the American Negro"?&lt;p>&#10;Po</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:40:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#38</link>
<description>"You were born in Belarus and live in Canada, I don't think you know anything about the plight of the American Negro."&lt;p>&#10;Dangit...I tried looking up the class of fallacious argument to which your comment belongs but I didn't have any luck. &#160;Can you h</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:34:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#37</link>
<description>True enough. We treat people equally up north (except for First Nations, who claim huge tracts of land that we still want to steal from them). All I had to go on was your media and old Soviet propaganda. If I had any doubts, though, you have confirmed that</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:50:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#36</link>
<description>"Specific types of cancer that are very treatable using surgery," like prostate cancer, one of those forms that were part of this study?&lt;p>&#10;Do you claim that this study was "fudged" and that study in 1992 was "fudged"? Do you have any evidence to prove tha</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:45:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#35</link>
<description>As far as I am aware, I've made no specific claims about this particular research.&lt;p>&#10;As for cancer treatment. &#160;I am not aware of any scientific evidence that would lead me to believe that people who are treated for cancer live any longer than those w</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:11:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#34</link>
<description>That response was a bit unhinged, don't you think? &lt;p>&#10;You were born in Belarus and live in Canada, I don't think you know anything about the plight of the American Negro.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:19:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#33</link>
<description>Pretend you didn't read quote in story. Pretend whatever you like. Sell your poison package to your friends at Stormfront because I don't buy it. But why deny it anyway? If white people have more power and hate black people like you do, why not just fly th</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:23:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#32</link>
<description>"That was precisely what cancer doctors concluded based on study"&lt;p>&#10;Where did they conclude blacks were being denied care because they were black? That's not what the article you linked to said. The study discovered "racial disparities in cancer care", wh</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:17:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#31</link>
<description>That was precisely what cancer doctors concluded based on study. But who can be sure of anything? Maybe &lt;a href="http://www.consortiumnews.com/2007/092507.html">Up is &lt;b>Down&lt;/b>&lt;/a>. Maybe sky could seem green if you want to believe it badly enough. Based</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:38:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#30</link>
<description>"Let's pretend for one moment that joshv and you were absolutely correct"&lt;p>&#10;It should be obvious we are.&lt;p>&#10;"blacks who get denied these options because they were black "&lt;p>&#10;Are people being denied because they are black? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:25:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#29</link>
<description>Sentence that read "You don't believe there might be any correlation between getting best care available and getting inferior care?" should have read "You don't believe there might be any correlation between getting best care available and surviving your b</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:21:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#28</link>
<description>What part of &lt;blockquote>"Whites were 19% more likely than blacks to receive surgical removal of lung cancer tumors, 27% more likely to get chemotherapy after surgery for rectal cancer, 24% more likely to get chemotherapy for colon cancer, 7% more likely t</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:17:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#27</link>
<description>Let's pretend for one moment that joshv and you were absolutely correct in claiming that survival rate should be considered utterly meaningless statistic. Key portion of story says &lt;blockquote>"Whites were 19% more likely than blacks to receive surgical re</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:11:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#26</link>
<description>You seem to enjoy putting words in my mouth. &#160;I am saying that IF you want to do a proper comparison, the only difference between your cohorts should be race. &#160;If these studies have other variables which are not controlled for, then there &lt;strong</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:40:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#25</link>
<description>"People who can get diagnosed earlier do so because everyone knows early diagnosis increases your chances of survival"&lt;p>&#10;No, you misundertand what Josh said. &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/22/opinion/22welch.html?_r=1&amp;ex=1148875200&amp;en=c42</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:36:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#24</link>
<description>So you argue that by time Medicare kicks in, lower socio-economic status would lower life expectancy even if health care was identical thereafter? So major disparities in treatment between blacks and whites proved by these studies gets explained in your bo</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:22:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#23</link>
<description>I was talking about 5 year survival rates. &#160;They are next to useless as a statistical measure of much of anything other than improved diagnostic capabilities and earlier diagnosis. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;There may be other problems with the statistics quoted in th</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:16:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>3fingerspointback: I blame the difference in hospital quality</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#22</link>
<description>Even the US hospitals I've seen that are considered prestigious are stressful to work with, simply because the corporate environment is dysfunctional. &#160;Communication across departments is strained or misunderstood, and a team of individually skilled p</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:04:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: In other words</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#21</link>
<description>No. I realize I bear the burden of my past racially antagonistic comments, but I'm being serious when I think it's a real factor. There was an article recently in either the WSJ or the NYTimes about making sure you have an advocate, one of the examples was</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:00:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#20</link>
<description>So black people should be blamed for receiving inferior medical care on grounds that they might be more reluctant to visit doctors, as if this evidence-free speculation stands proved as true? Does lower overall life expectancy mean anything? (No, they coul</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:20:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#19</link>
<description>Doctor in story says black people get treated differently than white people, that "blacks get poorer health care because they're black" even when government pays equally for black and white health care (as in case of Medicare). You say "only color that rea</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:13:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#18</link>
<description>This study only included people on Medicare. All Medicare treatment gets paid for in same way and to same extent.&lt;p>&#10;If you mean to claim that unequal medical care prior to age 65 caused different outcomes after age 65, that works for me, but that doesn't </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:01:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: In other words</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#17</link>
<description>Unmarried black ho's ain't got a chance unless they got a strong player to do the heavy lifting for them. &#160;Right?&lt;p>&#10;You know what's funny though? &#160;I just JUST got of the phone with a friend of mine who is a white cancer survivor who's husband di</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:06:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#16</link>
<description>&lt;i>Actually there are recent studies that indicate that carbohydrate intake &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Does liquor had a lot of carbs? &#160;Not beer...but things like scotch et al?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:02:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Breast Cancer In China</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#15</link>
<description>Thanks dude, I'm glad I have, too. You don't know who I've known with cancer so you're concern is a little hollow but--to borrow your word--touching nonetheless. Vegetarianism is a far cry from veganism but for the record, I'm not a proponent of either. I </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:16:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Breast Cancer In China</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#14</link>
<description>According to &lt;a href="http://www.imaginis.com/breasthealth/statistics.asp">this information&lt;/a>, the incidence of breast cancer in China is 18.7 per 100,000. &#160;The death rate from breast cancer is 5.5 per 100,000. &#160;Thus I guess the incidence of ot</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:53:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#13</link>
<description>China Daily reports that &lt;a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-04/16/content_434747.htm">300 of every 100k&lt;/a> residents of Shanghai report cancer but it doesn't say if any of them have died.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:21:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#12</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Do you know any vegans who have died of cancer?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I don't know any vegans. Do you know if any Chinese person has died of cancer?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:10:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#11</link>
<description>Eh, that's how anybody who I know that kicked cancer did it.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:42:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#10</link>
<description>Do you know any vegans who have died of cancer?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:36:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#9</link>
<description>Assuming the study is rigorous, how do you know that diet doesn't work only for people of Chinese descent?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:42:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: other factors</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#8</link>
<description>Did they correlate for marriage? Blacks are more likely to be unmarried. Think of the difference between a single woman diagnosed with cancer navigating the health care system on her own and a married woman diagnosed with cancer who has her husband to act </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:22:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#7</link>
<description>Actually there are recent studies that indicate that carbohydrate intake is linked to cancer, there are some very promising animal models that actually saw tumor regression on a low/no carb diet, and researchers are starting to explore ketogenic diets as a</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:21:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#6</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>The China Study demonstrated pretty conclusively...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Conclusively? A book that's been charitably described as "a tower of vegan propaganda"?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:16:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#5</link>
<description>Well, if you wanna talk facts, the fact of the matter is that cancer comes and goes in everyone's system. The China Study demonstrated pretty conclusively that cancer is a dietary issue that stems from &lt;a href="http://www.thechinastudy.com/about.html">too </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:53:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#4</link>
<description>Well, my point was that even if you have two groups of people with access to the same level of healthcare, the mere reluctance of one group to visit the doctor could results in lower 5 year survival rates, even if both groups have roughly the same life exp</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:29:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#3</link>
<description>&lt;i>That being said, the conclusions do jive with my anecdotal understanding of cancer treatment in the US.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Although oddly humorous here, &#160;you should go with "jibe."</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:23:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Dvandom: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#2</link>
<description>Joshv's subq comment is also telling. &#160;He points out that five-year survival rates are highly dependent on when you get diagnosed. &#160;Even if every diagnosed cancer patient gets the same quality of treatment, someone without insurance is less likel</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:26:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Racial Disparities In US Cancer Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/1/7/14389/58062#1</link>
<description>Given that I don't support the use of cancer-causing chemotherapy as part of a cancer treatment regimen, paragraph two hardly concerns me. As for the final paragraph, a study regarding the treatment of breast cancer in men hardly seems like the study I'd p</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:35:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>