<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>The Question: McCain (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68</link>
<description>The gaffes, the wardrobes, the policies and the pronouncements. They've all been probed. But what would the first 100 days of a John McCain Presidency really look like? GW Bush floundered directionlessly and failed in his policy attempts. Bill Clinton played hardball and shut down the government to get his way.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:52:44 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:27:15 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Wrong</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#58</link>
<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://data3.blog.de/media/593/2398593_f669923d52_m.jpeg">bettor&lt;/a>?&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/03/07/international/07military.large1.jpg">betted&lt;/a>?&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http:/</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:27:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: The Question: Tagamaniacs</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#57</link>
<description>Chill, please, the decaf is over in the corner. &#160;I was just addressing your question "... is there anything at all in the picture that identifies it as Canadian?" &#160;My point is that there is, if you look at the picture closely enough. &#160;It was</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Nov 2008 05:57:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: The Question: Tagamaniacs</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#56</link>
<description>Jesus, Bob. I didn't even look at the license plate. I saw a Crown Vic and "police" in English...which is (I'm just guessing here) about all anyone else saw.&lt;p>&#10;I'm sure if thefadd thinks that Canadian cities will burn if McCain pulls of an upset he'll chi</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Nov 2008 23:23:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Wrong</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#55</link>
<description>I didn't look at the link...just cut and pasted. &#160;I wasn't until after I saw the &lt;i>Quebec&lt;/i> license plate that I thought, wft and looked at the link. &#160;That's where the confusion set in. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>What difference does it make?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Indeed.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Nov 2008 22:05:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: The Question: Tagamaniacs</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#54</link>
<description>There is that Quebec license plate on the cruiser and "GO HABS GO" scrawled across the back bumper. &#160;Other than that, there's nothing in the picture which might give you a clue that you're looking at the aftermath of a Canadian riot.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Nov 2008 20:59:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: The Question: Tagamaniacs</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#53</link>
<description>Dude..seriously... is there anything at all in the picture that identifies it as Canadian? The car is a standard Crown Vic cruiser and the wording on the shields is in English. My point (obviously) is that if you hadn't seen the url, you wouldn't have had </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Nov 2008 20:44:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: The Question: Tagamaniacs</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#52</link>
<description>Seriously...why a picture of a Canadian police car? &#160;If the idea is that there will be widespread riots after Obama loses, a wrecked Canadian police car makes no sense. &#160;Is it that hard to find a picture of a riot wrecked &lt;i>American&lt;/i> police c</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Nov 2008 20:09:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: The Question: Obamamaniacs</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#51</link>
<description>Dammit, it seems we &lt;i>do&lt;/i> need a "disingenuous" tag after all. ;)</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Nov 2008 19:39:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: The Question: Obamamaniacs</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#50</link>
<description>What does a trashed police car in Quebec have to do with anything? &#160;Will Canada riot if Obama loses?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:31:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: The Question: Obamamaniacs</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#49</link>
<description>http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/464095.bin?size=404x272</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 21:10:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#48</link>
<description>There is competition in medicine. For one, look at "urgent care centers." They charge less than ERs and get people in and out quicker by taking private pay patients. There are also providers competing over other types of the experience, such as practices t</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 20:22:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: My apologies</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#47</link>
<description>Actually, I shouldn't be so critical...in the past you would have suggested to just let the bad apples die. &#160;Yer getting soft, Shumway.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:50:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#46</link>
<description>It was a lousy analog to begin with, but the comparison would be that &lt;i>causing&lt;/i> accidents gets you into the assigned risk pool, not being victim of an accident. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:46:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: How do you like them apples?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#45</link>
<description>&lt;i>The bad apples is an area where the government could help out.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Absolutely...especially those dumb fucks that let themselves get cancer.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:43:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: The Question: Obamamaniacs</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#44</link>
<description>While I wouldn't &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ladbrokes.com/lbr_sports?action=go_type&amp;category=SPECIALS&amp;">bet on McCain&lt;/a>, &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20081101.MCCAIN01/TPStory/International">the</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:26:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: No, it's all about the bad apples.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#43</link>
<description>Insurers shouldn't be forced to accept everyone who applies. The bad apples is an area where the government could help out.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:14:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#42</link>
<description>&lt;i>thank the Lord almighty that Medicare and Medicaid have been around since the inception of this great union. Without them no indigent person would ever have been able to get their medical needs met.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Yes, indeedy, charity was such an effective met</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 15:54:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#41</link>
<description>We were talking about health insurance, in case you forgot. &#160;I guess if you don't want to be in an assigned risk pool, you should stay healthy.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 15:51:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#40</link>
<description>&lt;i>Without them no indigent person would ever have been able to get their medical needs met.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Nor would children of the poor, working poor, and my widowed mother who had to stop working due to the cancer that eventually killed her, thank you very muc</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:18:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#39</link>
<description>Oh, and I should add that there are doctors who serve other communities who compete on price - or at least when they provide a service to a customer without insurance they don't charge the unconscionable prices that they feel comfortable doing when the cus</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:14:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#38</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Right now I'd challenge you to find a doctor or a hospital out there that competes on price&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>You're not an immigrant.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:12:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#37</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>The point is, when it comes to health insurance if you're forced to take an assigned risk policy odds are good it won't be your fault&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Um, yeah. That's why I said yours was not a good analogy.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:02:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#36</link>
<description>&lt;i>Where do I support getting rid of private insurance? &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Well, if you're not going to do away with private insurance, then how is any of the rest of your plan going to work? &#160;The market in healthcare right now is fundamentally out of whack beca</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:56:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#35</link>
<description>Where do I support getting rid of private insurance? &lt;p>&#10;All I have to say to your idea that relying on charity care is unrealistic is to thank the Lord almighty that Medicare and Medicaid have been around since the inception of this great union. Without t</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:39:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#34</link>
<description>&lt;i>Furthermore, it is difficult to get coverage as a high risk person, but not impossible. I've known folks with DUI convictions or some other type of motoring shenanigans in their background who had to go the SR-22 route, but could still find coverage. Th</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:35:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#33</link>
<description>&lt;i>The point is that if you're forced to take a assigned risk policy it's your own fault. If you don't want the extra expense, don't drive like an asshole.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;The point is, when it comes to health insurance if you're forced to take an assigned risk pol</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:32:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#32</link>
<description>I take issue with your analogy. &lt;p>&#10;On some level, it's usually due to a conscious action that people get tickets or get into an accident (for most folks, I am a horrible example since both tickets I ever got were bullshit and tossed out in court). If you </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:28:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#31</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Yeah, it's way beyond expensive, too. &#160;Back when I ran afoul of it, 20-some years ago, it cost $2K/year for basic no-fault&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>The point is that if you're forced to take a assigned risk policy it's your own fault. If you don</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 08:25:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: No, it's all about the bad apples.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#30</link>
<description>The trick is, if you accept anyone who applies, you get stuck with only people with health problems. &#160;The US standard is that the insurer agrees with the employer to insure only the employees, and to give them a good rate. &#160;Since the employees ha</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 03:44:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#29</link>
<description>&lt;i>some states have so-called "assigned risk" auto insurance that cannot turn you down.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Yeah, it's way beyond expensive, too. &#160;Back when I ran afoul of it, 20-some years ago, it cost $2K/year for basic no-fault. &#160;Lord knows what it costs n</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 03:38:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#28</link>
<description>Homeowner's insurance works the same way. &#160;See what happens to your premiums if a tree falls on your house or you make a claim for a burglary.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2008 03:33:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#27</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>So you're saying that we need to pass a law requiring medical insurance agencies to accept anyone for coverage that applies?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Why not?&lt;p>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...it's not something that I've ever heard a conservative propose&lt;/i>&lt;/bl</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:07:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#26</link>
<description>&lt;i>I dunno about where you live, but some states have so-called "assigned risk" auto insurance that cannot turn you down.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;So you're saying that we need to pass a law requiring medical insurance agencies to accept anyone for coverage that applies? &amp;n</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:03:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#25</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>In today's auto insurance industry, if you run up a couple of tickets and cause an accident you essentially become uninsurable (unless you've got megabucks to pay the insane premium you'll be hit with). &#160;Do you really want to move to th</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#24</link>
<description>&lt;i>Because it's such a nightmare arranging for my car and home insurance. &#160;Perhaps my employer should take that up as well. &#160; The reason it's a pain today is because it's rare. &#160;If everybody bought individual health care insurance there'd be</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:42:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#23</link>
<description>"Perhaps nobody with a clean health history would want their employer to do it (I'm not convinced of that but I'll agree to it for the sake of argument..) but for a pretty significant number of people the process of finding individual health coverage range</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:34:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MC Nally: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#22</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>If there wasn't the tax difference for employers purchasing the benefits no one would want his employer to do it.&lt;/blockquote>&lt;i>Perhaps&lt;/i> nobody with a clean health history would want their employer to do it (I'm not convinced of that but I'</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:20:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: Bill Clinton shut down the government?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#21</link>
<description>Then, your understanding of history is that "Congress failed to pass a budget bill?" &#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=980DE6D81539F937A25752C1A963958260&amp;scp=18&amp;st=nyt">Are you sure?&lt;/a></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:34:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Where did McCain get his campaign manager?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#20</link>
<description>&lt;i>the job the press has (by turns) neglected and covered up&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Ah, yes, the stab in the back. &#160;The final resort of the party of personal responsibility.&lt;p>&#10;The temerity of the lap-dog press, turning on their masters like that, all for an upstart </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:39:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: memo: don't type before coffee</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#19</link>
<description>I thought you meant they were both already under the bus, and she wasn't about what she was going to do to get out of there.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:31:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: The Question: McCain</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#18</link>
<description>I predict that McCain's first act as President will be exactly the same as Bush's first act as President: he will issue an executive order keeping Reagan's and Bush The Elder's presidential records secret for another eight years.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:37:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#17</link>
<description>If there wasn't the tax difference for employers purchasing the benefits no one would want his employer to do it.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:10:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#16</link>
<description>That might be true to some extent but if nothing else changed except the tax code tomorrow, employers would still have an economy of scale advantage and employees would still have an expectation of health coverage. This would almost certainly be met.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:08:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#15</link>
<description>If there wasn't the tax difference for employers purchasing the benefits no one would want his employer to do it.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:02:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#14</link>
<description>That may have been true 60 years ago but in today's free market benefits are a major drawing point for employers trying to attract top talent. That said, I actually like McCain's plan better than Obama's. I also think it has a greater chance of actually be</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:49:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>3fingerspointback: Moderate, and Dysfunctional</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#13</link>
<description>If McCain gets in, he's going to have to deal with some Republican elites that abandoned him to endorse Obama, and another group that has already made plans to focus on Palin as the future of the Republican party. &#160;Right-wing intellectuals will find a</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:45:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#12</link>
<description>The only reason employers buy your health insurance, instead of you yourself, is because of the tax code.* &#160;Seperating health insurance from employment increases the freedom of employees who no longer have to stay at jobs out of concern for health ins</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:41:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: The First Day Of The McCain Presidency.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#11</link>
<description>You've actually elucidated a good chunk of my motivation for doing this series of write-ups. I was trying to think of what a first hundred days of McCain's Presidency would look like and I just couldn't figure it out. Palin aside, I'd like to give the guy </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:25:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Bill Clinton shut down the government?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#10</link>
<description>C'mon, Clinton gets major badass points for that whole thing. He wiped the floor with Gingrich on that one and wasn't afraid to shut down the government to do it. Gingrich blinked first 'cause he underestimated the man's balls. Sadly, so did...okay I won't</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:17:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#9</link>
<description>Why? Why don't you support the freedom of an everyday American to negotiate the best compensation package possible from his or her employer?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:15:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>logan: Bill Clinton shut down the government?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>Bill Clinton played hardball and shut down the government to get his way.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Say what? &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_government_shutdown_of_1995">The 1995 shutdown of the Federal Government&lt;/a> was the brainchild of Ne</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:44:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Look out Irans, pro vikings on the way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#7</link>
<description>McCain's health care proposal is actually good. Seperating insurance from employers is the direction we should be heading. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:43:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: McQuestions: McAnswers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#6</link>
<description>In the increasingly unlikely event McCain wins, his first priorities would be atoning for defeating a colored man. He would probably do this by signing some big increase in spending programs directed at minorities, and by "reaching across the aisle" to sig</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:37:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Where did McCain get his campaign manager?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#5</link>
<description>At some level, McCain still would have needed to attack Obama, if only to do part of the job the press has (by turns) neglected and covered up. Still, I agree that much more weight could have been placed on the single-party government issue you describe. &lt;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:42:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: The First Day Of The McCain Presidency.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#4</link>
<description>It's going to be like the campaign. &#160;He will reveal all these plans of his to capture Osama, fix the economy, solve the energy crisis, and deal with global warming. &#160;The second day, he'll come out with all the changes to the plans he articulated </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:56:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Where did McCain get his campaign manager?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#3</link>
<description>The minute after McCain took the nomination they should have been going straight for the center. With the base as eroded as it is due to the past 8 years, playing to a minority while increasing alienating the rest of the country was a horrible idea. The de</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:26:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: memo: don't type before coffee</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#2</link>
<description>through=throw</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:10:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: A tough job</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/28/143221/68#1</link>
<description>Given Sarah Palin's apparent willingness to through him under the bus, if I were JM I would keep one eye on her, one eye on the issues, and a direct line open to my dermatologist.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:04:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>