<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Setting the Bottom on Setting the Bottom (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464</link>
<description>No need for a long-winded write up on this. &#160;The global financial markets are in the toilet. &#160;The American market is leading the way with yet another &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/07/dowjones.useconomy">retreat of market indices&lt;/a> &lt;i>right after the &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/business/economy/04bailout.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">US government passed&lt;/a> that (US)$700 billion bailout&lt;/i>.  So far this week the US market has &lt;a h</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:29:16 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:18:53 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Calling the bottom (Show your math!)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#33</link>
<description>Found this little snippet in a WSJ article today. &#160;Graham was Warren Buffet's mentor.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;br>&#10;Robert Shiller, professor of finance at Yale University and chief economist for MacroMarkets LLC, tracks what he calls the "Graham P/E," a measur</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:18:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: This is rediculous.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#32</link>
<description>We've mostly had pretty typical bear/crash market interday patterns. &#160;I've always interpreted it as down at open = foreigners and US hedge funds selling, up during the day = retail investors buying, and down at close = US mutual funds selling, probabl</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:41:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Calling the bottom (Show your math!)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#31</link>
<description>As Milo already pointed out, annual economic growth around 3% is a deflated(does not include inflation) number, while stock index growth around 9% is a nominal(includes inflation) number. &#160;Also, even if you match up apples to apples here, they don't n</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:33:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: I should be an Economic Indicator</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#30</link>
<description>I said that bankruptcy sucks, because corporate bondholders have to demand their money too fast. &#160;If the bond contracts were written so that bondholders couldn't demand their money when the company cannot pay, but were compensated when this happens, e</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:49:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Milo: Re: Calling the bottom (Show your math!)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#29</link>
<description>&lt;i>(1.03)^13 = 1.47. The DOW at October 13, 1995 was 4793.79 so I'll call bottom at 4793.79 * 1.47 or 7046.87.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#13;&#10;The only thing to note is that GDP growth is reported as "inflation adjusted".  The stock market isn't.  So, take your 3% growth and add </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:20:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: A News Report From The &quot;Malaise&quot; Of The</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#28</link>
<description>The Dow had hit a record high of 1051 &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.philly.com/philly/news/nation_world/20081010_When_all_are_bearish__time_to_be_bullish.html">earlier that year&lt;/a>.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:27:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: This is rediculous.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#27</link>
<description>It dropped almost 8% down at opening, then held about 3-6% down all day, then suddenly shot up about 3-4% in the green a few minutes ago, now it's holding around neutral a few minutes before close. &lt;p>&#10;Maybe they should just hook &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="ht</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:55:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Calling the bottom (Show your math!)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#26</link>
<description>The tech bubble already burst, though. There was real, tangible creation that occurred from 95-99 that the market won't get rid of except in an overshoot. I think no one can imagine exactly how far the overshoot will go but I think yours is a good baseline</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:42:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: The Good News.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#25</link>
<description>That would be that the stock markets are closed over the weekend. &#160;The bad news is that the Dow, and other indices, &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/10/markets/markets_newyork/index.htm">still haven't reached bottom yet&lt;/a>. &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:33:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Calling the bottom (Show your math!)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#24</link>
<description>Well, the S&amp;P 500 has grown an average of about 9% per year between 1950 and 1995 - if you take that out to 2007, the percentage doesn't actually change much. &#160;So I think 3% might be low.&lt;p>&#10;But - this is what gets me. &#160;How does the overall e</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:23:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Calling the bottom (Show your math!)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#23</link>
<description>How much overshoot? And is 3% a healthy growth rate? As explained above, I know little about the stock markets and I was working in the lab when most of the B-school majors were out getting blizted. &lt;p>&#10;Although, I didn't have to wear all black or anything</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:50:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Calling the bottom (Show your math!)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#22</link>
<description>I'd go for that, but I would expect some overshoot on the down side, especially if we are in for a protracted recession. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:40:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Calling the bottom (Show your math!)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#21</link>
<description>Because I have absolutely no business experience or training, I thought the most productive thing for me to do would be to call where the bottom should be. &lt;p>&#10;I'll assume the market got inflated due to the internet bubble, dot.com boom and property booms </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:29:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: stock market strategy</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#20</link>
<description>It is often a mistake to sell when stocks are going down. &#160;While some businesses will never recover (i.e., Lehman Brothers) most will (probably) go back up. &#160;The first rule of business (as you may recall) is buy low, sell high. &#160;That's how y</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:08:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: I should be an Economic Indicator</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#19</link>
<description>Maybe I'm tired...but I have no idea what that means.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:32:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: I should be an Economic Indicator</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#18</link>
<description>With a rational capitalization model, they would just take their bonds and make them voting preferred stock and make the common stock non-voting until they make large profits, and everyone would be reasonably happy without too much in the way of disruption</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:08:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: I should be an Economic Indicator</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#17</link>
<description>You know the economy is fucked up when when the share prices for companies that have been industrial icons fall so low that I can afford them.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:59:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Oil's Cheap?  Ford Is Cheaper Still.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#16</link>
<description>GM's market cap is now below what it was in 1929.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:58:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Oil's Cheap?  Ford Is Cheaper Still.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#15</link>
<description>You can now own a piece of the company that Henry Ford built &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpposted/archive/2008/10/09/ford-shares-cheaper-than-gas.aspx">for less than a gallon of gas&lt;/a>. &#160;You might just want to kee</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:28:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: No Capitalists In Fox Holes</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#14</link>
<description>Tell me about it. &#160;Just trying to evaluate any stock in the news makes my head hurt trying to guess how much manna they'll be given by King Henry.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:04:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: No Capitalists In Fox Holes</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#13</link>
<description>Twenty years on, &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/front_page/Officials_say_Treasury_would_buy_into_banks.html">communism wins&lt;/a>. Good news is &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/business/20081009_ap_oilfall</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:41:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: How are TnT'ers responding?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#12</link>
<description>I'm still mostly in cash. &#160;Valuations are getting tempting now, but I can't see getting back in until a few more dominoes fall. &#160;The swelling of the Fed's balance sheet makes it clear that helicopter Ben will be dropping enough cash to keep defla</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:39:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>delete me: Re: How are TnT'ers responding?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#11</link>
<description>I had money taken out of my mutual fund late last year once I decided that slight bleeding it was doing was going to get worse with the housing/mortgage crisis I thought was occurring. Seems to be a great idea now. My mother had done the same a little bit </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:15:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: 8500 here we come!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#10</link>
<description>woot! woot! My 401k was off a full 10% over the last two days but now it's only down 3.5%. It wasn't down on the year before this week. That's mainly because it's pointed largely toward South American markets. Gotta love how the socialists run a country th</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:57:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Writing as the markets just went sub-9000.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#9</link>
<description>Ehhh. I don't have any real investments except a couple thousand in low risk mutual funds (or annuities, or whatever) given to me as the tangible thanks of a grateful political subdivision the better part of a decade ago. It had been pulling in 8-12% a yea</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:18:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: Re: How are TnT'ers responding?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#8</link>
<description>My portfolio is about 70% equities and equivalents and about 30% cash and equivalents. I'm not that young any more, but my SO and I still have 20-25 years before we could even think of retiring. Right now I'm just riding it out, resisting the temptation to</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:25:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: How are TnT'ers responding?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#7</link>
<description>Mostly right now, I'm responding by feeling stupid. The only holding in my IRA and 401(k) are &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ssgafunds.com/etf/fund/etf_detail_SPY.jsp">Spiders&lt;/a>, an S&amp;P 500 index fund. I bought a some at around $114 a few weeks </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:20:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: How are TnT'ers responding?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#6</link>
<description>&lt;i>So you are actually thinking about buying?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;At some point...not necessarily right away though. &#160;I agree there's still some time to go before things completely bottom out. &#160;Although I'm not sure that you need to wait for the rock bottom t</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:54:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: How are TnT'ers responding?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#5</link>
<description>So you are actually thinking about buying?&lt;p>&#10;Even assuming we are not going into Mad Max territory, I think we've got a long way to go on the down side here, especially since we've only begun to feel the effects of this crisis outside the financial sector</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:24:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: How are TnT'ers responding?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#4</link>
<description>Well, my wife and I are "lucky" enough to have inherited a relatively (at least, as of our last statement - hah) substantial investment portfolio. &#160;We're also both pretty young, so at the moment we're basically thinking of this as a nice long term inv</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:04:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: How are TnT'ers responding?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#3</link>
<description>I'd be interested in everybody's practical reaction to the market tumult. &#160;Do you plan to sell your stocks? &#160;Have you sold already? &#160;Have you cashed out your 401k, bought krugerands and sown them into your clothing? &#160;Or are you sitting </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 06:55:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Setting the Bottom on Setting the Bottom</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#2</link>
<description>&lt;i>I heard the Dow was down 800 points yesterday. &#160;That kind of surprised me, because I didn't think there were 800 points left.&lt;/i>-- Stephen Colbert</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:55:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: $2 Trillion Just Disappeared.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/10/7/101518/464#1</link>
<description>That's what the head of the Congressional Budget Office said happened to the value in retirement funds and 401Ks over the past month. &#160;Not good news for all those people looking to have a nice quiet retirement.&lt;p>&#10;As I checked the stock market indices</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:37:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>