<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Holy Screaming Meemies - Howard Dean Vacating DNC Post (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72</link>
<description>Physician, former governor of Vermont, and one-time presidential candidate Howard Dean confirmed recently that he will honor his pledge to just serve one four year term as head of the Democratic National Committee, and hence &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081110/ap_on_el_pr/democrats_dean">will be stepping down this January&lt;/a>.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:24:16 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:33:26 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: 'traditionally trended republican'</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72#12</link>
<description>Yes, Colorado has gradually been trending more Democratic lately, as has Virginia. &#160;In fact, if you sort the states by Obama's victory margin, at 9% Colorado works out to be the national swing state this election. &#160;Obama could have lost NH,FL,OH,</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:33:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>strangeluck: Re: Will The Dems Rue This Day?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72#11</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>Was Dean just lucky enough to be in charge when the Republicans imploded? Or were Democrats lucky to have someone like Dean in place to take advantage of the situation and extend their sway in to previously untouchable districts?&lt;/blockquote>&lt;p</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:40:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>shane: Re: 'traditionally trended republican'</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72#10</link>
<description>Your are right in what you are saying, in the memory of many voters it has only gone once democratic &#160;My real issue I guess is that it leaves the 47% of people in Colorado who voted democratic in 2004 feeling disenfranchised, which further erodes the </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:34:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: 'traditionally trended republican'</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72#9</link>
<description>In defense of myself, I think that when we're talking politics, the most relevant period of time to look at is about as far back as the maximum likely age of the voting public. &#160;Probably about the oldest age cohort that votes in any meaningful numbers</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:07:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>T Slothrop: You have to understand &quot;media time&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72#8</link>
<description>"Traditionally" means since Reagan. "Historically" means since 1960 or so. They don't have terms for any further back than that because who can count that high?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:51:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: 'traditionally trended republican'</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72#7</link>
<description>This is one of those things that bothers me as well. It's a very surface, very useless attempt to come across like you're analyzing a situation. It's never any real indicator of future behavior; it's such a compulsive obsession with past results that aren'</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:49:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>shane: Re: 'traditionally trended republican'</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72#6</link>
<description>Ok so I have trouble counting. &#160;Four states, 9 times in 100 years and 35% of the time.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:09:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>shane: 'traditionally trended republican'</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72#5</link>
<description>This phrase bugs me. &#160;The media likes to say it a lot - so and so traditionally trends republican. &#160;Looking into just one of the three states mentioned above (Colorado, North Carolina, Virginia, and Indiana) I see that Colorado doesn't trend repu</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:04:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Dean Played A Part.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72#4</link>
<description>But Obama won through a combination of things:&lt;p>&#10;&#10;&lt;ol>&#10;&lt;li value="1">&#160;An unpopular president in office from the opposite party.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;li value="2">&#160;A smart, savvy campaign with Obama at the head.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;li value="3">&#160;An economy that imploded at </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:07:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Will The Dems Rue This Day?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72#3</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; &#160;Well, that depends on how you piece together the cause and effect of the last two elections. Was Dean just lucky enough to be in charge when the Republicans imploded? Or were Democrats lucky to have someone like Dean in place to take ad</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:51:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Holy Screaming Meemies - Howard Dean Vacating</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72#2</link>
<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/11/12/dean/">Salon is running an article&lt;/a> today that gives Dean credit for Obama's victory - thoughts?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:50:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Holy Screaming Meemies - Howard Dean Vacating</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/10/183318/72#1</link>
<description>I just want to second meyotch's comment in the sub-q - I think that the fifty state strategy paid off dividends and that it needs to be continued. &#160;Demographics generally favor the Dems right now, but in a lot of states there just aren't credible Demo</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:34:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>