<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>In Texas, Habeas Corpus Means We Hold The Prisoner Until We Say So. (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/1523/4379</link>
<description>Raul Meza's life is not what you might call a success story. &#160;Starting out as a violent criminal at the age of 15 and sexually molesting and murdering an eight-year-old girl along the way, Meza is not a particularly sympathetic character. &#160;But, for all of the 48-year-old Meza's transgressions, he says he's done all the prison time required by the law and he wants a bit of freedom. &#160;The state of Texas disagrees and has held him past his parole date at a minimum security prison in Travis County</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:51:21 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:28:39 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Hold The Prisoner Until We Say So.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/1523/4379#4</link>
<description>&lt;i>Criminals have long used their real or imaginary religious conversions to justify their release from prison&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Religious piety doesn't seem to have much effect on the unconvicted, either, based on the behavior of various public Christians.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:28:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: There is precedent for this.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/1523/4379#3</link>
<description>Texas is changing how they treat convicted offenders who were "in the system" during the law revision. This has happened before. Look at sex offenders. There were hundreds incarcerated, on parole, probation or some type of supervised release when the regis</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:45:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: In Texas, Habeas Corpus Means We Hold The Pris</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/1523/4379#2</link>
<description>As far as I can tell, the "mandatory supervision" clause basically says that if you're going to be paroled before you serve your entire sentence, you have to prove certain things to be true (e.g. get a job, etc.). &#160;Since parole is entirely optional, a</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:43:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Hold The Prisoner Until We Say So.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/1523/4379#1</link>
<description>The obvious comparison of this situation is to the famous "three strikes and you're out" law in California. &#160;Essentially, when you have repeat offenders who have already proved that they cannot be trusted, it serves the interest of public safety to ke</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:21:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>