<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Senator Advocates Required Purchase of Health Care (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05</link>
<description>Employees for drug maker Schering-Plough Corp. and New York Life Insurance Co. gave more money to Max Baucus than employees of &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.greatfallstribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081026/NEWS01/81026003">any other company&lt;/a> in the most election cycle, which saw the Montana Democrat returned to the Senate for the sixth time. A mere week after winning, Baucus has called for a massive socialization of the American healthcare system which would require that all Americans buy i</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:20:08 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:43:12 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Economist advocates cutting medicine in half</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#15</link>
<description>Any politician advocating it would be assailed by demagogues claiming the 50% being cut was the half that paid for Tiny Tim's crutches.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:43:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: universal health insurance</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#14</link>
<description>The easiest and most effective way of creating universal health insurance is not to require people to buy health insurance and to fine those who don't, but to simply GIVE people health insurance. &#160;Here in the province of Ontario, where I live and type</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 08:56:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: syntax</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#13</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Independent polls tend to support universal healthcare options&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>What does that mean?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:34:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Economist advocates cutting medicine in half</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#12</link>
<description>duh...But how does he hope to accomplish that with the power and influence consolidated within the pharmaceutical industry over the past generation?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:32:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Senator Advocates Required Purchase of Health</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#11</link>
<description>We may very well be talking past each other here. The plan being put forth by Baucus would not replace Health Management Organizations. It would create "universal" care by compelling everyone to buy into the existing system thus magically making the existi</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:22:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>permazorch: Re: Senator Advocates Required Purchase of Health</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#10</link>
<description>&lt;i>doctors and administrators working the system is an issue that needs addressed as well.&lt;/i>&lt;br>&#10;Definitely agreed.&lt;p>&#10;If it were only possible to modulate the amount of money blasted at medicos with the amount dripping to educators, I think we'd have a </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:50:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Economist advocates cutting medicine in half</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#9</link>
<description>The problem isn't how much we spend, it's where we spend it. &#160;A significant portion of our healthcare cost is spent in the last hours before an unavoidable death. &#160;I don't mean that we spend a lot of money trying to save people who're 28 and may </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:39:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Economist advocates cutting medicine in half</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#8</link>
<description>I've linked to &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/09/10/robin-hanson/cut-medicine-in-half/">Robin Hanson explaining why we should cut spending on medicine in half&lt;/a> before, but it's so entertaining I'm doing it again. Some highlight</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:26:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Senator Advocates Required Purchase of Health</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#7</link>
<description>How do you get universal healthcare without making it compulsory? &#160;&lt;br>&#10;How do you figure that HMOs want to be replaced by universal healthcare?&lt;p>&#10;And why do you believe a "poll" about government-related healthcare that was created and executed by a </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:42:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>1fastdog: Re: Senator Advocates Required Purchase of Health</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#6</link>
<description>&lt;i>Any plan that rewards health insurance companies is a non-starter, for me.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;While the insurance companies have certainly done some awful things to people, it's the doctors and hospital administrators that game the system to so much detriment. Whil</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:42:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Senator Advocates Required Purchase of Health</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#5</link>
<description>It's quite a jump from universal to compulsory. HMOs &lt;i>do&lt;/i> want health care regulation--I know this is cognitive dissonance for the knee jerk liberal reaction but they want exactly the regulation Baucus is pushing.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:23:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Re: Senator Advocates Required Purchase of Health</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#4</link>
<description>Both the "polls" and the "analysis" links are from the Wall Street Journal quoting the &#160;National Center for Policy Reform, titled in their site as "A leader in promoting private alternatives to government regulation and control" and Campaign for Consu</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:21:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>permazorch: Re: Senator Advocates Required Purchase of Health</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#3</link>
<description>Any plan that rewards health insurance companies is a non-starter, for me. The pharmaceutical giants and health insurance bloodsuckers are the criminals who should have to pay for nationalized health care.&lt;p>&#10;But, I'm a crank, and sensible people should no</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:28:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Senator Advocates Required Purchase of Health</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#2</link>
<description>Wow, that's even worse...if I recall correctly, Hillary's plan called for allowing those earning over $75,000 to not have to purchase health care.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:59:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: Senator Advocates Required Purchase of Health</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/12/194317/05#1</link>
<description>I wonder if Baucus' plan (and potentially Obama's plan) is like the &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_2006_Health_Reform_Statute">Massachusetts plan&lt;/a> which mandates that every person must obtain healthcare insurance. &amp;nb</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:11:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>