<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>What's The Plan: Just Give Detroit The Money Or Bailout For American Car Buyer? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849</link>
<description>If the Big Three automakers want a piece of the (US)$700 billion bailout Congress has its icy grip on, they have until December 2nd to &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a555iICMi8xY&amp;refer=home">come up with a plan&lt;/a>. &#160;What the automakers are looking for is a bridge loan to get them to the point in time when credit markets loosen up to the point they can borrow enough money to continue operating. &#160;The only other alternative on the table right now </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:15:27 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Dec 2008 20:20:51 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#25</link>
<description>I agree with this. The government would be much better off taking the money and using it to seed several start ups.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Dec 2008 20:20:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#24</link>
<description>Shouldn't we be figuring out what our limit is before we start doling out cash (too late now, I know)? The $700B bailout that was supposed to stabilize our economy was apparently not enough. Now state governors want cash. When does it end?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:50:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>1fastdog: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#23</link>
<description>&lt;i>Honestly, when will it end?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I dunno, but I don't think it's a good idea to put 3 million people out of work. That costs a boatload of money, too, and with nothing tangible to show for it. There are no "good" solutions in this situation.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2008 17:01:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#22</link>
<description>The history of this country is filled with corporations who have failed. Life has gone on, it is painful, it sucks, but eventually it has to work itself out. Otherwise, what do you suggest? What if The Big 3 go to congress in 6 months and say "Hey, the bai</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:48:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>1fastdog: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#21</link>
<description>&lt;i>I'm not really comfortable with allowing a bailout simply because these CEOs portend to hold the economy hostage.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Like it or not, a very large sector of our economy depends on the big 3.&lt;br>&#10;Think not? &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://answers.yahoo</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:40:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#20</link>
<description>&lt;i> Mostly, the argument goes, because it's more than just the big 3 who'll go down if they don't get help. There's certainly lots of other suppliers, manufacturers, etc from other industries that will go down with them. That's a lot of jobs lost and a lot</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:46:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>1fastdog: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#19</link>
<description>&lt;i>Why should the Big 3 be deserving of a government bailout&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Mostly, the argument goes, because it's more than just the big 3 who'll go down if they don't get help. There's certainly lots of other suppliers, manufacturers, etc from other industries </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 19:27:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#18</link>
<description>&lt;i>Your points, as always, are well taken. However, if accepted it just boils down to an argument that the company is just "too big" to let fail. Why should the Big 3 be deserving of a government bailout simply due to size when we would all demand the same</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 19:13:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#17</link>
<description>Your points, as always, are well taken. However, if accepted it just boils down to an argument that the company is just "too big" to let fail. Why should the Big 3 be deserving of a government bailout simply due to size when we would all demand the same be</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:09:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#16</link>
<description>The notion that US autoworkers are excessively well paid is largely a canard. &#160;The $70 an hour figure &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=1026e955-541c-4aa6-bcf2-56dfc3323682">that is bandied about is largely a result of </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:44:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#15</link>
<description>Tens of billions of dollars in bailout cash to a company with &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/economy/images/wm2135_chart1.gif">outrageously high labor costs&lt;/a> compared to its competition. These companies have saddled themselves </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:33:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#14</link>
<description>&lt;i>I think the company stands a better shot of solving its long term problems via court order and bankruptcy&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;You're more than welcome to think that, but you still haven't made a convincing argument for why it's so. &#160;Again, just sayin'</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:27:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#13</link>
<description>&lt;i> That's a rather weak argument to bet the future of one of America's largest corporations on. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;As opposed to giving failing corporations billions of dollars, the same corporations whose only real major change in their business practices is going </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:25:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#12</link>
<description>&lt;i>They are afraid that their customers, many of whom are still buying ginormous SUVs and making other foolhardy money decisions, will be smart enough to follow the news and connect the dots? I'm sorry, but I don't have much faith in the average consumer.&lt;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:16:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeeter1: American car buyer? Not if I can help it</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#11</link>
<description>Right now, I'm driving an Oldsmobile, and we know what happened to them. &#160;Ditto for Plymouth. &#160;Pontiac, Buick, Mercury look to be headed to the same fate. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;I went out shopping for a new car last month, and have my heart set on a Honda Fi</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:47:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#10</link>
<description>&lt;i> The big reason is that they're afraid that if they declare bankruptcy, people will stop buying their cars. &#160;&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;They are afraid that their customers, many of whom are still buying ginormous SUVs and making other foolhardy money decisions, will</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:58:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#9</link>
<description>The big reason is that they're afraid that if they declare bankruptcy, people will stop buying their cars. &#160;Chapter 11 (which allows for reorganization) is just one step away from Chapter 7 (which requires liquidation). &#160;A large part of buy a car</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:49:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Why don't they just declare bankruptcy?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#8</link>
<description>I'm not being facetious. I'm serious.&lt;p>&#10;They have a major problem with labor costs and legacy issues. It's obvious the unions won't give up their cash cow. Bankruptcy court could be the best way to address these problems. It's not like they are lacking in</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:40:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: plan</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#7</link>
<description>Pretty much, yeah.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:22:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: plan</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#6</link>
<description>Does that explain why auto companies are expected to have a plan while the financial sector does not?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:31:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: plan</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#5</link>
<description>Banks need to have cash reserves &lt;i>and&lt;/i> operating capital to stay in business; manufacturers only need operating capital.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:12:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: As heard on the radio</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#4</link>
<description>I'm wondering what the utility of a recovery plan might be myself. &#160;One one thing, the automakers are looking to borrow $25 billion for three months. &#160;I highly doubt the auto industry is going to right itself in three months. &#160;By the time th</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:17:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>shane: maybe, but</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#3</link>
<description>The idea to give a $10,000 tax deduction on the purchase of new cars would certainly help sell more cars. &#160;Given other goals, such as reducing C02 output, is this really something we want to do? &#160;There are many ways to improve this plan while try</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:15:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: As heard on the radio</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#2</link>
<description>I heard something interesting on the drive in from work. &#160;The reporter mentioned that Congress was looking for the Big 3 to have a plan before they coughed up the money. &#160;All well and good...but then he asked the person he was interviewing if the</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:30:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>songofthepogo: Re: What's The Plan: Just Give Detroit The Money O</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/25/93159/849#1</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>Uh, songofthepogo? Tesla are an American car company. They design and build the cars in Silicon Valley.&lt;/blockquote>&lt;br>&#10;yes, i'm fully aware of that, logan. &#160;i was merely pointing out that the proposed alternative bill would apply to more</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:29:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>