<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>The Biggest Loser (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/7/93543/2522</link>
<description>Let's look past the obvious. &#160;I mean even John McCain and Sarah Palin and the rest of the Republican Party deserves a break at this point. &#160;No, this story is about another loser, but you can jump in with your nominations for loserdom. &#160;First and foremost from Tuesday's blow-out is US Senator &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Lieberman">Joseph Lieberman&lt;/a> (D - CT).</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:17:38 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:55:10 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>permazorch: Re: Ok, No more hating on Lieberman.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/7/93543/2522#10</link>
<description>&lt;i>just kinda waiting for them to end.&lt;/i>&lt;br>&#10;That was exactly what my pop's take on 'em was, last January.&lt;p>&#10;Firing those folks was pretty cold-blooded.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:55:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Ok, No more hating on Lieberman.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/7/93543/2522#9</link>
<description>It's just been so obviously coming for years. Remember that bit about how they &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17837882/">fired all their employees who made more than like $10 an hour&lt;/a>? And apparently how they'd done that every coupl</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:55:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>permazorch: Ok, No more hating on Lieberman.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/7/93543/2522#8</link>
<description>I am here to hate on Circuit City!&lt;br>&#10;God, they suck rotten eggses! I went to two stores (one in Indiana and one in Maryland, just outside of D.C. proper), and was ignored and otherwise given crappy service.&lt;br>&#10;I'm glad those losers are going under!&lt;br>&#10;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:18:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thalia: Stop hating on Lieberman</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/7/93543/2522#7</link>
<description>Give the man some love for caucusing with the Democrats in 2006. &#160;If he had bailed then, the Senate would've stayed in Republican control (at 50-50 split, it stays with the previously in-power party). &#160;Which would've meant the Republicans keeping</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:16:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>delete me: Re: Let bygones be bygones</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/7/93543/2522#6</link>
<description>Five days, just a day shorter than a war.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Nov 2008 18:02:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Let bygones be bygones</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/7/93543/2522#5</link>
<description>&lt;i>There's just no way Lieberman could credibly fulfill that role of being an impartial arbiter.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Not even for six weeks?</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Nov 2008 13:47:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Let bygones be bygones</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/7/93543/2522#4</link>
<description>I realize you were being completely facetious, but leaving that aside, even if Lieberman had supported Obama and not McCain he would still be a bad choice for State. &#160;From a pragmatic standpoint, having someone at State who is a a whole-hearted Zionis</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Nov 2008 08:36:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Let bygones be bygones</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/7/93543/2522#3</link>
<description>Obama should choose Lieberman to be his Secretary of State. &#160;Lieberman would bring a wealth of knowledge, experience and respect to the position, and it would seal Obama's reputation as truly bipartisan.&lt;p>&#10;Then about six weeks after the inauguration,</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Nov 2008 02:44:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Acefantastik: Re: I'd Respect Lieberman If</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/7/93543/2522#2</link>
<description>Lindsey Graham and Chuck Hagel didn't vote with Democrats 80+% of the time. &#160;Hell, Lincoln Chaffee and Susan Collins were reliably Republican on issues that Lieberman votes Dem on. &#160;If Joe Lieberman changes parties, he will be more popular than P</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Nov 2008 20:50:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: I'd Respect Lieberman If</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/11/7/93543/2522#1</link>
<description>...he became a Republican. He fits in with the Lindsay Graham, Chuck Hagel type. Right now, he just seems a little used car salesman-y.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:33:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>