<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Whoever Accused Advertising Of Being Tasteless? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/14/102726/158</link>
<description>&lt;I>Somehow I think the porn potential isn't there - &lt;b>Degee&lt;/b>&lt;/i>
&lt;P>
What with "&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scratch_and_sniff">scratch and sniff&lt;/a>" ads, magazines offer another level of product exposure unavailable to radio or TV advertising.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:05:20 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:01:36 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Degee: Re: Porn Potential?  Been Done.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/14/102726/158#9</link>
<description>You'd think those fishermen would have had enough... no I won't go there.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:01:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Porn Potential?  Been Done.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/14/102726/158#8</link>
<description>I was a fishing guide at a remote lodge on the BC coast for a few seasons, and as you can imagine there were a few porn mags floating around the bunkhouse. &#160;One, in the early eighties, was a Hustler mag which had a fold-out featuring a "scratch-and-sn</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:22:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Eh, Wot?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/14/102726/158#7</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; The idea of "scratch and taste" seems kind of inevitable, considering the various marketing ploys already tried (on various scales) in the '50s: theater seats that vibrated or shocked some customers, small X-ray machines that showed the bones</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:07:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Who will buy these ads?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/14/102726/158#6</link>
<description>Even more than the germs, I am more weirded out by the processing of artificial flavors or whatever that is going on to produce these peel and licks.&lt;p>&#10;This is from the Wall Street Journal article:&lt;br>&#10;&lt;i>The company, which is owned by a cooperative of gr</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:46:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Coelacanth: Re: Who will buy these ads?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/14/102726/158#5</link>
<description>Given that a three or four year old could just as well be licking the floor of a public restroom, just because you told her not to, a six month old copy of People is just fine.&lt;p>&#10;Disgusting and stupid idea anyway, of course.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:01:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Too Much or not Enough</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/14/102726/158#4</link>
<description>The history of advertising (a la Thomas Frank) shows that it has always been edgy and that people are more than willing to unconsciously readjust their senses/mores/values to whatever is edgy advertising. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;If advertising was too perceptible by com</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:43:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Too Much or not Enough</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/14/102726/158#3</link>
<description>Taste is mostly smell, &#160;Thus, anything that tastes significantly is going to smell. &#160;And a significant number people are going to refuse to buy any magazine which smells different, or will have an allergy to it. &#160;To make money on anything li</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:29:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>shane: Re: Who will buy these ads?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/14/102726/158#2</link>
<description>I'm sure the scientists involved have done long term, peer reviewed, accurate and unbiased testing that proves, without a doubt, that there are no health risks to these ads. :)</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:01:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>3fingerspointback: Who will buy these ads?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/14/102726/158#1</link>
<description>Name-brand perfumes can get away with this, because they can put the actual perfume in the paper, and WYSmellIWYG. &#160;But for a beverage, they're either forced to put in a taste that's different from their product, or they're forced to admit just how fa</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:03:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>