<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Academic Freedom... It's just been revoked. (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815</link>
<description>As the community of Northern Illinois University &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gx6f_CZjPrQxbJcWv_sZ4JUXcZJg">copes with the aftermath&lt;/a> of a recent shooting which left &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.torontodailynews.com/index.php/WorldNews/2008021503six-dead-reported">half a dozen dead&lt;/a>, college administrators, students, police and government contractors angling for revenue all begin the process of making our university campuses "safer."</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:08:05 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:23:20 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the foot</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#58</link>
<description>&lt;i> But ultimately, I suppose that my reaction is more visceral rather than logical. &#160;There is an idealistic streak in me that thinks that crime should be better controlled, that it shouldn't have to come down to individuals having to defend ourselves</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:23:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the foot</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#57</link>
<description>I had to think about your reply and my initial reaction for awhile to sort through and understand why I veer towards being pro gun-control.&lt;p>&#10;I've shot guns at a few ranges (not well) with guns borrowed from a friend who is a gun-collector. &#160;And ther</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:02:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: frame of reference is flawed.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#56</link>
<description>culture causes trauma. if there's a culture of competitiveness and a lack of compassion say in an office environment with someone like Milton from office space just because I watched it again last night, then that culture causes trauma which leads to Milto</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:51:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: frame of reference is flawed.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#55</link>
<description>I guess I don't know when the trauma counts. &#160;But trauma is not the same as "culture."</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:33:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: frame of reference is flawed.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#54</link>
<description>&lt;i>I don't accept that our "culture" is a major contributor to personality disorders.  Childhood trauma and genetics play a much bigger role.&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;you accept childhood trauma but not adult trauma?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:14:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#53</link>
<description>&lt;i>I'll give you the Cliffs Notes version: The student protesters were the bad guys and the National Guard were the good guys. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Everyone thinks he's the good guy and his victim is the bad guy. &#160;But shooting at unarmed people makes you, no matte</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:20:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#52</link>
<description>You seem to be confused about the basic facts of the situation. I'll give you the Cliffs Notes version: The student protesters were the bad guys and the National Guard were the good guys. The good guys were sent in to enforce the law. If the bad guys had b</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:06:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#51</link>
<description>&lt;i>The students provoked the National Guard troops&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Translation: "It's not my fault, she knows how I get."</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:44:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#50</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Not one student shot anyone, and yet you continue to blame them for the deaths&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>The students provoked the National Guard troops with wanton disregard for the possible consequences. Of course they shoulder some of the blame.&lt;p></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:42:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Two different things</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#49</link>
<description>I used to be very pro-carry, but then I lived in a state (Alaska) where open carry is legal. &#160;The only people I ever saw carrying guns (except when they were going out into the woods) were people I didn't think had the maturity or good sense to handle</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:40:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Two different things</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#48</link>
<description>&lt;i> Yes, you're full of crap on it. &#160;I'm a gun owner, and I went through training to properly fill out and sign a check. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I apologize. Because I don't think my explanation was clear enough. Sure, in some states the requirements for gun ownershi</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:26:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#47</link>
<description>&lt;i>Would you trust me to throw rocks and bottles at the "pigs"?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Not only that, but I fully expect to see you on the barricades in front of the cigar salon once the liberals take power.&lt;p>&#10;Fight the power, Z...Fight the power.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:52:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#46</link>
<description>Not one student shot anyone, and yet you continue to blame them for the deaths. &#160;I wouldn't trust you with any sort of weapon, whether gun, bottle or rock. &#160;No doubt you would claim that anyone you hurt had it coming.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:26:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#45</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>One of the main principles of anger management is taking responsibility for your own actions&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I don't doubt that there were many students who took part in the protests and later felt &#160;guilt and remorse because of the kill</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:51:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#44</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...ordered in National Guard troops with no police training with only lethal weapons and little in the way of riot gear, instead of mobilizing police from across the state&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>The National Guard wasn't sent in to write summonses </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:46:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Two different things</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#43</link>
<description>&lt;i>I would assume gun owners (somebody tell me if I am full of crap on this) would go through training in "Real Life" self-defense uses of their weapons to avoid freezing up.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Yes, you're full of crap on it. &#160;I'm a gun owner, and I went through </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:25:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#42</link>
<description>&lt;i>Why does all the blame get pinned on the National Guardsmen &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Because they had the guns.&lt;p>&#10;One of the main principles of anger management is taking responsibility for your own actions. &#160;The kind of people who get sent to anger management typ</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:19:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#41</link>
<description>Actually, I do. &#160;After all, he's the one who ordered in National Guard troops with no police training with only lethal weapons and little in the way of riot gear, instead of mobilizing police from across the state.&lt;p>&#10;After all, we can't be serious wi</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:30:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#40</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Isn't there enough blame for both?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Yeah, sure. Why not? In fact, why not blame it on the governor, too? He's the one who ordered the troops in. It's not the protester's fault that the governor was so serious about his job.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:10:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#39</link>
<description>Isn't there enough blame for both?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:40:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#38</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>If you approve of them deliberately shooting two students on the way to class far away from the protests...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>That's a hell of an "if."&lt;p>&#10;I do not approve of shooting students, but the Kent State shootings were clearly the res</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:39:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#37</link>
<description>The National Guard is by and large trained to shoot things first and ask questions later. &#160;If we're going to plan to use them as the police force of last resort, they need to be trained in police tactics, which they aren't.&lt;p>&#10;When Johnson sent in the</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:13:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#36</link>
<description>If you approve of them deliberately shooting two students on the way to class far away from the protests, I assume you would approve of shooting the rest of the students at Kent State? &#160;After all, why should those two be special?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:52:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Kent State Death Match</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#35</link>
<description>The Malefactors vs The Campus Shooters</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:10:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#34</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I invite you to read the entire wikipedia entry. &#160;It goes on to say that officials tried to cover up what happened...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I read it. So what? Misbehavior on the part of the officials or National Guard in no way ameliorates t</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:13:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: &quot;Right here! Got Set! Point! Fire!&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#33</link>
<description>"Wait, are you talking about the National Guard or the campus rabble?"&lt;p>&#10;I'm talking about Chrissy Hynde</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:10:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: &quot;Right here! Got Set! Point! Fire!&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#32</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...why use a nutcracker when a sledgehammer will do just as well&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Wait, are you talking about the National Guard or the campus rabble?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:08:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Right?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#31</link>
<description>Hey, look at it this way. If all those college kids had been packing, they could have defended themselves!</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:49:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: frame of reference is flawed.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#30</link>
<description>The point is not that guns dissuade psycopaths, but that guns will kill psycopaths. &#160;Or, better than that, subdue them so that they can be apprehended and prosecuted. That's what happened in the Appalachian School of Law incident: &#160;students, arme</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:57:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Who's to blame?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#29</link>
<description>On the one hand, we have a bunch of college kids out &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings">protesting the American invasion of Cambodia&lt;/a>. &#160;They got loud. &#160;They probably threw shit at the National Guard. &amp;nb</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:10:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Two different things</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#28</link>
<description>&lt;i> I've thought about that myself. &#160;I'm pretty cool under stress, but If I happened to be armed and on the site in the Virginia Tech incident, I wonder if I could have distinguished between the actual shooter and some other armed citizen attempting t</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:57:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the foot</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#27</link>
<description>I am not sure I agree with that. As a non-gun owner I have read that in one study, permit holders in Florida were found to be &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/3574822.html">500 times less likely&lt;/a> to commit violent </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:51:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Two different things</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#26</link>
<description>&lt;i> How many people would act with the coolness of Jeanne Assam and take down a classroom shooter? &#160;Or how many would be diving under desks, flipping out, blasting indiscriminately or shooting himself like this trained professional.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I've though</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:33:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the foot</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#25</link>
<description>If one assumes that anyone can become mentally unstable (as there's no test that can guarantee 100 percent that a person will never be mentally unstable in the future) and extends a concealed weapon permit to all citizens of good character, there is expone</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:40:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: &quot;Right here! Get Set! Point! Fire!&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#24</link>
<description>This existence of this &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings#Monday.2C_May_4">audio&lt;/a>(scroll down) gives some credence that the shots were aimed...that and the FBI later found out that one of the campus shooters bragge</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:59:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Thugs</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#23</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>The campus shooters aimed at the people that were farthest away from them&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I've never heard that before - unless by "aimed" you meant "happened to be pointing their rifles in the general direction."&lt;p>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Two of th</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:14:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the foot</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#22</link>
<description>Exactly. So there is nothing mystical or special about police officers that should make them the only people &#160;able to carry legally (within reason as mentioned above). Therefore, the right to choose to carry a concealed weapon should be extended to al</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:18:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the foot</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#21</link>
<description>And there's the lovely case of the police officer who told a 13 year old girl that he had bought her from her parents and then proceeded to prositute her. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;No one's infallible. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:48:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Thugs</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#20</link>
<description>Yeah...except for the part where...&lt;br>&#10;-The whole thing was essentially over&lt;br>&#10;-The campus shooters aimed at the people that were farthest away from them.&lt;br>&#10;-Two of the people killed were walking between classes...one of them was an ROTC student.&lt;p>&#10;N</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:52:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the foot</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#19</link>
<description>&lt;i> But this assumes that the person who was mentally stable at the time of the psych exam will remain stable. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Then how come people have no problems with giving police officers firearms, even off duty, and after they retire &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:37:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: frame of reference is flawed.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#18</link>
<description>The assumptions behind much of the links and inherent to the poll is that a) university students require protection above and beyond that of the rest of society and b) the students themselves are incapable of self-protection.&lt;p>&#10;In the past year I can reca</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:35:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the foot</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#17</link>
<description>&lt;i>If somebody is stable enough to pass a background check, possible psych exam, fingerprint clearance and obtain the technical training to operate a firearm safely and effectively then who cares where they bring it (usual caveats such as on airplanes and </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:01:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Not him</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#16</link>
<description>No, definitely not. The protests at Tienanmen Square were peaceful civil disobedience, but the National Guard at Kent State was met by violent thugs in the guise of students. Also, the Chinese people are subjects of a totalitarian state while the violent t</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:10:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Two different things</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#15</link>
<description>&lt;i> Which leads to another wondering...why didn't anyone do anything? &#160;I can only assume that there were students at the school who had some of the training you mentioned. &#160;If someone has the presence of mind to use a gun in a situation, wouldn't</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:50:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Not him</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#14</link>
<description>&lt;i>That student is like that guy from Tianamen Square who stood in front of the tank!&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Not really...you're probably thinking about some of the kids at &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/65/Kent_State_massacre.jpg">Kent</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:12:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Two different things</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#13</link>
<description>&lt;i>and if somebody is qualified and trusted to pack heat off campus, why not on campus?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Well, I really don't have a dog in this fight. &#160;Why? &#160;Even if I wanted to, I wouldn't carry a gun on me...because I am not 100% sure I could kill someb</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:07:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Two different things</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#12</link>
<description>&lt;i> How am I going to get the guns to the school with Illinois' tough non-carry laws. If I carry these guns around outside of their cases on my way to kill people, I'll be breaking the law. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Exactly. I was saddened to see after the shenanigans at Vi</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:05:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Two different things</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#11</link>
<description>According to your link, Illinois has the toughest &lt;i>Right To Carry&lt;/i> laws in the country. &#160;In fact, I would say that not being able to carry at all (If I read that NRA webpage correctly)) is pretty damn tough. &#160;However...the right to carry is </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:55:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: A real world alternative.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#10</link>
<description>Former grad students who decide to go off their meds. &#160;Personally, I'd prefer a college campus to be clean of all firearms. &#160;But, if I had my druthers, I'd rather that your average frat boy had a gun than your average person with mental health is</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:52:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: four words</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#9</link>
<description>Even if those same frat boys have military experience? Even if those same frat boys are more mature than some of the uneducated firearms owners out there? &lt;p>&#10;I knew a ton of people in college who were not in a Greek program and were horribly immature, dea</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:16:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: four words</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#8</link>
<description>Frat boys with guns.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:00:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the fat</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#7</link>
<description>By the way, the protest that Isserman was discussing in that article was the same one when Abbie Hoffman said they were going to use psychic energy to levitate the Pentagon. &lt;p>&#10;Here's that &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/vox/m</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:44:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the fat</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#6</link>
<description>Yeah, I know it happened once: I've seen the photo. What I wonder is if it happened more than once. I also wonder if there were more than two or three large antiwar protests. Sort of like there is a popular image that there were a lot of bra burnings at fe</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:18:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the fat</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#5</link>
<description>I must confess I am a bit confused as to what you are getting at, but a quick Google turned up &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://chronicle.com/temp/reprint.php?id=2dzq654n1rhcmykfxk4jpw383pvpr0nt">an article&lt;/a> describing the flower in the MP's gun barrel at</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:06:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the fat</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#4</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Where did all those pictures of people putting flowers down the barrels of guns come from?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Was there more than one such picture? Were the guns held by MPs?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:41:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the fat</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#3</link>
<description>Every time a cop pulls somebody over and is declined permission to search the car without a warrant, or a person declines to answer unrelated questions during an interaction with the police, etc then a person is flexing their civil rights during an interac</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:23:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Gun-control people shot themselves in the fat</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#2</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>These are the same professors that likely advocate flexing civil rights at traffic stops by gun toting police or protested the Vietnam War in the face of armed MPs&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Did that ever really happen?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:54:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Gun-control people shot themselves in the foot.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/18/102356/815#1</link>
<description>I'm not a lawyer or a gun owner, so take what I say with a grain of salt. I read somewhere after this horrific event that Illinois has some of the &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nraila.org/images/rtcmaplg.jpg">toughest firearms control laws in the coun</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:18:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>