<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>The Army Wants YOU to join the US National Guard of Iraq, Afghanistan, and South Korea (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062</link>
<description>As the Small Wonder &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080222/NEWS/80222044">contemplates a life without its elected Attorney General&lt;/a>, other communities across the country are coping with the loss of their hometown police, teachers, doctors and other professionals. </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:47:41 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2008 19:20:39 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Not everything goes the A-10's way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#24</link>
<description>Good point. &#160;The AC-130 generally flies above the altitude shoulder-fired SAMS can reach, but is still vulnerable to the smaller non-man-portable missiles. &#160;The A-10 has a small IR signature as well as flares and commonly flies low enough to be d</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2008 19:20:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Not everything goes the A-10's way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#23</link>
<description>Well, you go with your strengths in any situation. &#160;It's hard to argue with a population of 1.3 billion. &#160;And, if the stories about Chinese parents aborting girl fetuses in favor of males is true then there will be plenty of folks to carry around</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2008 18:21:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Not everything goes the A-10's way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#22</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>Is it just me, or does Chinese war doctrine mostly center around a lack of respect for human life and bum-rushing their enemies until they run out of ammo?&lt;/blockquote>It worked for the Soviets in WWII.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2008 18:21:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Not everything goes the A-10's way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#21</link>
<description>&lt;i> Given that the Chinese can make assloads of these things and they have &lt;b>assloads of folks to carry them around&lt;/b>, the Thunderbolts and Spectres are still going to have to tread lightly when going in for the kill. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Is it just me, or does Chin</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2008 16:53:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Not everything goes the A-10's way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#20</link>
<description>The A-10 and the C-130 Spectre are truly awesome weapon systems. &#160;If I were an enemy tank brigade commander I would be crapping myself at the prospect of facing them. &#160;Or would I? &#160;Yes, it would suck...and yes, the cruise missiles have taken</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:02:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Not everything goes the A-10's way</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#19</link>
<description>The A-10 and the C-130 Spectre are truly awesome weapon systems. &#160;If I were an enemy tank brigade commander I would be crapping myself at the prospect of facing them. &#160;Or would I? &#160;Yes, it would suck...and yes, the cruise missiles have taken</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2008 10:52:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: I disagree.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#18</link>
<description>After the long period of underbudgeting for the effects of the war, every branch of the military is feeling severe shortages from equipment used up in Iraq.&lt;p>&#10;You seem to be counting the costs of the airplanes but not the submarines and ships. &#160;Like </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:26:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: The Army Wants YOU to join the US National Gua</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#17</link>
<description>When the US invaded Sicily during WWII, they folded almost as quickly as the French.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:06:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: I disagree.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#16</link>
<description>I think you're exactly right. The United States has no interest in holding foreign land, big oil usurpation of our army to continue the suppression of Iraqi crude not withstanding. Special Operations and projection of power through advanced, quick strike t</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:17:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: I disagree.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#15</link>
<description>Well this goes to the concept of marginal value. Does the extra utility of additional fighters in the air force to face a potential chinese threat provide greater bang for the buck than 2 more infantry divisions to face an active insurgent threat?&lt;p>&#10;When </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:54:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: I disagree.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#14</link>
<description>&lt;i> For my money I say tell the Air Force to take a hike on their multibillion fancy fighters and give the chinese borrowed funds to the army to have more armed boots on the ground when we start Operation Taipei Freedom in 2012. &#160;&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I kind of dis</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:56:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>3fingerspointback: Hey, give us back our stuff</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#13</link>
<description>It's not just the troops, either. &#160;Arnold Schwarzenegger just went to Washington to plead on the behalf of our &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20080225-1643-ca-schwarzenegger-washington.html">precious humvees and helic</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:38:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>stevetherobot: Re: suck it up</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#12</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>Its 2008. I mean seriously anyone who is in the guard at this date knew the score re: what they would be doing.&lt;/blockquote>&lt;br>&#10;I thought the point of the article was that people know the score and are not joining up.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:45:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Continuing from thefadd in SubQ and comments a</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#11</link>
<description>I probably would have given this a serious consideration when I was just out of high school.  I always had family in the Reserves so I knew that it wasn't "safe" even in the 90s (after all, Reserve units served in the Persian Gulf War and were also mobiliz</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:39:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Continuing from thefadd in SubQ and comments above</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#10</link>
<description>If they actually had a National Defense force that was only for regional/domestic emergencies, and would be deployed abroad for short deployments of a few months only in the event of an actual declared war or major national emergency (not some bullshit war</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:14:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: I disagree.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#9</link>
<description>I would call the way we used the reserves in the first few years of the Iraq conflict deceptive, since we recruited for a reserve force and then used it as an operational force. &#160;By now, very few people are left in the National Guard who haven't reenl</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:10:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: I disagree.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#8</link>
<description>Now we are cooking with gas -- or at least seeing eye to eye. If indeed we are using our 'reserves' as an operational force, then it makes sense to re-create the actual reserves..probably by expanding the number of army divisions that we actually use. &lt;p>&#10;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:57:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: suck it up</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#7</link>
<description>On one hand, I completely agree, that it's a little silly to join the military, even the reserves, and not expect to do military things. &#160;On the other hand, the reserves are sold as 'one weekend a month' and reservists are led to believe that their jo</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:54:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: I disagree.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#6</link>
<description>&lt;i> Since when has this meme been true? Certainly not since 9/11. And lets say that it were true, lets say its a big nasty surprise that people being paid to be "weekend warriors" get called upon to serve overseas for years. Isn't that part of the deal as </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:08:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>dzetetes: Re: The Army Wants YOU to join the US National Gua</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#5</link>
<description>&lt;em>don't want to go active duty and fight in some land war in Asia&lt;/em>&lt;p>&#10;At least they're not being made to go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:43:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: I disagree.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#4</link>
<description>&lt;i>&lt;br>&#10;Sure, you could theoretically get sent abroad, but deployments were supposedly shorter and usually only in times of national crisis (WWII, etc)&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Since when has this meme been true? Certainly not since 9/11. And lets say that it were true, let</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:42:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: I disagree.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#3</link>
<description>If we were talking about people in the regular army or reserves, then fine. I would be 100% behind that. Don't sign up if you can't handle the obligation, etc. &lt;p>&#10;But the article is directed at the National Guard. One of the reasons for serving in the gua</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:30:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: suck it up</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#2</link>
<description>Its 2008. I mean seriously anyone who is in the guard at this date knew the score re: what they would be doing. Its a volunteer force - &#160;of course when the job's suck quotient goes up it becomes harder to fill. &lt;p>&#10;You don't want members of your commu</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:20:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: The Army Wants YOU to join the US National Gua</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/23/16484/2062#1</link>
<description>Is the Pentagon smoking something? I was under the impression that the point of the National Guard was to defend the homeland, your own community, etc. That is why many people signed up, especially the types of people who really don't want to go active dut</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:59:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>