<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Did John McCain Come Out The Wrong Birth Canal? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000</link>
<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution">Article II, Clause 5 of the US Constitution&lt;/a> outlines these qualifications for the office of President of the US: &lt;i> "&lt;b>No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President&lt;/b>; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:51:28 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:41:23 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Did John McCain Come Out The Wrong Birth Canal</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#18</link>
<description>Not only that, but she looks like she could shoot laser beams out of her eyes.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:41:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>nmiguy: Re: Did John McCain Come Out The Wrong Birth Canal</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#17</link>
<description>Have you seen John McCain's wife? &#160;If he hasn't had a heart attack yet, he's probably got a strong heart. &#160;(His wife is pretty attractive for her age.)</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:19:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Did John McCain Come Out The Wrong Birth...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#16</link>
<description>&lt;i>A hell of a lot more worthy than the current idiot in office. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Sometimes I comfort myself by thinking that even if McCain wins this fall, he will still be a big step up from our current POTUS. &#160;Then I remember that my elderly cat would also </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2008 08:05:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Did John McCain Come Out The Wrong Birth...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#15</link>
<description>&lt;i> Is he worthy of running for President? &#160;Fuck yes! &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;A hell of a lot more worthy than the current idiot in office. If only he would have pulled it out in '00.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i> I don't share the enthusiasm that some people hold for pushing for Arnold Sc</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2008 07:29:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>3fingerspointback: ...file a challenge with the courts...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#14</link>
<description>They can try, but I doubt they'd succeed. &#160;In the 2004 San Diego mayoral election, Donna Frye jumped in as a write-in candidate after the primaries, and ended up getting enough votes in the election that a manual count was required, which took a few w</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2008 03:55:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: &quot;Natural born&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#13</link>
<description>It's clear enough now that McCain is eligible, but Obama's &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/02/29/obama_backs_law_to_ensure_mcca.html">proposed law&lt;/a> really makes a mishmash of the law. &#160;As you point out, the pre</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2008 18:36:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeeter1: Re: Did John McCain Come Out The Wrong Birth...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#12</link>
<description>I guess I don't care what the NYT thinks. &#160;That newspaper (their slogan, "America's newspaper of record") is turning into more of a rag all the time. &#160;They &lt;i>badly&lt;/i> need some new editors.&lt;p>&#10;Whatever you think of &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http:</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2008 13:02:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: &quot;Natural born&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#11</link>
<description>&lt;i>Clearly, the Fourteenth Amendment which makes everyone born in the US a "natural born citizen" does not make McCain a "natural born citizen",&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Actually the Fourteenth Amendment does not use the phrase "natural born citizen." &#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2008 06:57:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: &quot;Natural born&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#10</link>
<description>Enough with the Blackstone. &#160;Doesn't "natural born citizen" just mean that your birth alone makes you a citizen, with no further requirements? &#160;Clearly, the Fourteenth Amendment which makes everyone born in the US a "natural born citizen" does no</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:23:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tomc: Fear</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#9</link>
<description>&lt;i>no presidential candidate will ever raise this issue against an opponent for fear of looking like an asshole.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Candidates fear looking like assholes?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:23:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: NYT</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>I found the story intriguing from the standpoint that this is at least the second story in a week the Times has published which could have benefited with a bit more time on the top of some editor's desk rather than being run.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Yeah -- you've hit u</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:13:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Is John McCain A Natural Born Citizen?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#7</link>
<description>To answer the main question, yes, John McCain passes the natural born citizen test in my mind. &#160;I found the story intriguing from the standpoint that this is at least the second story in a week the Times has published which could have benefited with a</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:26:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Did John McCain Come Out The Wrong Birth Canal</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#6</link>
<description>&lt;i>Does making a big media circus out of this but having it turn out not to be a big deal at all, somehow soften things for Schwarzenegger, though?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I doubt it. I think the general understanding boils down to two principles: citizenship is inherited </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:03:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: &quot;Natural born&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#5</link>
<description>McCain &lt;i>is&lt;/i> "natural born," at least as the term was used in the 18th century. &#160;Back then the term referred more to your citizenship at birth rather than where you were born. The meaning of "natural born" as understood by the drafters of the Cons</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:44:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Did John McCain Come Out The Wrong Birth Canal</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#4</link>
<description>You are right, gerry. No presidential candidate will ever raise this against an opponent. But in the event of a loss to a potentially ineligible person, the aggrieved loser's party will simply file a challenge with the courts... after the election. This wi</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:30:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Did John McCain Come Out The Wrong Birth Canal</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#3</link>
<description>Does making a big media circus out of this but having it turn out not to be a big deal at all, somehow soften things for Schwarzenegger, though? Not I think he any longer has an actual chance at the Presidency.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:56:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Did John McCain Come Out The Wrong Birth Canal</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#2</link>
<description>&lt;i>Seem like a ridiculous problem?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Short answer: yes. Unless the concern is over naturalized citizenship, no presidential candidate will ever raise this issue against an opponent for fear of looking like an asshole. Because the issue will never be a</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:51:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Did John McCain Come Out The Wrong Birth Canal</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/28/14045/9000#1</link>
<description>And this is why Huckabee is still in the race. Well, that and the chance that a 70+ year old will have a heart attack during a given high stress 6 month period.&lt;p>&#10;Sorry I'm just cynical.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:31:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>