<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Trying To Combat Statutory Rape - This Time With Sexy Results. (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519</link>
<description>The Family Violence Partnership of Milwaukee, Wisconsin wants you to know that statutory rape is a bad thing. &#160;So, they've &lt;a href="http://www.adrants.com/2008/01/bulging-nubile-breasts-command-attention.php">begun running a print ad&lt;/a> to drive home that message. &#160;What they're trying to combat is the often-proffered excuse that "but she looked old enough." &#160;Their message is, even if she has the body, she might not be old enough to have sex. &#160;The part that's raising concerns is, in orde</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 03:36:04 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:06:38 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: consenting to sex</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#27</link>
<description>See my reply to thefadd.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:06:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: consenting to sex</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#26</link>
<description>There is also res ipsa loquitor [the thing speaks for itself] in law that can be applied in cases where it's clearly child molestation or rape of a child as opposed to statutory rape.&lt;p>&#10;In other words, I think that most everyone can agree that a child who</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:40:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: McLovin's address</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#25</link>
<description>"Momona" means "fat."</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:05:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: consenting to sex</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#24</link>
<description>&lt;i>There are children, and then there are adolescents who are under the age of consent. &#160;It is very hard to think of a situation where sex with a pre-adolescent child should be ok. &#160;In fact, I am all for that being illegal. &#160;&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;So I'm n</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:05:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: consenting to sex</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#23</link>
<description>While it is despicable for an adult to have sex with a teenager it is a whole other level over and above any other considerations for engaging in sexual relations with someone who is prepubescent. The fact is, once humans hit puberty, it's perfectly natura</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:14:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: consenting to sex</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#22</link>
<description>There are &lt;i>children&lt;/i>, and then there are adolescents who are under the age of consent. &#160;It is very hard to think of a situation where sex with a pre-adolescent child should be ok. &#160;In fact, I am all for that being illegal. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;However,</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:41:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Don't drink in NY then.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#21</link>
<description>&lt;i> Can somebody with some legal chops tell me what happens if a 16 year old who looks 20 comes on to you in a bar, and you take her home and sleep with her. &#160;Can you be prosecuted for statutory rape? &#160;What if you ask her age and she responds "21</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:34:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>delete me: Re: Creepiest ad campaign ever</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#20</link>
<description>Or just get all your dating done while you're still in elementary school.&lt;p>&#10;Not applicable for those who've been held back the last 7 years.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 03:09:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Creepiest ad campaign ever</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#19</link>
<description>If she's in a bar, asking to see ID won't do you much good, since even if she shows you a fake, you're still screwed according to the doctrine of "you shoulda known better." &#160;So I guess it's best not to go home with anyone you don't know from elementa</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 02:20:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Creepiest ad campaign ever</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#18</link>
<description>Yeah, I don't imagine anyone under 21 has ever managed to get into a bar.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:14:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Creepiest ad campaign ever</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#17</link>
<description>If she's in a bar, she ought to be at least 21. &#160;In fact, that's my cut-off age for sex, because she's going to have to go fetch a sixpack in the morning.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:56:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: You should not have been wearing those clothes</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#16</link>
<description>I dunno, there's still, "Let me drive you to the gun mart," cause that always opens up a rather wide range of options.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:41:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: You should not have been wearing those clothes</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#15</link>
<description>Wow. &#160;That sure doesn't leave much wiggle room does it?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:10:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>stevetherobot: Re: Most Excellent Word.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#14</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>Is it going to make someone pause and say (as you seem to be saying) "hey, I'd better have proof of age?"&lt;/blockquote>&lt;p>&#10;The impression I get is not that they are trying to encourage guys to make sure the girls they sleep with are old enough. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:03:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: consenting to sex</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#13</link>
<description>I see that you insist. So be it. Yes, you are basically right about our disagreement. Let me highlight your words to which I still take great exception:&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>Anyway in re: to favoring no legal sanctions whatsover against adults having sex with children of</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:02:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: consenting to sex</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#12</link>
<description>&lt;i>&lt;br>&#10;While we may have touched on this exact situation, our discussions have been on a different, broader aspect altogether. If you want me to dredge that up here, I will. Otherwise, I'll stay on topic. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Allow me. Here is a &lt;a href="http://www.tr</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:48:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ms sue: Re: Creepiest ad campaign ever</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#11</link>
<description>&lt;i>I hope ms. sue jumps in and explains why this is a good approach - I've had quite a few discussions with her on this very subject.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;While we may have touched on this exact situation, our discussions have been on a different, broader aspect altoget</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:27:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Degee: Re: Creepiest ad campaign ever</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#10</link>
<description>"does all that is in his power to ensure that she's 18 or over"&lt;p>&#10;Umm hey babe, before we head to my place, do you mind if we, umm swing by the cop shop?&lt;p>&#10;Huh? Why?&lt;p>&#10;Just need to run a background check, uh whats your social insurance number?&lt;p>&#10;Wow It</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:18:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Creepiest ad campaign ever</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#9</link>
<description>The fact that a man, with perfectly normal sexual urges, who meets a sexual mature girl in a bar, does all that is in his power to ensure that she's 18 or over, and then sleeps with her, could then end up in prison and labeled a sex offender for life strik</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:04:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Degee: Re: Most Excellent Word.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#8</link>
<description>"because pedophiles aren't interested in the least in adult sized body parts. "&lt;br>&#10;this is backed up by Humbert from Nabokov's Lolita:&lt;p>&#10;&lt;cite>For Humbert, a nymphet is in the earliest stages of puberty - "The bud-stage of breast development appears earl</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:08:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: Most Excellent Word.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#7</link>
<description>It strikes me as wrong on a different level than the photos in the print ad. &#160;I'm sure the geniuses who came up with those panties thought it was edgy, clever, and ironic. &#160;Worn on an adult, it might be all of that. &#160;Worn on a child and it's</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:05:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: What a bitch!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#6</link>
<description>Offtopic?! &#160;My ass! &#160;It's taken verbatim from the website of the Family Violence Partnership of Milwaukee...you know, the group mentioned in the very first sentence of the writeup?&lt;p>&#10;Is it really that bad? You must be overreacting.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:53:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Most Excellent Word.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#5</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>As a person who voted for the number three statement in the poll, queasy just doesn't quite explain how I felt when I saw those photos&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>How does &lt;a href="http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2007/12/11/i-want-ones-that-say-who-needs-p</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:49:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Most Excellent Word.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#4</link>
<description>And they laughed when Kathy Bates uttered the word "oogy" in &lt;i>Misery&lt;/i>. &#160;As a person who voted for the number three statement in the poll, queasy just doesn't quite explain how I felt when I saw those photos. &#160;I'm looking at the faces of ten </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:20:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: Creepiest ad campaign ever</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#3</link>
<description>&lt;i>&lt;br>&#10;.&lt;p>&#10;Can somebody with some legal chops tell me what happens if a 16 year old who looks 20 comes on to you in a bar, and you take her home and sleep with her. &#160;Can you be prosecuted for statutory rape? &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Yes.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>&lt;br>&#10;What if you ask h</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:17:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: You should not have been wearing those clothes</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#2</link>
<description>Helpful hints about what &lt;a href="http://www.timetospeakup.org/not_to_say.htm">not to say&lt;/a>:&lt;p>&#10;&#160; &#160; * &#160;What a big jerk! What a bitch!&lt;br>&#10;&#160; &#160; * At least they care enough to get jealous.&lt;br>&#10;&#160; &#160; * That happened a long ti</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:43:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Creepiest ad campaign ever</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/101930/2519#1</link>
<description>I think what's making us all feel oogy is that we've never actually seen anyone who looks like that in real life. &#160;Typically if a girl is sexually mature at a younger age and looks older than she is, all of her looks older. &#160;I've never personally</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:31:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>