<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>The following takes place between 12am and 11pm, on the day of the California presidential primary. (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914</link>
<description>Super Tuesday is here, and &lt;a href="http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-02-05-voa1.cfm">California, along with most of the country&lt;/a> is up for grabs!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:52:29 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:35:46 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#51</link>
<description>I got no dog in that hunt. &#160;So far so good. &#160;I don't think regional or local entities can do the things that the FAA, CDC or FDA or USDA does, though. &#160;Not to mention the National Parks and Forests, NOAA and the FDIC. &#160;The list goes on.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:35:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MC Nally: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#50</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>Can he be his own man? Does he have anything he really stands for?&lt;/blockquote>Do you mean does he have anything he really stands for &lt;b>apart&lt;/b> from the unwavering belief that John McCain should be president? &#160;Because he's a real rock o</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:56:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#49</link>
<description>But the 10th Amendment you don't like?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:28:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#48</link>
<description>Hey, I'm all for gun ownership. &#160;I'd be a hypocrite if I felt otherwise. &#160;If the FBI spent as much time on illegal firearm trafficking as they did entrapping people for as yet uncommitted terrorism crimes, I'd be all the happier.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:14:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#47</link>
<description>Perhaps I've mentioned one of my definitions of a "liberal": an American who loves the Bill of Rights, except for the 2nd and 10th Amendments.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:12:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#46</link>
<description>you mean, they're strict constructionists? ;-)</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:59:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#45</link>
<description>There was a period in 2000 were McCain was cast as an Arizona "Western Republican" without much concern for the moral intrusions of the religious right. Combine that with the standard fiscal conservative that came with all Republicans pre-Bush II and "stra</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:56:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#44</link>
<description>If you would take the time to listen to them, you'd find that a lot of libertarians aren't necessarily against the government, for example, providing education. They merely think that the &lt;i>federal&lt;/i> government has no business doing it. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:32:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#43</link>
<description>No, I pay, you pay, we all pay for the things that &lt;i>we&lt;/i> need, that no single person has the resources to provide for themselves or anyone else. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;I do not have the time to fix my little section of the street, maintain my little section of the </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:05:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#42</link>
<description>I appreciate your clarification.&lt;p>&#10;The trouble with 'strict constructionism', for lack of a better term, is that I fail to see why it's attractive, except as a justification to ignore &lt;i>stare decisis&lt;/i> in cases that you don't agree with. &#160;In my vi</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:56:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Jackkeefe: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#41</link>
<description>&lt;i> He ws the firebrand libertarian candidate in '00 &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;When has Mr. Campaign Finance Reform ever been a libertarian? On any issue? &#160;To my mind, McCain is fairly comfortable, and has always been comfortable, using the federal government's &#160;r</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:57:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#40</link>
<description>I said Paul was a strict constructionist who is in favor of devolving federal powers. &#160;I did not say that all strict constructionists are so in favor, nor did I claim that the desire to devolve federal powers to the states is a defining characteristic</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:40:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#39</link>
<description>And I quote:&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>I think it's a sign of the times when a strict constructionist who is strongly in favor of devolving federal power to the states is seen as extreme.&lt;/i></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:04:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#38</link>
<description>Obama, to some degree, McCain to a lesser degree, Clinton I have my doubts about.&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;Surfing topics, we were discussing McCain a little bit in the chat last night and I just don't know where the guy really stands on stuff anymore. He was the firebrand l</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:00:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#37</link>
<description>This is exactly why I think Paul or some libertarian candidate would be a good choice at this time. Some of his more eccentric ideas would get shot down by congress, and most of his more reasonable suggestions would be approved. Even if congress is 100% ag</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:41:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#36</link>
<description>Eh, he only gets to be President for four years. I think everyone left and right agrees that after the largest expansion of the federal government in its history under Bush, the thing needs a hacksaw, not pruning shears. It's not like he's going to have ei</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:32:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#35</link>
<description>&lt;i>It's up to the Democrats whom the Democrats nominate, and it's up to the Republicans whom the Republicans nominate.  It is their party, not yours.&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;I see your point, but given the fact that we have an institutionalized two party system (I think</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:26:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>novy: Re: Exit polling</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#34</link>
<description>Obama won Rocky Mountains, midwest, southeast, small states in northeast. Clinton won Latins and Asians (thus California, Arizona, and maybe New Mexico), Arkansas and states near Arkansas, and big states in northeast. They came so close to splitting delega</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:23:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#33</link>
<description>It's up to the Democrats whom the Democrats nominate, and it's up to the Republicans whom the Republicans nominate. &#160;It is their party, not yours. &#160;Now, if they are nice, they can invite you to play with them (as some states do), but requiring th</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:52:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#32</link>
<description>I don't know how Delaware election law works, but in New Jersey you can be a "registered Independent" as well as "registered voter without party affiliation." It's probably easy to get confused when one fills out the form.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:42:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#31</link>
<description>No - that's why I specifically wrote independent with a lowercase "i".  I know (at least, hope) you're being semi-facetious, but I taught an intro to American Government class, and it was pretty sad how many students (at least a third of the class, maybe m</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:34:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#30</link>
<description>&lt;i>"not allowed to stick my nose in other people's business?"&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;Haha, very funny.  This might be a valid complaint, if it weren't for the fact that a large number of states do have open primaries (or they allow you to declare your party on the day </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:29:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#29</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Delaware doesn't allow registered independents to vote in primaries&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Can't you vote in the primary of the &lt;a href="http://www.independentpartyofdelaware.org/">Independent Party&lt;/a>?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:33:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#28</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I don't want to have to pay for every damn thing...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Can't &lt;i>someone else&lt;/i> pay for the things &lt;i>I&lt;/i> need?!</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:23:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#27</link>
<description>Huh, did I say that a strict constructionist is one who favors devolution of federal powers? &#160;Nope.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:21:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: I got disenfranchised.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#26</link>
<description>As a New York voter I wanted to go for Gravel. Sure, if Obama wins I'll probably vote for him in the end (depending on who else runs), but at this point I wanted my opinion registered that the Democratic party has not done its job in providing oversight an</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:52:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Dude... Wait, what?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#25</link>
<description>&lt;i> Is he actually racist? &#160;Maybe not exactly - but he certainly had no problems associating himself with racists. &#160;I don't buy the excuse that sometimes the enemy of my enemy is my friend - you can't make those kind of alliances, even when you'r</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:44:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#24</link>
<description>&lt;i>I didn't vote today because I couldn't. Delaware doesn't allow registered independents to vote in primaries.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;So, by "disenfranchised," you mean, "not allowed to stick my nose in other people's business?"</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:41:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Labels</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#23</link>
<description>&lt;i>A strict constructionist is someone who favors the prosecution in criminal cases, and the defendant in civil cases, and adheres to the theory of the 'constitution in exile'.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Aside from Rehnquist's throwaway comment from a memo he wrote in his you</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:38:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#22</link>
<description>Well, to be technical I doubt you'd see the USPS dissolved under a hypothetical Paul administration since it is authorized by Article 1, Section 8 of the &lt;a href="http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html">Constitution.&lt;/a>&lt;p>&#10;Also, I think it is unlikely t</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:17:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#21</link>
<description>Racist, schmacist. &#160;I like government employees like postmen, cops and firefighters. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;I don't want to live in a Libertarian wonderland. &#160;I have a job, and I don't wanna fix the potholes on my street. &#160;I don't want to have to generat</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 02:22:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#20</link>
<description>Sorry, but a 'strict constructionist' is not someone who favors devolution of federal power. &#160;A strict constructionist is someone who favors the prosecution in criminal cases, and the defendant in civil cases, and adheres to the theory of the 'constit</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 02:14:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Mitt Romney's speech</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#19</link>
<description>And the one's who are unhappy with Bush are voting McCain who most of the left is the most likely to be Bush III. There's no 'splainin' Republicans;-)</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 02:01:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Down To The Wire</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#18</link>
<description>at least on the Democratic side. California polls just closed as I write this, but it doesn't seem this is going to make any difference even tomorrow. The wins seem very scattershot, with some obvious results (Clinton in NY/NJ, Obama in Georgia) mixed with</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:09:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Jackkeefe: Re: Exit polling</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#17</link>
<description>According to the exit polls I've seen, Obama won AZ, MA, NJ and MO. &#160;As of now, it appears that he lost most of those states rather handily. &#160;Throw NH into the mix and it appears that there is a significant trend developing. &#160;I'm not aware o</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:26:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>uncarved block: Fluke Discovery</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#16</link>
<description>&#160; &#160; &lt;i>Reason&lt;/i> magazine apparently did a little digging, and came up with a &lt;a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/124426.html">theory&lt;/a> that Lew Rockwell and Murray Rothbard were likely the authors of the worst content in those newsletter</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:23:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Mitt Romney's speech</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#15</link>
<description>Just watched it. &#160;Mitt said that if "Washington" continues on its current course, America will become a "second tier" power. &#160;That's a striking statement from him; exit polls show that he gets the majority of voters who are happy with Bush. &amp;nbsp</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:39:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#14</link>
<description>I think it's a sign of the times when a strict constructionist who is strongly in favor of devolving federal power to the states is seen as extreme. &#160;I think most of the founding fathers would have been quite comfortable with Ron Paul's positions. &amp;nb</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:18:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#13</link>
<description>I voted for McCain today as well, and I've come to the same conclusion you have regarding the general election.&lt;p>&#10;If it's McCain against Hillary I'll vote for McCain - if McCain v Obama, I will probably vote Obama. &#160;I can't imagine we are the only tw</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:14:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: But Think of the Children!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#12</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Why is it that when Hillary Rodham Clinton tells us her vision of the important things for the federal government to accomplish we simply don't believe her?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>&lt;a href="http://www.thebluesite.com/archives/000527.html">Why indeed</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:07:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Huckabee wins WV, Romney Caucus-blocked!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#11</link>
<description>Correction: &lt;a href="http://ronpaul2008.typepad.com/ron_paul_2008/2008/02/ron-paul-secure.html">Paul supporters swung their WV support to Huckabee in exchange for 3 national delegates.&lt;/a>&lt;p>&#10;A deal with the devil perhaps.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:03:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: A few good webpages...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#10</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/">CNN's page w/Super Tuesday results &amp; delegate counts&lt;/a>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/election/2008/dashboard/">Yahoo's 2008 Presidential Race Dashboard&lt;/a> - has lots of poll results, plus delegate c</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:56:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#9</link>
<description>I'm sort of the inverse of you on this one. I don't care if he's *actually* a racist...only if he's *effectively* a racist. His views are "extreme" on all counts. For that reason very few of them will see the light of day in Washington. But that's exactly </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:19:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: But Think of the Children!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#8</link>
<description>While flipping channels, I happened to catch Hillary speaking to the &lt;a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3307867.ece">Yale Child Study Center&lt;/a>, and when she talked about how children had always been h</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:38:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Invitation to chat &amp; watch the results come in</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#7</link>
<description>Anyone who wants realtime chat about the results is welcome to join us in the &lt;a href="http://chat.treesandthings.com">TnT Chat Room&lt;/a>. &#160;We'll be there all night.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:33:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#6</link>
<description>Is he actually racist? &#160;Maybe not exactly - but he certainly had no problems associating himself with racists. &#160;I don't buy the excuse that sometimes the enemy of my enemy is my friend - you can't make those kind of alliances, even when you're de</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:52:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#5</link>
<description>I just don't buy the Ron Paul racist meme, not even for a nickle. There's nothing in his political record or platform to suggest that he's got some hidden racially motivated agenda. Which one is the conspiracy theory again?</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:43:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#4</link>
<description>As a registered Republican, I'll be voting for McCain as soon as I get to the polling place. &#160;Actually, I'm thinking about voting for Obama come the general election. &#160;If Hillary heads the Democratic ticket, I'll have to stick with McCain. &#160;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:23:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#3</link>
<description>&lt;i> If I could have voted, I probably would have voted for McCain to help make sure he wins the Republican nomination, as he's the only R candidate that I can stomach (sorry pO157, but as much as I agree with some of Ron Paul's policies, I have problems vo</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:40:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Disenfranchised in Delaware...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#2</link>
<description>I didn't vote today because I couldn't.  Delaware doesn't allow registered independents to vote in primaries.  If I could have voted, I probably would have voted for McCain to help make sure he wins the Republican nomination, as he's the only R candidate t</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:05:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Huckabee wins WV, Romney Caucus-blocked!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/2/5/10542/34914#1</link>
<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed4/idUSN0156807620080205">Paulites and McCain supporters defect en masse after 2 rounds&lt;/a> of ballotting to barely keep the state from falling into Romney's hands. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:59:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>