<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Browser Wars (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104</link>
<description>If you're here, you're using a browser of one flavor or another.
&lt;P>
My latest computer came with Windows Vista and Internet Explorer 7 pre-installed. &#160;It would crash on me every couple of hours.&lt;p>
I'm running on &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=23077">Mozilla Firefox 3 beta&lt;/a>, and am much happier with it. &#160;Even in beta, it's faster and more stable than IE7.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:05:16 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:49:59 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>eduardo: Opera...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#27</link>
<description>I first encountered Opera on a 300 year old PC in my undergrad library. It was the worst browser ever, it made no sense to me and looked like shit. I literally hated it.&lt;p>&#10;A few years later, I heard a lot of noise about Opera making their browser free. I </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:49:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>eduardo: Re: Browsers I've known</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#26</link>
<description>&lt;i>I suspect it uses RIM servers as a proxy, and haven't gotten around to seeing if this is truly the case.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Something like that is probably going on. I recently got a replacement blackberry and noticed that the browser history carried over from my o</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:25:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: peed / compatabillygoat</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#25</link>
<description>What do you consider "serious"?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:13:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Speed / compatibility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#24</link>
<description>&lt;i> And yet, forums like this one are littered with complaints about Firefox 2 being slow or bloated.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Then maybe there's something to it? &#160;Something not quantifiable? &#160;I don't know what it is, but it's just my impression and it's been my i</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:06:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: peed / compatabillygoat</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#23</link>
<description>I'm saying that Firefox has much less severe memory leaks than its competitors, and that every version of Firefox has had fewer leaks than its predecessor. &#160;If you have a workload that leaks, please post it on Bugzilla where I'm sure people will be ex</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:14:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: peed / compatabillygoat</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#22</link>
<description>I really don't have a goat in this fight...but it looks like a lot of links in your google search are from 2005 - 2006. &#160;Not that it really matters...just sayin'.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:51:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Browser Wars</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#21</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>What am I missing?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>You're missing ActiveX applications. Not a big deal unless you work for a company that uses one.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:40:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: peed / compatabillygoat</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#20</link>
<description>Do you think that Firefox &lt;i>does not&lt;/i> have a memory leak problem?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:38:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: Browser Wars</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#19</link>
<description>What am I missing?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:26:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: peed / compatabillygoat</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#18</link>
<description>Half a million opinions of the know-nothings doesn't amount to truth.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=elvis+ufo">http://www.google.com/search?q=elvis+ufo&lt;/a></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:26:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Browser Wars</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#17</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>On Windows: Firefox 3...is there a reason to use anything else?&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>ActiveX.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:58:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: peed / compatabillygoat</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#16</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>...weird anecdotes about Firefox performance that are utterly contradicted by all available scientific evidence&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>"Scientific evidence"? How many &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&amp;hl=en&amp;rlz=</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:56:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: Browser Wars</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#15</link>
<description>On Linux: Firefox 3. &#160;On Windows: Firefox 3. &#160;On Mac: Firefox 3. &#160;Is there a reason to use anything else?&lt;p>&#10;There are lots of browsers out there but there's only one &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.getfirebug.com/">Firebug&lt;/a>. &#160;Lik</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:19:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: Speed / compatibility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#14</link>
<description>This is a really interesting and also frustrating comment for me, because you are one of those people who throw out weird anecdotes about Firefox performance that are utterly contradicted by all available scientific evidence. &#160;Every major release of F</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:04:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>delete me: Re: Browsers I've known</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#13</link>
<description>Never used emacs for web browsing. Heck, I didn't use emacs very much at all; I used vi.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:26:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Browsers I've known</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#12</link>
<description>What about emacs?</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:07:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Wars?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#11</link>
<description>Do we even have browser wars anymore? &#160;I know that term was bandied about quite a bit when Netscape and IE were at each other's throats. &#160;Now browser use seems to fall into two categories...those folks who are tech savvy or have a tech savvy frie</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:49:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Speed / compatibility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#10</link>
<description>I gotta agree on the tabs thing. &#160;It's made work so much easier, particularly when I am using multiple databases that are running off various websites. &lt;p>&#10;I haven't tried Opera. &#160;I've been using Firefox for a few years now. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:16:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Bit of Trivia</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#9</link>
<description>It's obviously been outclassed by all the portable stuff since but the browser on psp was pretty sweet for when it came out.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:51:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>delete me: Re: Bit of Trivia</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#8</link>
<description>Aww, crap. I forgot to list the browsers I've used on the Dreamcast, Wii, PSP, and PS3. Ah, well.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:09:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: No one cares what browsers I use</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#7</link>
<description>On Windows: Firefox, IE, Opera, Safari.&lt;p>&#10;On Linux: Firefox, Opera*, and Konqueror.&lt;p>&#10;But never mind that. I have a product recommendation: The &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.piclens.com/site/firefox/win/">PicLens browser plugin&lt;/a> must be seen to b</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:42:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Browsers I've known</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#6</link>
<description>Hardly a clone - they removed all the suckiness of Konqueror's UI.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:04:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Bit of Trivia</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#5</link>
<description>The Wii internet browser is opera powered.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:24:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: TnT Browser Stats</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#4</link>
<description>By the way, here's a link to the website stats page which has browser info: &lt;p>&#10;&#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.treesandthings.com/stats/usage_200802.html#TOPAGENTS">http://www.treesandthings.com/stats/usage_200802.html#TOPAGENTS&lt;/a>&lt;p>&#10;According </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:17:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Speed / compatibility</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#3</link>
<description>To me it's always been about two things - speed and compatibility. &#160;Back when I first got online I used Netscape (ver. 3, I think) because it was, at the time, the best of both worlds. IE 3 just didn't cut it in many areas, although it was somewhat fa</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:12:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Browsers I've known</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#2</link>
<description>Actually, Safari is a &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://dot.kde.org/1041971213/">Konqueror&lt;/a> clone.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:57:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>delete me: Browsers I've known</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/16/63613/1104#1</link>
<description>IBM Web Explorer (OS/2 Warp) - Probably the worst, and most primitive graphical browser I have ever used. Slightly better than downloading every webpage and using a text editor to browse them with.&lt;p>&#10;Mosaic (Windows) - Used this for a short bit, and decid</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:34:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>