<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to Hate (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939</link>
<description>Like it or not, &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://reviews.cnet.com/windows/windows-vista-ultimate/4505-3672_7-32013603.html">Windows Vista&lt;/a> is on the horizon for many, and they're not all happy about it. &#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.hunterstrat.com/news/category/obsolescence/">Windows XP&lt;/a> has a limited time left. &#160;XP has some life in it for a while, but it's &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gizmosforgeeks.com/2008/03/25/windows-xp-nears-the-end/">headed for oblivion&lt;/a>.&lt;p>
I've been </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:02:11 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:45:49 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>DEMachina: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#63</link>
<description>That's true, but I've been good about that aspect at least (knock on wood). &#160;I'll just have to wait and see what's available when I'm in the market, I guess.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:45:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#62</link>
<description>Yeah, but can you spill a cup of coffee on a Macbook's keyboard?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Apr 2008 21:31:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DEMachina: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#61</link>
<description>Oh yeah, I have seen those around. &#160;It looks like it (&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://reviews.cnet.com/laptops/panasonic-toughbook-cf-52/4505-3121_7-32476019.html">this model&lt;/a>, anyway) got decent reviews, but it's even more expensive than a MBP. &amp;nb</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:25:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#60</link>
<description>If you're prone to dropping your laptop, you should look into the Panasonic Lifebooks. &#160;Spill-proof keyboard, shock resistant HD, very nice display. &#160;Not cheap, and the battery life leaves something to be desired, but I was &lt;strong>that&lt;/strong> </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:38:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DEMachina: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#59</link>
<description>On that I wholeheartedly agree: easily the majority of our service requests are "my computer runs too slow." &#160;And it's painful to see computer literally new out of the box that take 5 minutes to boot. &#160;Msconfig is your friend....&lt;p>&#10;I appreciate </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Apr 2008 21:10:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>stevetherobot: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#58</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>WGA still does occasionally phone home at random times. There's no way to "opt out" of this by simply not running the update program&lt;/blockquote>&lt;p>&#10;One way to opt out would be to install ZoneAlarm firewall and when it asks if WGA can access th</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:19:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>stevetherobot: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#57</link>
<description>You can get a bunch of Unix utilities that have been ported to Windows, including split, gzip and gunzip. &#160;I've been using them for years on Win98, Win2K and WinXP. &#160;I haven't tried them on Vista yet though.&lt;p>&#10;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://unxu</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:16:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#56</link>
<description>I wonder if that's because HP sells a lot of machines, though. &#160;It stands to reason that the top sellers == more support calls due to sheer numbers.&lt;p>&#10;I am not completely rah-rah about HP, however. &#160;I spent a considerable amount of time ripping </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:58:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#55</link>
<description>I think the Lenovo ThinkPads come pretty highly rated, and you can pick up a decent one for the price range you describe.&lt;br>&#10;I didn't get one because I wanted a 17" screen, and I didn't see any that fit the bill, but I did a lot of comparisons, as my comp</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:22:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DEMachina: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#54</link>
<description>That's interesting, because I've seen more problems from HPs than any other brand (except Toshiba) at our help desk. &#160;Dells definitely aren't what they used to be, that's for sure.&lt;p>&#10;I'll probably need a new laptop sometime in the next year or so; as</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:00:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Blah, blah, blah...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#53</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>For example, they claim that the Hardware Functionality Scan will not impair the ability of the open-source community to write drivers. &#160;Microsoft's white paper on the subject contradicts this, saying that GPU functionality is used in H</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:44:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeeter1: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#52</link>
<description>&lt;i>"I think her mistake was getting a Dell, as they suck horribly nowadays. &#160;I used to be a loyal Dell customer, then they started sucking. &#160;I just got an HP about 6 months ago, and it's awesome."&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;No disagreement, here. &#160;My last Dell </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:02:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#51</link>
<description>My machine has 2GB of memory and a 1.8 GHz AMD Turion, and it's plenty fast. &#160;I think her mistake was getting a Dell, as they suck horribly nowadays. &#160;I used to be a loyal Dell customer, then they started sucking. &#160;I just got an HP about 6 m</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:13:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#50</link>
<description>My 2GB laptop handles Vista just fine - certainly no faster than XP on the same machine (it was purchased with XP), but not noticeably slower.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:31:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DEMachina: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#49</link>
<description>It's got 2GB on there already. &#160;That's sorta my point: 2GB is plenty for an XP machine, but it's a &lt;i>minimum&lt;/i> for Vista; ergo slower performance. &#160;And I know that's how it goes, but when that performance hit comes without any real gain, it's </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:18:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#48</link>
<description>" My gf has a high-end Dell laptop (designed to be a gaming machine) which runs Vista and is sloooowww. &#160;And I've done all those things you're supposed to do to keep it running quickly (spyware, defrag, etc.)."&lt;p>&#10;Did you add memory? &#160;2GB minimum</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:06:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DEMachina: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#47</link>
<description>I work in tech support for my school, so have to deal with it pretty regularly. &#160;We see a lot more things going wrong with Vista than with XP machines. &#160;Plus we switched the computer at our desk from XP to Vista last summer and its performance pr</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:23:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#46</link>
<description>&lt;i>People hate Vista because it sucks, pure and simple. &#160;I for one will never use it. &#160;I'll switch full-time to OS X or Linux before I use Vista.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;If you will never use it, because it sucks, so you don't use it, isn't that a bit like a nun </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:24:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: porn server bonus</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#45</link>
<description>My boss said, "The worst thing was that it was gay porn, so there wasn't anything there I wanted."</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:55:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Pravda: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#44</link>
<description>&lt;i>and told them about my boss's computer that was used as a porn server without his knowledge&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Seems to me that many kids would see this as an advantage.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:49:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DEMachina: Re: Ha Ha</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#43</link>
<description>Did you actually read MS's supposed technical response (which in reality is PR)?&lt;p>&#10;Gutmann &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html#response">addresses it&lt;/a> after his paper, and another &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="h</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:27:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#42</link>
<description>I've never really had a need to split files any time in the last 10 years, but from my Vista system:&lt;p>&#10;joshv@Newton ~&lt;br>&#10;$ which split&lt;br>&#10;/usr/bin/split</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:18:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Windows is that reliable</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#41</link>
<description>" VMS on a DEC Alpha cluster could do that. &#160;Windows never could. "&lt;p>&#10;That's just plain wrong. &#160; I work with Windows based servers that have uptimes in the year+ range all the time. &#160;Take any of the NT based OSes, install them on server gra</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:14:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: corrupted memory</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#40</link>
<description>Yeah, well programs that eat up all the memory are not the fault of the OS. &#160;Windows task manager provides a way for you to find these programs and kill them - try that the next time you think you need to reboot.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:07:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Ha Ha</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#39</link>
<description>It wasn't my intent to take a side on the Ou vs. Guttman argument - Ou's blog post just happened to be the first thing I ran across when doing a search on the topic. I could have picked ay number of other pages that said basically the same thing as Ou, so </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:06:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: corrupted memory</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#38</link>
<description>Well, I get a pop-up that says the memory cache is too small and that a swap file is being opened. &#160;Or else the system just starts running slow, so I reboot and it's back up to snuff.&lt;p>&#10;Releasing memory was always a problem with older versions of Win</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:18:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: Ha Ha</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#37</link>
<description>Well, I hate to rebut an &lt;i>ad hominem&lt;/i> attack with another one, but George Ou has been Daring Fireball's Jackass of the Week &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=george+ou+%2Bsite%3Adaringfireball.net">a dozen times or so.&lt;/a> &#160;H</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:27:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DEMachina: Re: Ha Ha</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#36</link>
<description>That "through debunking" you mentioned was done without actually seeing what Gutmann did. &#160;Gutmann responded to Ou's (and another ZDNet blogger's) claims &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cypherpunks.to/~peter/zdnet.html">here&lt;/a>.&lt;p>&#10;Ou's post reall</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:18:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Windows is that reliable</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#35</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I think a lot of people have dodgy hardware but don't realize it&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>That, and Norton Antivirus.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:51:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: Windows is that reliable</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#34</link>
<description>I think a lot of people have dodgy hardware but don't realize it. &#160;Their computers crash and they blame it on Windows (or Linux). &#160;The real problem is they or Dell saved a nickel by using a power supply that isn't quite up to the task, or 1/2" of</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:45:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Windows is that reliable</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#33</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Windows never could&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I haven't tried with Vista (mostly because my only Vista install is on a laptop that gets turned on and off a lot), but a Windows 2000 box will run for a year without a reboot. (Except for reboots required</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:28:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeeter1: Re: Windows is that reliable</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#32</link>
<description>&lt;i>"I have the bad habit of leaving my XP machine running overnight, because I am too stupidly impatient to wait for it to boot. &#160;I'd say four days is the limit."&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;That's been pretty much my experience with both XP and Vista as well. &#160;No it</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:10:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Windows is that reliable</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#31</link>
<description>I am not sure what "uncorrupted memory" is, but if you have programs that are consuming large amounts of memory and not releasing them, then closing the program or killing it with task manager will free up the memory. &#160;If it doesn't work, there is sti</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:29:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Ha Ha</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#30</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I for one will never use it....Further, Vista refuses to play "premium" content (which is anything 800x600 or above) if you don't have movie-studio-approved hardware...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>How do you know that Vista won't play premium content if</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:57:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DEMachina: there's a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#29</link>
<description>People hate Vista because it sucks, pure and simple. &#160;I for one will never use it. &#160;I'll switch full-time to OS X or Linux before I use Vista. &#160;I'm alright with XP, and will think about upgrading to Windows 7 when that comes out if it doesn'</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:26:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#28</link>
<description>You use the word "explanation" in relation to Windows support, therefore I surmise that you have never had to deal with these people. &#160;They are barely above the level of an Eliza program. &#160;The furthest I've ever got with them (it's like a game, e</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:20:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#27</link>
<description>&lt;i>If you didn't like the previous release 7.10, you're not going to like 8.04, either. It looks identical.  Perhaps one of the themes from http://art.gnome.org/ would suit you more?&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;I am using a different theme (the Gnome bluecurve theme instead</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:05:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#26</link>
<description>&lt;i>My biggest gripe is Ubuntu's default look and feel - it's ugly as hell, although I've read that they're putting some effort into making the next release better looking.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;If you didn't like the previous release 7.10, you're not going to like 8.04, </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:56:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#25</link>
<description>You'd want to split a large file into parts so that the individual parts might fit on a CD or DVD or into some other finite space, or because your email provider has a limit on attachment size, or for a variety of other reasons.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:47:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Windows is that reliable</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#24</link>
<description>&lt;i>Windows would stay up for years at a time&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I have the bad habit of leaving my XP machine running overnight, because I am too stupidly impatient to wait for it to boot. &#160;I'd say four days is the limit. &#160;After I play with graphics editors,</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:30:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#23</link>
<description>I regularly uninstall Norton on my friends' computers, however, I then install NOD32. &#160;The speed gain remains. &#160;Norton is simply a pig. &#160;I have had no problems with NOD32, and it occasionally turns up a virus attachment, so I assume it's wor</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:19:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#22</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>To do any ordinary file operation, like split a large file into parts...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>In what way is that "ordinary"? Why would you ever want (let alone need) to split a large file into parts?&lt;p>&#10;&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Windows is a platform that </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 11:38:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#21</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>64-bit Ubuntu seems stable enough for me - though Wine is almost totally unusable&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>I run Wine on 64-bit Mepis, and it works great. I run Photoshop, Raw Shooter, and MS Office 2003 with little or no loss of functionality.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 11:27:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#20</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>I've been running on Ubuntu since last November and I'm generally happy with how things are working. My biggest gripe is Ubuntu's default look and feel - it's ugly as hell, although I've read that they're putting some effort into making the </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 11:19:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#19</link>
<description>I said that windows doesn't phone home every day. &#160;And it doesn't. &#160;Apparently it once did in 2006. &#160;I installed Vista in 2007.&lt;p>&#10;I am aware of the fact that there have been issues with WGA. &#160;The vast majority of folks though have no p</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:49:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#18</link>
<description>64-bit Ubuntu seems stable enough for me - though Wine is almost totally unusable. &#160;As my Linux server is semi-experimental I justed wanted to kick the tires on a 64-bit OS, and perhaps do something crazy like install 8GB of RAM and actually be able t</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:33:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#17</link>
<description>For those kinds of users, sure. &#160;But add a digital camera into the mix. &#160;Add an iPod or other MP3 player. &#160;Gah. &#160;I realize that malware infestation can be a serious issue with XP, but I've managed to teach my family how to avoid them wi</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:24:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Free software</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#16</link>
<description>&lt;i>much more of the software for windows is commercial, but this also means it's higher quality&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Closed-source software is not always made with the user's best interests at heart. &#160;They try to lock you into proprietary formats, which can screw y</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:54:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#15</link>
<description>&lt;i>I am posting this from IE6 running under Ubuntu, using Wine.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;&lt;b>WHY?&lt;/b> &#160;&lt;p>&#10;Ubuntu 64-bit has lots of problems. &#160;Unless you have a really compelling reason to run 64 bit, like some crucial piece of software that requires it, you shoul</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:20:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#14</link>
<description>Well, &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513-6081286.html">you &lt;i>were&lt;/i> wrong&lt;/a>:&#13;&#10;&lt;blockquote>&#13;&#10;&lt;i>Microsoft's antipiracy tool phones home daily&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;By Joris Evers, News.com&#13;&#10;Posted on ZDNet News: Jun 8, 2006 12:25:00 AM&#13;&#10;Microsoft </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:06:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#13</link>
<description>&lt;i> For the average user, it will just be more frustration than it's worth once they want to do anything more than surf and read email.&lt;/i>.&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;If they just want to surf, read e-mail, and play solitaire, though, Ubuntu is an excellent solution.  I do hi</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 07:46:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#12</link>
<description>&lt;i> 7-zip has been around for awhile, and it's awesome.&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;This is very true - that's one big beef I have with Linux (or with OSS developers, I guess - it's not really the Linux developer's fault) - there are a number of open source programs for Win</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 07:39:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#11</link>
<description>I've been using "shady" freeware zip packages for quite some time on windows with no problems. &#160;7-zip has been around for awhile, and it's awesome. &#160;And then of course there's winzip, but I stopped using that only recently when it turned into a h</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:15:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#10</link>
<description>What explanation did Windows support give you for this? &#160;I purchased an upgrade version of Vista, and installed it over XP. &#160;All it did was ask me for my original XP key, which was legit as well, and it worked like a charm. &#160; &#160;Was your </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:43:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#9</link>
<description>I think this is a matter of perspective. &#160;My primary OS is Linux, and has been since 1995. &#160;Every time I use Windows I am amazed at what a software ghetto it is. &#160;Windows doesn't have the bare, basic functions that Unix descendants have had </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:43:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>If you purchase a legal copy, you will be able to run it.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Ha! &#160;Says you. &#160;I skipped Windows XP so when I bought (as in paid full retail price) for Windows Vista Home Basic, I upgraded directly from Windows 2000 Professional. &#160;Alleg</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:34:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#7</link>
<description>"Which is all well and good, until it's not all well and then you're screwed. If I buy and pay for something, it should always work - it shouldn't "phone home" every day. I bought Windows, I'm not leasing it (although I guess that's the model MS is moving </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:10:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#6</link>
<description>&lt;i>As for Window restrictions, I really don't understand what's bothering you.  If you purchase a legal copy, you will be able to run it.  There are some folks who run into problems (this is rare though) - they call Microsoft and then all is well.&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:51:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#5</link>
<description>I am posting this from IE6 running under Ubuntu, using Wine. &#160;Though an impressive feat, there are plenty of graphical glitches, and flash still doesn't work right (even though this is the primary reason advertised for using ie4linux). &#160;Wine's be</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:06:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#4</link>
<description>It is possible to get flash working on 64 bit ubuntu - the trick is to install the 32 bit version of firefox (which will run just fine) and then it works.   The java issue is still there though.  I ended up just sticking w/32 bit ubuntu because of some of </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:54:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#3</link>
<description>I'm running Ubuntu on my server, and I love it, but I couldn't use it full time. &#160;Fonts look like ass, flash doesn't work (64-bit ubuntu), java doesn't seem to work in a web browser either. &#160;Adobe Lightroom for Linux? &#160;Ha. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;There is</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:16:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Windows is that reliable</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#2</link>
<description>Actually windows is that reliable. &#160;If it weren't for reboots related to OS updates, Windows would stay up for years at a time - 2000, XP or Vista - they've almost never outright crashed on me.&lt;p>&#10;Currently I am playing around with 64-bit Ubuntu serve</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:10:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Windows Vista - the O/S That Everyone Loves to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/26/21257/6939#1</link>
<description>The big deal-breaker for me on Vista is the copy-protection scheme.  I don't like the idea of an operating system that will cripple itself if it doesn't authenticate properly.  It's bad enough when regular software does that sort of thing, but to have the </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:12:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>