<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Science: From beakers and bacteria to quorums and quotas? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257</link>
<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dol.gov/oasam/regs/statutes/titleix.htm">Title IX&lt;/a> has long been recognized as a tool for equality in schools and sports between the two sexes. Should it be extended to into the hard sciences of &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.american.com/archive/2008/march-april-magazine-contents/why-can2019t-a-woman-be-more-like-a-man">higher education?&lt;/a></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:10:19 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:31:18 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>simokon: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#45</link>
<description>&lt;cite>I am not sure but I think it is a numerical and cultural difference. The population of India and China is in the billions. They may have the same percentage of "really bright people" but numerically there are more. Thus they get sent abroad and these</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:31:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#44</link>
<description>Longer is better. &#160;Pass it on.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:29:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: gotta love those white boys</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#43</link>
<description>From having attended two high schools, one in Texas and another in New York, as a teenager, I would say that standards in subjects vary radically throughout the nation. And within each of the schools, standards again varied depending on whether one was in </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:23:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: gotta love those white boys</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#42</link>
<description>SAT 2 takers are those that have taken "college-preparatory mathematics for more than three years, including two years of algebra, one year of geometry, and elementary functions (precalculus) and/or trigonometry." &#160;As I noted above, the SAT has been c</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:20:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#41</link>
<description>Ok, but that doesn't answer the question. &#160;Do you get more points for a longer essay or a shorter one?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:59:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#40</link>
<description>I'm basing my conclusion in research done on the SATs, which I though were sold by the same company...I was wrong. &#160;But grades on the SAT essay tests were accurately graded at from across the room by a skeptical researcher, who showed that they were g</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:51:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: gotta love those white boys</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#39</link>
<description>I had to search pretty hard to find &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://gallery.carnegiefoundation.org/collections/castl_he/djacobs/distribution_mathsat.pdf">an actual graph of the distributions of SAT scores&lt;/a>...unfortunately, it's not of the population at l</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:48:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: gotta love those white boys</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#38</link>
<description>SAT scores reflect the differences in intelligence (the old SAT use to have a strong correlation with IQ, the newer one not as much). Given that girls can't do as well as boys on the simple math required for the SAT, it shouldn't be surprising they avoid m</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:17:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#37</link>
<description>In what way? &#160;I mean, do they award more points for succinctness or for wordiness?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:17:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: anecdotal experience</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#36</link>
<description>Having recently completed my BA, I noticed the higher proportion of women at my college. &#160;During my last year, every class I took had a high number of collaborative projects, and without fail, the women I worked with contributed more and higher qualit</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:03:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Reality is biased</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#35</link>
<description>There is one very major problem with the study that is driving this movement, and that is that the study was done by almost all women. &#160;Economists have picked up on this as possibly skewing the study with bias. &#160;And it seems that as scientists, t</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:58:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#34</link>
<description>All the writing sample tests is how many words you can put down on paper in a given time. &#160;Scores are directly proportional to the length of the essay.&lt;p>&#10;Keep that in mind if you have to take the GRE.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:22:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#33</link>
<description>&lt;i>in the "real world" memorizing your way to the top or always agreeing with the professor is not going to get you a job &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;You don't have much experience in the "real world," do you?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:18:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: gotta love those white boys</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#32</link>
<description>And everybody knows the SATs are an unbiased, finely tuned and completely accurate measure of intelligence...whatever the heck that is.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:14:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#31</link>
<description>I am not sure. &#160;It's a good question.&lt;p>&#10;Although I would also note that Korean scientists strike me as being very ambitious. &#160;And furthermore, they are not limited as much in what they can research as the American scientists are in certain areas</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:48:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#30</link>
<description>Sure, but doesn't that stunt the scientific growth of those countries? If all the grad students, researchers and post-docs just do what some professor says without question or independent thinking? Where is the innovation coming from? &lt;p>&#10;Imagine what they</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:44:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Reality is biased</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#29</link>
<description>Actually, there is one recent discovery that might be attributable specifically to the scientist being a woman:&lt;p>&#10;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/01/science/01duck.html?pagewanted=1&amp;ei=5070&amp;en=b858fdbe9adc92bf&amp;ex=1179633</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 22:48:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#28</link>
<description>It doesn't even really do logic anymore - they got rid of that section and replaced it with a writing sample (which is, I suppose, also designed to test your logic skills, but if so I found it somewhat lacking in that department).</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 21:47:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#27</link>
<description>&lt;i>I once heard one of my former committee members say a lot of these Asian grad students have very good recall of facts and the ability to memorize tons of information but many have problems thinking for themselves. Of course, this is a major problem in g</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 21:45:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#26</link>
<description>The standard GRE only tests for three things:&lt;br>&#10;&#10;&lt;ol>&#10;&lt;li value="1">Vocabulary skills&lt;br>&#10;&lt;li value="2">Math skills&lt;br>&#10;&lt;li value="3">Logic&lt;p>&#10;&#10;&lt;/ol>&#10;None of these things are really related to what one will be doing in grad school which in my experience </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 21:39:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#25</link>
<description>I don't think IQ is everything (and I agree with you re: creativity). But it, and the difference in math ability between males and females, is certainly relevant to explaining why the science and engineering fields look like they do, and is reason enough t</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 18:51:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#24</link>
<description>&lt;i>Perception can mean a great deal in how people perceive these issues.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Sorry, tautology there.&lt;p>&#10;I guess I just mean that one should consider how much perception colors one's ideas about race and gender, whether for the positive or the negative.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:31:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#23</link>
<description>&lt;i>Asians do have higher average IQ's, this is well established.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;If IQs were everything in life, I doubt that I would have been born to a country split in half and that has now spent a great deal of its national resources on propping up a border and</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:27:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: What if it's white boys all the way down?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#22</link>
<description>&lt;i>I fine your anti-saurian bigotry disgusting.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I'm sorry for your disgust. &#160;But remember...reality is biased.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:14:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: What if it's white boys all the way down?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#21</link>
<description>I fine your anti-saurian bigotry disgusting. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:05:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Reality is biased</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#20</link>
<description>Who are these capable women being discriminated against? No one can say. All the discrimination is, as Rolison puts it, &#160;"&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.barnard.edu/bcrw/womenandwork/rolison.htm">unconscious biases and beliefs, which are tied to c</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:00:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Reality is biased</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#19</link>
<description>&lt;i>and there's no real question that women can and have succeeded in administrative roles.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Especially in the role of the sexy secretary. &#160;Those cute little darlins in the typing pool sure keep the place humming.&lt;br>&#10;.&lt;br>&#10;.&lt;br>&#10;.&lt;br>&#10;.&lt;br>&#10;.&lt;br</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 14:44:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Reality is biased</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#18</link>
<description>&lt;i>Replacing capable men with less qualified women decreases innovation.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Only if, of course, the woman is truly less capable. &lt;p>&#10;But, we all know that currently all kinds of business, science, and governmental positions are filled through the actio</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 14:40:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: What if it's white boys all the way down?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#17</link>
<description>&lt;i>Asians do have higher average IQ's, this is well established. On the SAT Asian girls score markedly higher at math than white girls, but only slightly lower than white boys.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Time traveling Lizard Men from the 5th Dimension do have higher IQs. &amp;nb</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 14:31:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#16</link>
<description>&lt;i>I once heard one of my former committee members say a lot of these Asian grad students have very good recall of facts and the ability to memorize tons of information but many have problems thinking for themselves. Of course, this is a major problem in g</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:45:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Reality is biased</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#15</link>
<description>It's not machoness, it's nerdiness (I don't mean that in a derogatory way). &lt;p>&#10;To presume it's discrimination means two things:&lt;p>&#10;&#10;&lt;ol>&#10;&lt;li value="1">Women can't overcome discrimination, even though women have demonstrated the ability to overcome discrim</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:28:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Reality is biased</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#14</link>
<description>&lt;i>Adding more people with more and different perspectives can only bring more innovation to these fields at a time when America needs them just such innovation most above all else in an increasingly competitive world economy.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I don't think that's n</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:25:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#13</link>
<description>Asians do have higher average IQ's, this is well established. On the SAT Asian girls score markedly higher at math than white girls, but only slightly lower than white boys. &lt;p>&#10;Also Barres is a lunatic. But I digress.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:23:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#12</link>
<description>&lt;i>One co-worker was talking the other day quite casually about how their parents would wake them up every morning at 4am to study. Rote memorization and insane competition in school. All day, every day.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;If that is the reason for a higher percentage</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:12:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Maybe it just needs some time?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#11</link>
<description>My field, Political Science, was dominated by men as recently as maybe a decade ago. &#160;This was clearly a cultural thing - even now, as we're seeing with HRC's presidential campaign, there's a cultural perception that politics is a "man's job". &#160;D</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 11:22:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Where I'm coming from on this...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#10</link>
<description>Disclaimer: I am a white male, so perhaps I don't "get it."&lt;p>&#10;I do not understand the big push to encourage members of certain groups to work in a certain field, especially science. If you have only a specific number of "slots" (be it grants, professorshi</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 08:46:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#9</link>
<description>&lt;i> How is it that other countries (and not just the Asian ones) can churn out competent female scientists and engineers by the millions, but most American women think math is too hard? &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I am not sure but I think it is a numerical and cultural diffe</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 08:30:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>jwb: Re: Reality is biased</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#8</link>
<description>You make a good point about the huge gap between women and men in higher education. &#160;Yet young men still face discrimination which keeps them out of the universities. &#160;High school boys are often advised to pursue careers in labor or trades, while</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2008 00:17:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: high hopes dashed</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#7</link>
<description>Two paid attention? &#160;That sounds like a pretty good return on your effort. &#160;The fact of the matter is that you have to be out toward the flat part of the bell curve to handle a career in science, so the pickings are always going to be slim.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Mar 2008 23:32:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#6</link>
<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/12/AR2006071201883_pf.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/12/AR2006071201883_pf.html&lt;/a>&lt;p>&#10;Link above is to a fascinating article after the</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Mar 2008 22:52:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>simokon: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#5</link>
<description>&lt;cite>I know one female American computer programmer.&lt;/cite>&lt;p>&#10;Unless we've already met, make that two. &#160;Nice to meet you.&lt;p>&#10;I'm an American-born, Caucasian female with an advanced degree in a (sometimes painfully) hard science: Computer/Electrical </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:15:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Reality is biased</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#4</link>
<description>Replacing capable men with less qualified women decreases innovation.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:45:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Reality is biased</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#3</link>
<description>I don't think that's the question. I think the question is would these fields be improved with more women in them. Even moreso, the question is, would society benefit from having more women in these fields.&lt;br>&#10;&lt;p>&#10;As you point out, men and women are cogni</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:29:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Science: From beakers and bacteria to</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#2</link>
<description>I know one female American computer programmer. &#160;They are a very rare breed, and most of them got their degrees awhile back. &#160;I also work with a lot of Indian H1B-type programmers. &#160;They are about evenly split male/female. &#160;I have also </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:27:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Reality is biased</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/3/6/10384/38257#1</link>
<description>Men and women are cognitively different. In general men are better than women at math and have greater visio-spatial ability. &#160;It should be no surprise that men outnumber women in engineering and the hard sciences - men are better than women at math a</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:20:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>