<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Animal Cruelty Or Art? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226</link>
<description>Artists like to press the artistic envelope to see if they can emerge with a new definition of art.  In doing so, artists will &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://arts.anu.edu.au/polsci/courses/POLS1005/2007/Images/Picasso.Guernica2.jpg ">provoke&lt;/a> and occasionally &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss_Christ">outrage us&lt;/a>.  But, if they're doing their job right, they are always asking us to question our preconceived notions of what art is.  A pitfall for artists out on the envelope's edg</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:48:03 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:06:21 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Words, not art</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#39</link>
<description>&lt;i>To my mind, any country not rich enough for the average family to afford a dependent sucks by definition.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Maybe if the U.S. hadn't sucked so much of Latin America's natural resources by going in with multinational corporations, Latin America woul</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:06:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Shvarts on Shvarts</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#38</link>
<description>Get a room, boys.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:20:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Shvarts on Shvarts</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#37</link>
<description>That's your solution for everything.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:38:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Shvarts on Shvarts</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#36</link>
<description>I'll be more crass than you, Urk. I think she just needs some dick.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:24:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Shvarts on Shvarts</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#35</link>
<description>It's gibberish, but I think she's accurately expressing what's in her head.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:55:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Shvarts on Shvarts</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#34</link>
<description>I'm sure that's very intimidating to people who don't like big words or long sentences.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:03:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Shvarts on Shvarts</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#33</link>
<description>I am in total agreement. &#160;I hate the recent practice of an "artist's statement." &#160;After all, if an artist isn't saying what she needs to say visually, she shouldn't be an artist.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:44:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Shvarts on Shvarts</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#32</link>
<description>That's why I never read the crap artists write about their art. What they're good at is art, otherwise their art would be writing.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:59:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Shvarts on Shvarts</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#31</link>
<description>She may not have learned anything about art, but she has devloped a thorough command of &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.yaledailynews.com/articles/view/24559">pomo cant&lt;/a>:&lt;blockquote>This piece -- in its textual and sculptural forms -- is meant to cal</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:20:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Yes she said yes yes</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#30</link>
<description>I know you have a hard time grasping anything that doesn't fit into your pre-concieved, over-simplified categories, but I happen to like art, and admire a variety of contemporary artists (you should try going to a museum or an art gallery some time, I thin</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:58:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Yes she said yes yes</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#29</link>
<description>Yes, I'm sure you arrived at the &lt;i>lumpen&lt;/i> consensus all by your little lonesome self.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:44:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Words, not art</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#28</link>
<description>&lt;i>A homeless man in the street can beg and scavenge for food.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;There have been some homeless people who have shed more light on the reality of life than quite a few artists. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;There's one guy around Times Square who sits with a sign propped </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:05:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: I was never told that</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#27</link>
<description>Actually, the great thing about the Whitney Biennial is that it's not just about establishment art but that the Whitney actively tries to find young artists who are not well known and who are not necessarily represented by agents when they are asked by the</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:25:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: Yes, yes</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#26</link>
<description>Why do you find it impossible to believe someone has his own taste and draws his own conclusions? Because you have no taste, and are incapable of drawing your own conclusions?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:36:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Yes, yes</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#25</link>
<description>We all know what a contrarian thinker you are.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:19:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: You weren't paying attention</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#24</link>
<description>My views of the current state of the art world are based on first hand observation. &lt;p>&#10;Those who reject all modern art out of hand typically aren't really interested in art at all, so they are easy to ignore. On the other hand I have been exposed to consi</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:23:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: You weren't paying attention</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#23</link>
<description>No, you were paying attention, you just heard it so many times you forgot that someone told you to think that.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:06:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: I was never told that</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#22</link>
<description>Well there is enourmous amounts of crap out there, and unfortunately the &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.whitney.org/biennial/">art establishment&lt;/a> actively promotes it.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:35:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: power of repetition</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#21</link>
<description>It's like people's opinions about schools: the one they know is great, all the rest are screwed up. &#160;We've been told for a hundred years that modern art is crap, and so everyone believes that modern art is crap, except for the stuff that they know abo</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:04:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: How about we get him to starve her?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#20</link>
<description>I agree much of the academy is screwed up, but there are a lot of good professional artists around (and as far as I can tell, no great ones), and not everyone in the academy is fraud, you just don't notice them because the Shvarts of the world get so much </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:14:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: How about we get him to starve her?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#19</link>
<description>Everything you buy is covered with stuff created by people who took academic art courses.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:57:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: How about we get him to starve her?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#18</link>
<description>You know, the "big reveal" may still be revealing. &#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.yaledailynews.com/articles/view/24530">Shvarts is firing back&lt;/a> and saying that the Yale statement was "ultimately inaccurate." &#160;And:&lt;blockquote>And while so</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:57:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: How about we get him to starve her?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#17</link>
<description>The art made by ordinary people in the course of their everyday lives continues to amaze me. &#160;The art made by professional artists, or people who have devoted their academic life to studying nothing but art, not so much.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:51:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: How about we get him to starve her?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#16</link>
<description>&lt;i>She's like an outrageous hypothetical dreamed up by an abortion opponent&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;That's what makes it art, and very effective political art at that. &#160;It's too bad Yale had to out her...or maybe it's not, since the big reveal is what makes it such an</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:45:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: Words, not art</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#15</link>
<description>A dog in the street can scratch around and find food. &#160;A homeless man in the street can beg and scavenge for food.&lt;p>&#10;A dog on a leash and a man in a cage cannot.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:42:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: How about we get him to starve her?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#14</link>
<description>What's sad about it? I'd go see it if it were real.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:17:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Re: How about we get him to starve her?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#13</link>
<description>It's a sad commentary on the current state of the 'arts' that it seemed entirely plausible, isn't it?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:39:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: True art</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#12</link>
<description>How about we tie Rush up on a street corner in the Castro with a pile of Oxy just out of reach.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:37:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Re: Answering your own question</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#11</link>
<description>Sorry...I must have missed the billboard that spells out your standard "Latin America Sucks" clarification.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:26:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Words, not art</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#10</link>
<description>&lt;i>Or maybe the question is: which countries are rich enough to afford pets?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;To my mind, any country not rich enough for the average family to afford a dependent sucks by definition. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:31:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Answering your own question</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#9</link>
<description>&lt;i>My&lt;/i> standard answer is, "Latin America sucks because of a combination of unfair and productivity-killing Old World land tenancy traditions, and similarly unfair and unworkable socialist policies." I don't know who you've been talking to.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:25:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Answering your own question</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#8</link>
<description>&lt;i>"why does Latin America suck?"&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Because the people there are generally less fair of hue than you? &#160;I mean, isn't that the standard answer?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:55:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Words, not art</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#7</link>
<description>&lt;i>Agency implies responsibility. Starving dogs in the streets of Honduras are likely ownerless, and are therefore part of the same class as all other ownerless animals. They can hunt and scavenge just like every other animal did prior to civilization.&lt;/i></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:53:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: Words, not art</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#6</link>
<description>&lt;i>Why is it that there are starving dogs that nobody stops to protest but when it's an art exhibit, there's a petition?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Agency implies responsibility. Starving dogs in the streets of Honduras are likely ownerless, and are therefore part of the same</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:38:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: How about we get him to starve her?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#5</link>
<description>Oh, wait. &#160;&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.yale.edu/opa/">She's not real.&lt;/a> &#160;Downmod me, please.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:50:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Words, not art</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#4</link>
<description>I would say it's impossible to have an informed opinion without seeing the pieces. &#160;When Giuliani was mayor of NYC, he condemned the Sensation exhibit when he heard that there was a painting of the Virgin Mary with pieces of elephant dung. &#160;Yet, </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:46:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>profwhat: Re: How about we get him to starve her?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#3</link>
<description>Holy crap, that story deserves a writeup of its own. &#160;She's like an outrageous hypothetical dreamed up by an abortion opponent, except she's real.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:46:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Hey, Yale Is Where George Bush Went To School!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#2</link>
<description>Must be something in the New Haven water supply. &#160;I hope nobody in Shvarts dorm used her turkey baster on the Thanksgiving Day bird.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:29:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: How about we get him to starve her?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/16/102045/226#1</link>
<description>In case anyone has the idea that all the really great art is only happening outside the US, I give you &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.yaledailynews.com/articles/view/24513">Aliza Shvarts&lt;/a>.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:20:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>