<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Ben Stein And Intelligent Design: Truth Sings The Devolution Blues (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629</link>
<description>In his new movie, &lt;i>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.expelledthemovie.com/">Expelled:&lt;/a> &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1091617/">No Intelligence Allowed&lt;/a>&lt;/i>, Ben Stein decides to take a page from the Michael Moore school of film-making in his attempt to debunk evolution and the science community that teaches it. Moore has often been accused of not telling the whole story, and it seems as if Stein has fallen into an even more extreme version of disingenuous documentary film-maki</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:40:52 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:29:55 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Only one falsehood that I'm aware of.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#25</link>
<description>My favorite story about the Aroostook War is that the two sides sent negotiators to talk to one another. Each of the two negotiating teams had maps that "unequivocally demonstrated" their side's legitimate claim. The thing was settled when the two teams si</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:29:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Only one falsehood that I'm aware of.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#24</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>The US never invaded Canada&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Oh, but we came &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aroostook_War">close to doing so&lt;/a>.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:46:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Oops.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#23</link>
<description>Thank you for catching my obvious mistake. &#160;But, that was way back in our youthful, boisterous period as a nation (you know how those footloose youths can be). &#160;We've moved past that and would never, ever think about invading another country now,</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:19:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Yep, we did</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#22</link>
<description>Invade &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_1812#Great_Lakes_and_Canadian_theatre">Canada&lt;/a> that is.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:52:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>delete me: Re: Ben Stein And Intelligent Design...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#21</link>
<description>&lt;i>Yes, aside from the whole Christian god&lt;/i> [...]&lt;p>&#10;Hold up. I thought "intelligent" design meant that the world wasn't created by some god that got pissy with fig trees.&lt;br>&#10;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:37:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Apparently</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#20</link>
<description>The filmmakers thought they could get away with "fair use" of John Lennon's song &lt;i>Imagine&lt;/i> in their film. Yoko Ono is &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7364333.stm">now suing&lt;/a> to have distribution of the film with &lt;i></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:58:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Only one falsehood that I'm aware of.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#19</link>
<description>Sure, we've invaded Canada &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0158983/">plenty of times&lt;/a>!</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:40:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Only one falsehood that I'm aware of.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#18</link>
<description>The US never &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109370/">invaded Canada&lt;/a>.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:36:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Ben Stein And Intelligent Design...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#17</link>
<description>&lt;i>Only a fraction of the deceits are outright falsehoods, and I'm sure that's so for Expelled too.&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;Yes, aside from the whole Christian god creating the universe in seven days thing and the little bit about intelligent design being scientific. I </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:20:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>arromdee: Re: Ben Stein And Intelligent Design...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#16</link>
<description>If you want one that's harder to make jokes about, Moore claimed that Enron would benefit from the pre-1998 proposed Unocal pipeline.&lt;p>&#10;The problem is that in propaganda like this most of the deceit is done by insinuation, juxtaposition of things to make </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:25:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>delete me: Re: Ben Stein And Intelligent Design...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#15</link>
<description>Mr. Moore claimed Mr. Bush was reading "My Pet Goat", when instead he was reading "&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pet_Goat">The Pet Goat&lt;/a>".</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:17:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Territan: Re: Ben Stein And Intelligent Design...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#14</link>
<description>Let's start with the falsehoods. Link, please.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:21:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>arromdee: Re: Ben Stein And Intelligent Design...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#13</link>
<description>Do falsehoods and misleading editing count?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:43:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: Ben Stein And Intelligent Design...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#12</link>
<description>Can you show one documented example of where Michael Moore lied about something?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:13:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: ok I'll bite</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#11</link>
<description>When didn't Michael Moore tell the truth? He spins things his way like any media maven but he also documents all his points. Despite his asserting controversial facts relating to relevant public issues and figures, he's never been so much as sued an court </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:06:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>arromdee: Re: Ben Stein And Intelligent Design...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#10</link>
<description>What I find amusing about this is that now non-rightwingers have to admit that Michael Moore isn't telling the truth, just because a right-wing nut came up with a movie that used similar tactics. &#160;There were some interviews on the Skepticality podcast</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:13:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>keta: Ho Hum</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#9</link>
<description>More bullshit from those that believe in a Big Kahuna, and how they're persecuted for their efforts.&lt;p>&#10;Fuck 'em all. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:02:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>logan: Re: Ben Stein And Intelligent Design: Truth Sings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#8</link>
<description>I thought you were doing a meta thing about infinite regressions of creators. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:48:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: RE: Strawman evolution</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#7</link>
<description>&lt;i>so many 'Darwinist' critics of intelligent design not only seem to think that human beings throughout the world have all evolved identically but attack scientists like James Watson who state obvious truths about human evolution.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;So, what do you t</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:23:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Steve Urkel: Evolution good! But only up to a certain point</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#6</link>
<description>ID is absurd, it and this film deserve ridicule, but I find it strange that so many 'Darwinist' critics of intelligent design not only seem to think that human beings throughout the world have all evolved identically but attack scientists like James Watson</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:20:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Truthiness croaks</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#5</link>
<description>The trailer they've been showing on TV makes it pretty obvious what kind of a piece of garbage the movie is: the Darwinists are played by disheveled old men with lunatic eyes.&lt;p>&#10;Apparently Ben Stein was as afraid of having an unvetted audience at the prem</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:56:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: My problem with ID</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#4</link>
<description>oops, sorry about the double post. &#160;It said the first post failed, apparently it didn't.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:04:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: My problem with ID</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#3</link>
<description>If complex things require a designer, the designer must itself be even more complex than the thing designed, and thus must in turn require a designer. &#160;We then have an infinite regression of ever more complex designers - a clearly ridiculous result I </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:03:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: My problem with ID</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#2</link>
<description>If complex things require a designer, the designer must itself be even more complex than the thing designed, and thus must in turn require a designer. &#160;We then have an infinite regression of ever more complex designers - a clearly ridiculous result I </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 08:03:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeeter1: Re: Ben Stein And Intelligent Design: Truth Sings</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/19/123418/629#1</link>
<description>At one time, I used to like Ben Stein, but no longer. &#160;I'm a life-long scientist (biology, medical technology, anthropology, chemistry), and although I'm also an arm-chair Christian, I firmly believe in evolution. &#160;The whole &lt;a rel="nofollow" hre</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:39:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>