<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>[Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in Shooting (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021</link>
<description>Four police detectives were found &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/26/nyregion/26BELL.html?bl&amp;ex=1209268800&amp;en=0f8a35dd4edbbafb&amp;ei=5087%0A">not guilty on all charges&lt;/a> by a New York City bench trial in the November 2006 shooting death of Sean Bell. The verdict immediately sparked outrage among some watching the trial, and protests began.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:28:34 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:48:37 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Do you really want to play the race card?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#58</link>
<description>What I don't get is why people can't move to a color blind society. If somebody is acting like a thug, then they are a thug, despite what color they are. If the cops brutalized some innocent person, why does it matter what color they are? Each case should </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:48:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Do you really want to play the race card?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#57</link>
<description>That's still racism. Do you think white people can't be racist against white people? It's fine to hold that "sick and tired of the shenanigans" concept in the abstract--I'm sure that's why plenty of black cops join up to some degree--but it's discriminator</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:25:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Do you really want to play the race card?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#56</link>
<description>Blue bond, eh? What color was the first cop to open fire? If he was white I guess the author's claim could hold water. But if he was black, no dice. I'm too lazy to look it up.&lt;p>&#10;Also, if we're willing to suppose a reason for hypothetical excessive black </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 06:19:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Do you really want to play the race card?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#55</link>
<description>Here's one black man's rather interesting take on how race &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/20080512_Under_the_Sun__Cops_must_keep_colleagues_from_losing_it.html">does influence&lt;/a> black-cop on black-suspect violence and</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:51:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Mary Jo Kopechne: Re: smart lawyers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#54</link>
<description>You disregard the amount of shots because you say crossfire gives the illusion of people shooting at the cops; but if you were to get a no-knock warrant in the middle of the night (i.e., the illusion of someone breaking into your house) and shot at the cop</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 May 2008 00:30:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#53</link>
<description>Um, if you read po157's &#160;write up one of the links mentions that the cop jumped in front of the car. ;) &#160;So, the obvious answer is, &lt;i> a dumb one.&lt;/i></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:54:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#52</link>
<description>Indeed, what cop would do that?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:21:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#51</link>
<description>&lt;i>Since the specific call we're discussing is "try to stop a potential drive-by shooting," &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;And if a few brown people get shot in the process, who cares? &#160;After all, they're brown. &#160;If our cop's can't shoot brown people at will, then civi</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:36:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#50</link>
<description>No, I figure they would be out hassling random citizens, looking to instigate another one of those incidents I was talking about where &lt;i>the suspect became belligerent and resisted arrest.&lt;/i> &#160;That's why people are wondering where the cops are when </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:15:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#49</link>
<description>&lt;i>then you're basically saying that cops should receive special treatment, because if they don't they might not protect us.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;That's exactly what I'm saying. Guys with legal "carry concealed" permits are responsible only for their own defense, same a</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:52:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: NYC Police</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#48</link>
<description>We kinda figured &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sfwchan.com/pics/92024873.jpg">as much&lt;/a>.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:20:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#47</link>
<description>&lt;i>By all indications, the cops did make errors of judgment and overreacted. But innocence isn't the standard the court needs to judge; guilt is. The extent of the overreaction was understandable for cops assessing a potential risk of violence, and acting </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:25:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: re: reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#46</link>
<description>&#160;So might makes right?</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:18:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#45</link>
<description>&lt;i>It's still a situation where the cops who I am still not convinced were readily identifiable as cops escalated a situation unnecessarily.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I agree with you, to some extent -- as do reports of the altercation. At the time when one of Bell's group f</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:17:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: re: reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#44</link>
<description>Vulnerable or invulnerable, cop or not cop, he's the guy with the gun.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:42:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: re: reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#43</link>
<description>because emotional vulnerability is &lt;i>always&lt;/i> what I look for in a law enforcement officer</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:17:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#42</link>
<description>It's still a situation where the cops &lt;i>who I am still not convinced were readily identifiable as cops&lt;/i> escalated a situation unnecessarily. &#160; That guy didn't have to die, and had the shooter been a civilian it would not have been considered justi</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:15:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: &quot;Darwin awards&quot; are named for a reason</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#41</link>
<description>&lt;i>Some random idiot makes an off the cuff remark that he might harm a plainclothes policeman's family (and it's debatable whether or not he knew he was a cop) &#160;and deadly force is justified?&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Legally? Maybe. Evolutionally? Absolutely. The thing</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:12:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: smart lawyers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#40</link>
<description>&#160;Well...did he &lt;i>know&lt;/i> the guy?&lt;p>&#10;What are the odds some random guy in a bar knows your address?&lt;p>&#10;That guy was stupid, but cops are supposed to have &lt;i>some&lt;/i> judgment. &#160;If a citizen says someone threatened to come to their house and har</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:33:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: Re: smart lawyers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#39</link>
<description>&lt;i>seeing as the guy has no clue where his family is&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;And the cop is supposed to know that... how?&lt;p>&#10;&lt;i>sounds like typical bar-room shit talking to me.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Quite likely, which should only serve to impress the importance of good manners. Also, to</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:54:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: smart lawyers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#38</link>
<description>seeing as the guy has no clue &lt;i>where&lt;/i> his family is, that sounds like &lt;i>typical bar-room shit talking&lt;/i> to me.&lt;p>&#10;This was some cops abusing their authority, imo. &#160;Come on, how many of us have witnessed &#160;guys in an altercation making idle</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:39:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou: Meanwhile in another dimension...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#37</link>
<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.funnieststuff.net/viewmovie.php?id=800">This&lt;/a> is how it should have gone down.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:39:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: marksmen</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#36</link>
<description>Man, that'd be funny!</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:18:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: marksmen</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#35</link>
<description>And I suppose if the cop had nailed a kid two blocks away instead of the driver, they'd have nailed the driver with felony murder.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:11:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: Re: smart lawyers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#34</link>
<description>You raise some good points regarding the multiple shots, and I'd like to focus my comment on that. First however lets get out of the way your hypothetical scenario which I believe is inaccurate. &lt;p>&#10;The reality is that the cop who initially fired was serio</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:24:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Stop... Threadjack time.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#33</link>
<description>Exactly. &#160;Although I am also inclined to think that the government, on both local and federal level should consider stepping in on a tax level as well.&lt;p>&#10;Since companies are given tax exemptions locally as well as different tax breaks on a federal le</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:49:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: [Breaking Shoes] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#32</link>
<description>I get what you're saying. &#160;But in an instance where they were in plainclothes, and it's in dispute whether or not the guys knew they were actually officers, being in front of the vehicle was stupid.&lt;p>&#10;Having witnessed uniformed officers step in front</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:22:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Stop... Threadjack time.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#31</link>
<description>&lt;i> (instead of: hey, those corporations are being cheap asses and refusing to pay a living standard) &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Or, consumers are too cheap ass to enforce the standards they espouse. Instead of researching companies and purchasing goods/services from those w</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:08:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: [Breaking Shoes] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#30</link>
<description>That story says the car was not moving when the police officer positioned himself in front of it. No one was, "jumping in front of a moving vehicle."</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:48:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: What's up with &quot;Rev&quot; Al?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#29</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>If the 60% is from reported crimes, then it has no baring on the shootings of black men in New York as the recent shootings of black men were not related to reported crimes&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>If you say so. In any case I was addressing your cla</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:45:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: What's up with &quot;Rev&quot; Al?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#28</link>
<description>&lt;i>The 60% figure is from reported crimes, not arrests. (55% of those arrested in NYC are black, so if anything the police aren't paying enough attention to black criminals.)&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Then you are arguing against your own logic from further up. &#160;If the </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:37:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#27</link>
<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2006/271106shooting.htm">witness account of the officer moving to the front of the vehicle&lt;/a>&lt;p>&#10;I've seen many an officer step in front of a vehicle and order someone to stop, especiall</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:36:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#26</link>
<description>another write up I read elsewhere, let me go see if I can find it.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:21:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: What's up with &quot;Rev&quot; Al?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#25</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Sure, you could say those 60% were committing crimes, but what of the non-black people out there committing crimes who aren't checked because of their race&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>The 60% figure is from reported crimes, not arrests. (55% of those ar</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:04:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: What's up with &quot;Rev&quot; Al?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#24</link>
<description>&lt;i>Blacks account for 60% of the criminals in NYC. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Now, I would think that race percentage in terms of crimes is a little hard to know in a city with &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.aclu.org/racialjustice/racialprofiling/34579prs20080110.html">r</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:03:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: What's up with &quot;Rev&quot; Al?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#23</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>There are plenty of criminals of all races and both genders in NY...&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Blacks account for 60% of the criminals in NYC. Would it make you happier if a few Hispanics got gunned down by the cops to balance things out?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:21:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: smart lawyers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#22</link>
<description>&lt;i>Disregard for the moment how many shots were fired...Now whether or not he should have gotten in the way of the vehicle, whether or not he should be firing at a vehicle with multiple people in it...he gets a pass for self-defense.&lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;What the hel</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:16:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#21</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Nobody should be jumping in front of a moving vehicle&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>What gave you the idea that any of the cops jumped in front of a moving vehicle?</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:14:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: marksmen</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#20</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>Personally the only thing  I'm shocked by is that you can fire 50 bullets into a vehicle and not kill everyone in it&lt;/i>&lt;/blockquote>Never underestimate the incompetence of NYPD officers. The majority of the bullets missed the car (a Nissan </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:10:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: smart lawyers</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#19</link>
<description>Props to the Policemen's lawyer(s) for going with a bench trial vs. jury trial. I suspect your average citizen might have had a harder time voting to acquit police officers.&lt;p>&#10;from the TnT writeup, I find myself willing to agree. Disregard for the moment </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 03:55:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: not just comedy gold</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#18</link>
<description>When a bunch of guys in civvies wave guns at you in a sketchy neighborhood, you are probably justified in trying to GTFO.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:16:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#17</link>
<description>This is what burns me. &#160;Cops escalate the situation and someone else pays the price.&lt;br>&#10;Nobody should be jumping in front of a moving vehicle. &#160;If someone is leaving a drinking establishment and they may have slowed reactions, you're a moron if </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:26:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Do you really want to play the race card?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#16</link>
<description>&lt;i>Koreans don't like black folks. It's not the "media representation of black dominated neighborhoods," it's 'cause you're Korean.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;It's an interesting question, and something I had to think across 3 levels: (1) on the Korean level (2) on the Korean</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:58:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#15</link>
<description>I have to agree with you on this one. Cops, as a practice ought to avoid standing in front of cars. If they put themselves in danger, they shouldn't be allowed as policy to use their guns to extract themselves from that danger. The chances of the car escap</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:07:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#14</link>
<description>Awww, the officer is in danger?  So what.  That's part of the job.  That's what you signed up for.  If you're a cop and haven't made peace with the idea that it's a dangerous career, you need to get another job.  Is it safer for the cop to shoot?  Sure it </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:51:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>zyxwvutsr: Re: Do you really want to play the race card?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#13</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>&lt;i>As someone who is not white, I hesitate to move into neighborhoods that is predominantly black. &#160;And I think this is because of the media representation of black dominated neighborhoods as always being criminal and dangerous...(I am Kor</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:22:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#12</link>
<description>If "evading" endangers the lives of officers on the scene then they are justified in shooting into the car. &#160;I don't care if the officer jumped in front of the car in the first place, the idiot in the car has a choice - they can stop, or get shot. &amp;nb</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:49:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>gerrymander: not just comedy gold</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#11</link>
<description>Let's review &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8">Chris Rock's words of advice&lt;/a> on matters like this:&lt;p>&#10;Obey the law.&lt;br>&#10;Use common sense.&lt;br>&#10;Stop immediately.&lt;br>&#10;Be polite.&lt;br>&#10;Turn that shit off.&lt;br>&#10;Shut the fuck up</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:40:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: Do you really want to play the race card?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#10</link>
<description>I do actually. &#160;I knew the race of the cops involved as I read about the decisions this morning. &#160;However, I would still argue the race card as someone who is not white. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;As someone who is not white, I hesitate to move into neighborhoods</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:32:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Do you really want to play the race card?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#9</link>
<description>Here's &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://gothamist.com/attachments/jen/2008_01_bellcops.jpg">the cops involved in the Bell&lt;/a> situation.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:28:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: What's up with &quot;Rev&quot; Al?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#8</link>
<description>Originally, I used to think that about Al Sharpton as well, but over the years, as the number of truly horrific incidents of NYPD shooting down innocent black men have continued, I've changed my mind.&lt;p>&#10;Really, it seems that every 4 years or so, the NYPD </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:16:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: You know the truly shocking thing about Sharpton?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#7</link>
<description>It really isn't that he would turn into a "hyberbolic attention ho" by trading on somebody else's grief and misery to score some cheap points and get himself on the News At Six? &#160;It's really that there are still any people left in America who are surp</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:32:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: What's up with &quot;Rev&quot; Al?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#6</link>
<description>OK, but you don't get on the radio and start using highly emotional and loaded phrases like "abortion of justice" minutes after an event like this. You calmly suggest alternative ways to make the point of the aggrieved parties without sounding like a hyper</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:24:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: What's up with &quot;Rev&quot; Al?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#5</link>
<description>Well, he's not wrong in this case and he did call for calm. The reaction outside the courthouse was extremely emotional.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:20:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: What's up with &quot;Rev&quot; Al?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#4</link>
<description>How can Al Sharpton call for calm with a straight face after these types of events when he is usually fanning the flames before and after events like these happen? To &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24305660/">wit&lt;/a>:&lt;blockquote>"This </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:18:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Does Anyone Think This Is Going To Turn Out Well?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#3</link>
<description>The feds say they're &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2008/04/feds_pledge_pro.php">going to launch a probe&lt;/a> of the shooting giving all who remember how the Rodney King trial in LA a feeling of deja vu. &#160;Ma</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:15:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#2</link>
<description>&lt;i>I guess I can see where the cop that got hit by the car has a reason to open fire. &lt;/i>&#13;&#10;&lt;p>&#13;&#10;Even here, I think the police need far stricter and more uniform rules.  I watch far too many "World's Wildest Police Videos" type TV shows (everyone needs a b</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:51:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: [Breaking News] NYPD Detectives Acquitted in S</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/25/111248/021#1</link>
<description>I guess I can see where the cop that got hit by the car has a reason to open fire. I can kind of get behind that, although the wisdom of shooting into a vehicle with more than one person in it is kind of flawed.&lt;p>&#10;As for the others who showed up at the sc</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:19:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>