<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Senomyx: Salty Sweet Stock Report (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597</link>
<description>A hot new company for investment is Senomyx. They've scored major contracts with food suppliers such as &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.confectionerynews.com/news/ng.asp?n=84711-senomyx-nestle-flavors">Nestle&lt;/a>, Kraft, and &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/newstex/AFX-0013-24604188.htm">Coca Cola&lt;/a>. Their earnings are &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/news/ng.asp?n=84920-senomyx-nestle-ingredients-patents">looking good&lt;/a> and they're pouring </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 06:52:17 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 2 May 2008 12:03:58 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#19</link>
<description>Really? Wow. You're blowing my mind here, man.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 May 2008 12:03:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#18</link>
<description>Again, it's a parody - I don't see how anyone who actually took the time to read the article would view it as a pump and dump. &#160;Then again, considering the state of the US stock market, asking for reading comprehension from stock traders might be a li</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 May 2008 06:29:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#17</link>
<description>Even though this isn't about a stock tip, certainly Senomyx is being financed by food companies with mostly business interests at heart. &#160;I doubt that Coca Cola, Campbell, Kraft and Nestle care about food as much as they do about business. It's not me</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 May 2008 00:03:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: WWJCD -- What Would Jim Cramer Do?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#16</link>
<description>Jim Cramer would yell and wave his arms and say something completely random while telling you how awesome he is. &#160;"Bear Stearns is solid!"</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 21:10:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#15</link>
<description>&lt;i>I have no need for any chemicals in my body.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Are you a metaphysical spirit? &#160;Your body, like all matter, is composed entirely of chemicals.&lt;p>&#10;Still, I'm as suspicious of these industrial concoctions as you are. &#160;After the melamine/glut</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 21:07:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>JimmyHavok: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#14</link>
<description>I agree 100% with wetkarma. &#160;The intro looks exactly like a pump-and-dump come-on.&lt;p>&#10;Discussions of chemistry are OK with me. &#160;Anything that even looks like a stock tip is not.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 21:03:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MC Nally: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#13</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>If the ingredients are safe, as they claim, then why do they hide them under euphemisms?&lt;/blockquote>Have you ever seen the gag where an interviewer goes up and starts asking people if they're aware of the dangers of "dihydrogen monoxide"?&lt;p>&#10;I</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 21:00:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MC Nally: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#12</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>I have no need for any chemicals in my body.&lt;/blockquote>Your body &lt;b>is&lt;/b> chemicals.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 20:56:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#11</link>
<description>In San Francisco, at least, the produce is crazy good and reasonably priced for the quality of the food. &lt;p>&#10;And the local food movement has produced all sorts of artisanal food categories including fine chocolate, local cheese, amazing bakeries (as long a</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 18:30:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#10</link>
<description>Where on the west coast? Certainly not LA, lol.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 18:07:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#9</link>
<description>&lt;i>right.&lt;/i></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 17:14:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#8</link>
<description>&lt;i> "The ability to reduce sugar, salt, or artificial flavoring without sacrificing taste is a huge opportunity in this health-conscious society," says Robin Manners West of New Mexico's State Investment Council, which has purchased shares.&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I would </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 14:57:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#7</link>
<description>Well, they're not safe. I have no need for any chemicals in my body. But they're not "hiding" anything, they're just "helping their clients clean up their labels." ;-)</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 14:23:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ivyafire: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#6</link>
<description>This is the part that bugs me the most. &#160;If the ingredients are safe, as they claim, then why do they hide them under euphemisms?&lt;p>&#10;I don't like sneaky behavior, and the more they try to hide things, the more suspicious I become. &#160; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 14:15:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>postillion: Re: WWJCD -- What Would Jim Cramer Do?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#5</link>
<description>I would think that food company stocks are generally somewhat fickle. &#160;It's like the time when every single major food company decided to spend tons of money launching products for the South Beach diet. &#160;&lt;p>&#10;Unfortunately, they were so behind the</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 14:06:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#4</link>
<description>Yeah, I initially wanted to make it sort of like a parody where I talked up how fabulously the company was performing but then cut that with hippie talk about what an awful no good terrible product they were peddling. Separately, then I also decided I didn</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 13:24:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#3</link>
<description>Eh, maybe too paranoid? &#160;The article doesn't take a side, really - it starts out upbeat but ends by pointing out a number of possible downsides of this product. &#160;If the AP runs an article on Vioxx, does it include a disclaimer about not buying Me</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 11:47:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: WWJCD -- What Would Jim Cramer Do?</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#2</link>
<description>Here's a look at the &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=SNMX">company profile&lt;/a>.  Does this look like a buy, sell, hold, or stay the fuck away from this puppy?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 10:14:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: be very careful</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/4/29/17486/7597#1</link>
<description>So call me paranoid, but TnT editors should be careful in running stories which can be seen as recommendations to buy a particular stock. At minimum you want to put a safe harbor statement at the bottom of the story that the story is NOT a recommendation o</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 10:12:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>