<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>SEX! Now that I got your attention, let's talk about SEX! (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/22/122241/955</link>
<description>The American Psychiatric Association has &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.psych.org/MainMenu/Newsroom/NewsReleases/2008NewsReleases/dsmwg.aspx">announced&lt;/a> (pdf) the list of practitioners that will draft the next &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.psych.org/dsmv.asp">Diagnostic and Statistical Manual&lt;/a>. Given that so many conditions listed in the current DSM are &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/disorders/dsm4TRclassification.htm#Sexual">sexual in nature&lt;/a>, and subject to del</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 09:54:41 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:36:55 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: SEX!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/22/122241/955#4</link>
<description>Yes, a Republican (and there are several) whose career is ruined by a gay sex scandal might claim that homosexuality ruined his life, but more accurately, it is Republicanism which ruined his life, since gay people who do not drive themselves crazy about i</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:36:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>harzerkatze: Re: SEX!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/22/122241/955#3</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote>As for the topic, I don't understand why they can't just go by the general rule of "if it is between consenting adults and nobody is hurt (mentally or physically) in the near or long term then it is probably okay" rule. It seems like it would m</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 02:32:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: SEX!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/22/122241/955#2</link>
<description>I also find his columns fun, although like you I don't really feel the need for advice. It's just amusing when he gets picked up by MSNBC and reading some of the mail he gets. Crazy job.&lt;p>&#10;As for the topic, I don't understand why they can't just go by the</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 14:08:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: SEX!</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/22/122241/955#1</link>
<description>I read the sexual advice column "Savage Love" by Dan Savage - it is a somewhat voyeuristic practice of mine, given that I don't actually feel the need for any sexual advice. &#160;Other people's sexual concerns can be amusing. &#160;Anyway, Mr. Savage appr</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 10:46:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>