http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/22/155225/269 A great and prestigious museum is probably not a place you'd figure would get caught up in a controversy involving naked bodies. And, most certainly, you wouldn't figure that millennia-old mummies would be the naked bodies causing the controversy. At the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.museum.manchester.ac.uk/">Manchester Museum</a> they're taking propriety seriously. As it happens, one's sensitivity to propriety is another's outrageous act of Monty Pythonesque lunacy. So it goes at Manchester as the en-us Mon, 26 May 2008 10:48:04 EST Mon, 26 May 2008 11:05:03 EST http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/22/155225/269#2 You have to go see the photos of the covered up money.  It's in the last link of the sub.<p> The mummies look like they are in a white body bag.<p> If I went to see the mummies, I would demand my entrance fee back.  I feel for the kids.  Wha Mon, 26 May 2008 11:05:03 EST http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/22/155225/269#1 Viewing exposed mummy bodies can be compared to watching adult content (i.e., sex, violence, bad language) on TV or at the movies; those who don't want to see it or hear it, don't have to.  Change the channel.  But what about the wishes of the mu Mon, 26 May 2008 11:01:32 EST string http://www.treesandthings.com/search/