<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Is That &quot;Let's Refuel America&quot; or &quot;Let's Refool America&quot;? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/7/1088/94928</link>
<description>&lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.chryslerllc.com/en/">Chrysler LLC&lt;/a> has a problem. &#160;They have a whole bunch of fuel-inefficient pickup trucks, vans, and SUVs in their inventory and gas prices show no signs of retreating from the neighborhood of (US)$4.00 a gallon. &#160;What the company needs is a way to make operating a gas guzzler attractive to the motoring public. &#160;In a sort of "turning lemons into lemonade" way, Chrysler says it's &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/auto</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 06:25:35 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:01:19 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Shy Elf: Re: Price...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/7/1088/94928#9</link>
<description>Yeah, must be all the MTBE they put in the gas in all the rest of the country in 2003, right, right.&lt;p>&#10;In addition to high taxes and low volatility limits which you also have in some other areas of the country, you also have high market concentration and </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:01:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Refooling America - one sucker at a time</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/7/1088/94928#8</link>
<description>Hey--don't knock the prius. There's never been a car more fun to cut off.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 19:05:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>WMK: Refooling America - one sucker at a time</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/7/1088/94928#7</link>
<description>My Opinion in 2 parts: &lt;br>&#10;&lt;ol>&lt;li>Anyone who buys a gas guzzling piece of shit from an American car company deserves whatever easily foreseen misfortune follows from that decision. &#160;&lt;br>&#10;&lt;li>Any American car company that hasn't spent the last 5-10 (</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 15:57:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: Price...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/7/1088/94928#6</link>
<description>&lt;i>The State of California operates &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/analysis_publications/primer_on_gasoline_prices/html/petbro.html">its own reformulated gasoline program&lt;/a> with more stringent requirements than Feder</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 14:14:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PenitenziAgite: Price...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/7/1088/94928#5</link>
<description>&lt;i>California and Hawaii, the rest of us feel your pain&lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;I can't speak about Hawaii, but can someone explain to me why gas is so damn expensive in California? &#160;I live less than 20 miles from a gigantic oil refinery, and yet my gasoline is among </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 13:46:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: reason #2</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/7/1088/94928#4</link>
<description>If they've studied the wetkarma school of economics, they expect the cost of gas to be under $2.99 within six months...making this an absolutely brilliant strategy today.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 12:40:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>thefadd: Re: marketing question</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/7/1088/94928#3</link>
<description>My gf (who is a little pissed about this because she just bought a jeep last month) had a very good point--the chances that there will be a chrysler in 2-3 years to continue holding up this guarantee aren't fantastic. Money you don't have to pay out until </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 03:11:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>wetkarma: marketing question</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/7/1088/94928#2</link>
<description>Why not just the price of the car? I'm not sure that Chrysler is trying 'to pull a fast one' -- its not as if they can roll out new higher mpg vehicles on a dime (usually takes 3 years), but I question this marketing approach. It seems entirely too laden w</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 02:56:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>pO157: Re: Is That &quot;Let's Refuel America&quot; or</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/5/7/1088/94928#1</link>
<description>&lt;i> With gas prices heading towards the $4.00 a gallon threshold in most of the nation (California and Hawaii, the rest of us feel your pain) this offer of three years of $2.99 a gallon gas sounds too good to be true. &#160;There might be a reason for that</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 09:37:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>