<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Grand Jury By Petitition - A Final Chance For People's Justice Or An Abortion Of Justice? (Trees And Things)</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246</link>
<description>People in Kansas have been trying for some time to stop Dr. George Tiller from doing what he does best.  They've tried to legislate him out of business, without luck.  They've tried to find sympathetic prosecutors to charge him with a crime - likewise without luck.  They've even shot him twice, but only winged him in the arm.  </description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:14:44 EST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:42:17 EST</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>skeptic: let me try again</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#14</link>
<description>I think you have made a very believable analysis of the political balance regarding the abortion issue. &#160;There are two opposed factions, both of which have a large and devoted base of support among voters. &#160;No matter how desperately the right-to-</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:42:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Can't (democratically) outlaw stupidity...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#13</link>
<description>The Congress being a rough representation of the opinions of the people, and the people being split roughly 55/45 (depending on the pole and pole questions) on this issue, I doubt you are going to get such a bill past the inevitable filibuster, as others h</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:23:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Can't (democratically) outlaw stupidity...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#12</link>
<description>Abortion, like same-sex marriage, is one of those strange issues in which party affiliation is no guarantee of how a politician may vote.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:02:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Can't (democratically) outlaw stupidity...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#11</link>
<description>No, I don't think that every state would outlaw abortion in the event of the overturn of Roe vs. Wade, although the federal government might do so, in which case abortion would become illegal in all states. &#160;However, there are also various other possi</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:00:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>joshv: Re: Can't (democratically) outlaw stupidity...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#10</link>
<description>"...we will see the reversal of Roe vs. Wade and the end of legal abortion in the US..."&lt;p>&#10;I see these two outcomes constantly conflated by those of the liberal persuasion. &#160;Do do you actually think that &lt;i>every&lt;/i> state will legislate abortion out</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:43:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Can't (democratically) outlaw stupidity...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#9</link>
<description>&lt;i>which is not unlikely in the situation that I describe. &lt;/i>&lt;p>&#10;Unless you're saying that the Republicans will gain the sort of majority in Congress that they haven't seen since Reconstruction, I'd say that I'll have to disagree with you on that one. &amp;n</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:21:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Can't (democratically) outlaw stupidity...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#8</link>
<description>In the scenario that I depict, there is a Republican President who appoints a conservative Supreme Court Justice, resulting in the overturn of Roe vs. Wade. &#160;That does not in itself make abortion illegal, however, it does create the opportunity for Co</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:26:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: True that.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#7</link>
<description>I don't think that either part would or should be like North Korea. &#160;The analogy I chose probably wasn't the best, since it needs some explanation. &#160;My comparison wasn't supposed to be comparing two parts of the US, but rather between two differe</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:47:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: True that.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#6</link>
<description>I guess my question is why must part of the US be the US and another part be North Korea?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:19:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Sucks To Live In A Flyover State.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#5</link>
<description>Well, I did say it would still be a disaster - but there are degrees of disaster. &#160;I wouldn't want to live in Cuba, for example, but I'd much rather live in Cuba than North Korea.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:15:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MayorBob: Sucks To Live In A Flyover State.</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#4</link>
<description>Your post points out the importance of retaining Roe v. Wade as the law of the land.  To allow the ball to go back in the states' court might see access to family planning, contraception, and abortion services (because it's really more than just about bein</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:59:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Re: Can't (democratically) outlaw stupidity...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#3</link>
<description>&lt;i>From the viewpoint of the anti-abortion activists, this does qualify as an anti-corruption issue, since, as they would put it, it is the responsibility of doctors to preserve life rather than to end it, and thus the killing of the unborn is a corruption</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:49:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>skeptic: Re: Can't (democratically) outlaw stupidity...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#2</link>
<description>From the viewpoint of the anti-abortion activists, this does qualify as an anti-corruption issue, since, as they would put it, it is the responsibility of doctors to preserve life rather than to end it, and thus the killing of the unborn is a corruption of</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:30:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>port1080: Can't (democratically) outlaw stupidity...</title>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/story/2008/6/17/103525/246#1</link>
<description>When you get right down to it, one of the big failings of any democratic system is that if a majority (or a politically influential large minority) has a wrongheaded policy, they get a chance to enact it (or in this case, take advantage of a democratic pro</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:06:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<textInput>
<title>Search Trees And Things</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.treesandthings.com/search/</link>
</textInput>

</channel>
</rss>